Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Mid to Long Term Discussion 2017


buckeyefan1

Recommended Posts

Obviously we're going to see a wide assortment of different scenarios in the next several days.  The cold is likely coming with the arctic front pushing far south.  The question is the status of the energy rounding down the W coast.  There are two distinct pieces by 18z Jan 5 along the W coast.  Yesterday's 12z GFS killed out the first piece with little to no overrunning moisture during the Jan 6-7 time frame and consolidated the 2nd which set up a big snowstorm around jan 9 since it gave time for the HP to move into prime placement in the NE. 

The Euro, meanwhile, has a much more robust first wave and produced a significant storm, giving it room to consolidate and pull a low all the up the east coast.   The GFS since has moved more in this direction a bit with a sheared first s/w and a significant overrunning event.  The location of the arctic front as it moves south will determine the snow axis location should this first s/w hold on as it gets chewed up by the PV overhead.

Should the first wave be sheared out quickly enough per the GFS, it'll allow the second wave to develop and by then the cold will be well established.  The 6z GFS this morning has the Jan 9 storm that yesterday's 12z had, just a bit weaker and farther south.

So there are 2 waves to watch.  First wave, if Euro has its way, would hold its own but will have cold air issues as it still hasn't established over the area yet with the HP still back over the plains - or, if the GFS is correct, could be a sheared out wave with overrunning event with a stripe of big snow totals.  Second wave, either a non-starter per the Euro since it develops the first wave, or could be a big player per the GFS if it kicks out the first wave quickly enough.

6z GFS valid 18z jan 5

r5qpuFY.png

6z GFS valid 18z jan 6 - sheared out first wave with overrunning snow stripe

3m0pkHy.png

0z Euro valid 0z jan 7 - develops the first wave

3JUdc22.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, NCSNOW said:

Yeah I'm with you as well as several others on here I'm sure. It's just one of the options and thankfully it was on its own without any ens support.

Biggest news is this threat has legs. So instead of worrying about how it crosses the finish line in 8 to 10 days, I'm more interested in getting it to the starting line in 4 days. Then we can start the whaling and nashing of teeth on just how the race will be run. It is nice to have something to track besides a pattern change I can tell you that.

Yep, so much more interesting when we have an verified threat.  

 

18 minutes ago, griteater said:

Maybe it's personal bias and long way to go, but I can't shake the idea that this is going to be a climber and a moderate hit for central VA into the mid-atlantic (Bob Chill country).  The ENE overrunning setup looks good overall, but I don't trust that the temps are going to hold for a big hit in our forum.  The transient Greenland ridge and configuration over the NE needs to overperform.  

That's my biggest fear as well.  I don't think we're whiffed at this point, I think we have a storm but the cold doesn't seem to add up.  I has the feeling of a I-40 north kind of thing.  There's no high to the northeast, it's out west, not really a CAD setup etc.  I'm just skeptical of the cold at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideal scenario?  The first wave shears out but still brings along a ton of overrunning precip to minimize WAA since the core of the cold is still too far west.  Then, the second wave develops as the high situates itself over the NE ala 12z GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, avalanche said:

If you are in the area of West Jefferson/Boone NC to southern Virginia, you need to be on the lookout for some possible sleet/fzrn from the northern extent of the precip field. It could cause some issues if everything pans out.

What exactly are you talking about? You aren't from around here are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CAD_Wedge_NC said:

What exactly are you talking about? You aren't from around here are you?

LOL, talking about weather. My apologies if I don't speak "foothill language". I've lived part of my life in Kansas, Tennessee, etc, and everywhere people articulate things differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideal scenario?  The first wave shears out but still brings along a ton of overrunning precip to minimize WAA since the core of the cold is still too far west.  Then, the second wave develops as the high situates itself over the NE ala 12z GFS.


Thanks for the thoughts wow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mackerel_sky said:

Lol! Yeah, if anybody's gonna get snow, it's the cities he mentioned! Only time we get ice and the mountains get rain, usually during a strong CAD, which is not showing up currently!

Agreed. Merely reiterating what has been brought to the table for this area. Would love to see an all snow event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, avalanche said:

Agreed. Merely reiterating what has been brought to the table for this area. Would love to see an all snow event.

WAY too soon to be talking precip types. We have to get the pattern going, then we gotta make sure we have a storm at all. no need to even think about precip types til 5 days out, then start really focusing on it when it's about 72 hours out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, avalanche said:

Agreed. Merely reiterating what has been brought to the table for this area. Would love to see an all snow event.

My guess at this point would be mostly snow in the far NW/mountain areas, with mixing issues across the northern areas and a cold rain south of there.  On the other hand, if we see subsequent model cycles that strengthen the blocking, then I would be inclined to expand the snow/wintry area farther east and south.  Unfortunately, after years of watching models over-press cold air in the LR, I'm not too optimistic that stronger blocking will turn out to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, avalanche said:

LOL, talking about weather. My apologies if I don't speak "foothill language". I've lived part of my life in Kansas, Tennessee, etc, and everywhere people articulate things differently.

It has nothing to do with language.... We are talking about the western NC micro-climate and how the sn/ip/zr distribution normally pans out. Freezing rain and sleet does not occur in the mountains under those conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2016 at 4:19 PM, FallsLake said:

Just have the 850 map. Not a real CAD look but it looks like the cold would not be pushed out. 

 

ecmwf_T850_us_11.jpg

This isn't going to be popular but we have this whole cold not verifying as cold as progged issue all winter.  Don't see why this would buck that trend.  I see the cutoff line of any potential precip type to move north.  It's awesome we have a threat to track but let's be real about the cold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LithiaWx said:

This isn't going to be popular but we have this whole cold not verifying as cold as progged issue all winter.  Don't see why this would buck that trend.  I see the cutoff line of any potential precip type to move north.  It's awesome we have a threat to track but let's be real about the cold. 

Looks fine to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mackerel_sky said:

Looks fine to me

High pressure is way too far to the west on that map.  If you have a system coming through, it's not going to have much trouble warming the mid and low levels if there is no cold air feed.  I'm just going off of the map that Marietta posted.  Later frames may move the high into a better position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cold Rain said:

High pressure is way too far to the west on that map.  If you have a system coming through, it's not going to have much trouble warming the mid and low levels if there is no cold air feed.  I'm just going off of the map that Marietta posted.  Later frames may move the high into a better position.

I still think there are going to be some winners from the eventual event.  I'm too far south here.  Cut nc in half the northern half is in much better shape save the mountains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cold Rain said:

High pressure is way too far to the west on that map.  If you have a system coming through, it's not going to have much trouble warming the mid and low levels if there is no cold air feed.  I'm just going off of the map that Marietta posted.  Later frames may move the high into a better position.

High gets buried in Sun Valley, Idaho this run.  Rain from lunch next Thurs to Sat morning, snow in VA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DopplerWx said:

most of nc still rain at 195.

Slight improvement over the 6z, but not gonna be the big one, still a fairly long strung out event...if we can get a little colder it would be massive for many folks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, griteater said:

Maybe it's personal bias and long way to go, but I can't shake the idea that this is going to be a climber and a moderate hit for central VA into the mid-atlantic (Bob Chill country).  The ENE overrunning setup looks good overall, but I don't trust that the temps are going to hold for a big hit in our forum.  The transient Greenland ridge and configuration over the NE needs to overperform.  

Like the GFS shows...actually surprised how close we are to wintery precip with this crappy a block and SER.

Screen Shot 2016-12-29 at 11.36.34 AM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, packbacker said:

Like the GFS shows...actually surprised how close we are to wintery precip with this crappy a block and SER.

Screen Shot 2016-12-29 at 11.36.34 AM.png

Every single feature on that map is several hundred miles too far to the west, except the north Atlantic thumb ridge.  Look at the direction of the trough.  Terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...