Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,512
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    12bet1 net
    Newest Member
    12bet1 net
    Joined

February 28th-March 2nd possibly significant overrunning event/winter storm


Thundersnow12

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What a cloosterfook this turned into north of the OV.

 

Everything is a cloosterfook on models these days.

 

The NAMs and SREF finally woke up and joined the other models in reducing totals for LAF. I'll stick with my 3-5" call, but more confident about the 3" than the 5". :lol:  :arrowhead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything is a cloosterfook on models these days.

 

The NAMs and SREF finally woke up and joined the other models in reducing totals for LAF. I'll stick with my 3-5" call, but more confident about the 3" than the 5". :lol:  :arrowhead:

 

Should still be a nice snow to frolic in, push around with the shovel, etc. That stuff is huge now that we're staring down the barrel of March.

 

I'll count the number of flakes up here for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should still be a nice snow to frolic in, push around with the shovel, etc. That stuff is huge now that we're staring down the barrel of March.

 

I'll count the number of flakes up here for you.

 

Yep, a nice snow to be sure. I'll gladly take it. :)

 

12z GFS actually bumped QPF up a bit for here and IND, MIE, OKK, etc...so that's good. Again, fits perfectly into the 3-5" range for here...higher totals south and east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around an inch here and maybe up to 2" Detroit south. #burp

 

 

Yep, SREF plume mean's down to about 2" now for DTW from 4-6" yesterday. RGEM says DAB.

:axe:

I'm going to be upset if after all of this extreme cold, we get whiffed to the south with this storm and then get rained on from the 3rd-4th system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking good down there.  I'm thinking 5-6" for LAF.  Nothing crazy but a respectable storm.  

 

 

Yeah I'm kinda regretting nudging things down earlier (and if anything, things seem to be overperforming upstream) but it's basically semantics...not much of a difference between 4-6" and 5-7".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm kinda regretting nudging things down earlier (and if anything, things seem to be overperforming upstream) but it's basically semantics...not much of a difference between 4-6" and 5-7".

Yea when I make my maps my goal is within 1" either way. If I say 4-6 and we get 3 or 7 then I can live with it. It's bad when you go 2-3 and get 6-8 though lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...