Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Hurricane Arthur


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 847
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Generally speaking, you can use a logarithmic equation to determine wind speed between 0-10m. Vertical wind shear at that height varies drastically depending on land cover at that height.

A forest will have a shear coefficient (alpha) of 0.6

Farmland will have a shear coefficient of (alpha) of 0.3

Water has an alpha of 0.15.

The equation to determine wind speed from one height to another is

XmWS=10mWS* (x/10)^alpha

X is the height you want to determine.

Thanks!  I also found a very nice description of this on wikipedia. For Arthur, so far, we've seen the 100 mph max sustained wind for the storm and a max sustained wind on land (also at 10 m, I assume) of 77 mph, which is 23% less.  Historically, in hurricanes, is there some sort of average difference in max sustained wind measured on land, presumably at the coast vs. what is reported for the storm, itself, i.e., over water? 

  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_gradient

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! I also found a very nice description of this on wikipedia. For Arthur, so far, we've seen the 100 mph max sustained wind for the storm and a max sustained wind on land (also at 10 m, I assume) of 77 mph, which is 23% less. Historically, in hurricanes, is there some sort of average difference in max sustained wind measured on land, presumably at the coast vs. what is reported for the storm, itself, i.e., over water?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_gradient

I would imagine it's hard to say since sometimes reporting stations are far away from landfall locations. Also hurricanes seem to have different characteristics in terms of mixing winds down. Having been through Irene and Sandy there were many differences. From what I saw Irene had more of a uniform wind and Sandy was much more gusty, lots of lulls and huge gusts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine it's hard to say since sometimes reporting stations are far away from landfall locations. Also hurricanes seem to have different characteristics in terms of mixing winds down. Having been through Irene and Sandy there were many differences. From what I saw Irene had more of a uniform wind and Sandy was much more gusty, lots of lulls and huge gusts.

i concur about sandy here in Edison.  Relatively calm to 60-80 mph and back down repeatedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!  I also found a very nice description of this on wikipedia. For Arthur, so far, we've seen the 100 mph max sustained wind for the storm and a max sustained wind on land (also at 10 m, I assume) of 77 mph, which is 23% less.  Historically, in hurricanes, is there some sort of average difference in max sustained wind measured on land, presumably at the coast vs. what is reported for the storm, itself, i.e., over water? 

  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_gradient

 

It's important to note that 77 mph was the peak 10-minute average wind speed (indeed at the 10m height - 9.8m to be exact, according to the NDBC), and that the NHC uses the peak 1-minute average wind speed, such that the 100 mph figure is a 1-min average. Also, 77 mph was the peak 10-minute average from obs sampled and archived at 10-minute intervals - so it's possible that a somewhat stronger 10-minute average occurred in between observations. But more important is the difference between peak 10-min winds and peak 1-minute winds; since the 1-min average varies much more than the 10-min average, the peak 1-min value is always higher. Exactly how much higher a peak 1-min speed is than a peak 10-min speed can be estimated via a conversion factor (unfortunately, I don't know what the factor is off the top of my head, but there are studies on the topic). 

 

That said, Cape Lookout probably didn't get into the max winds. I think the idea thrown around by others here about Hatteras Island getting closer to the max winds later is correct - it should get more squarely into the eastern eyewall. But I'm not sure if any of the stations on Hatteras are as well-exposed as the Cape Lookout station, which seems to be in a perfect spot. That 77 G 101 is a beautiful ob. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alex Lamers seems to think that the 77 mph wind was a 2 minute sustained reading.

https://twitter.com/alexjlamers/status/484906343674167296

Sent from my iPhone

 

It's a bit confusing with the NDBC stations, but I think the current wind speed reported at the hourly obs is a 2-min speed and the continuous winds data (from which the 77 mph ob was pulled) is a 10-min speed.

 

Here's the continuous winds data showing the 77 mph ob (in m/s): http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/data/5day2/CLKN7_5day.cwind

Here's the description of continuous winds data: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/measdes.shtml#cwind

 

So I'm pretty sure the 77 was a 10-min average. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Also,

 

WSPD Wind speed (m/s) averaged over an eight-minute period for buoys and a two-minute period for land stations. Reported Hourly. See Wind Averaging Methods.

 

 

Yeah, I think this reflects the difference between the hourly obs and the continuous winds data. The NDBC stations with continuous winds data use two different averaging periods for two different sets of data. 

 

 

2 minute or 10 minute, either way is still pretty impressive.

Sent from my iPhone

 

 

Oh, of course. 10-min is even more impressive; and it seems that two consecutive 10-min obs were at 77 mph. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marshall Shepard just posted this paper on Birds and Hurricane eye's. Not the first time it's happened.

http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1407&context=geosciencefacpub

(Interesting - thanks for posting that!)

 

And a snippet from pg 7 of that paper:

"Hurricane Irene (2011) was the first well-structured

tropical cyclone to make landfall within the domain of

an operational polarimetric WSR-88D weather radar."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...