Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,530
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    northernriwx
    Newest Member
    northernriwx
    Joined

Feb 22 Snow Threat


WxUSAF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 994
  • Created
  • Last Reply

JI has proven he is Met quality

you ought to be ashamed of yourself

give him the red tag and stfu

lol

On a more serious note, it is interesting that this forum isn't hotter than it is. The latest Euro just gave us a really nice shot of snow, it would be about 3-5 or so taken verbatim and depending where you are. The GFS is not that far off decent snow and the NAM is somewhere in that vicinity.

Where the heck is everybody?

:scooter:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitch, everytime I think it is something to get excited about, someone works to squash optimism. The 12z runs today sure seem to keep the real chance of an accumulating snow a possiblity, which is great. I am guessing people are feeling like they've been burned enough this winter to bother hoping that this verifies, but, hey, it looks like a chance at 3-6, and I am all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z NAM looks kind of iffy so far. Looks weaker with the second wave but we'll see.

it looses the system, almost completely

throw it out as it looks nothing like anything else

NAM does that post 48 hrs sometimes

EDIT: Unless, of course, all the other modeling starts to go that way, but we'll have to wait for 0Z to make that decision

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The model has trended weaker each of the last two runs. Even for BWI, at 12Z the nam only gave them .23 as snow. The gfs only .11. DCA and IAD had about .15 or so from both models and the 18Z nam looks even more tepid and would argue for less than an inch for DC. It's going to be hard to resurrect the 06Z model run results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The model has trended weaker each of the last two runs. Even for BWI, at 12Z the nam only gave them .23 as snow. The gfs only .11. DCA and IAD had about .15 or so from both models and the 18Z nam looks even more tepid and would argue for less than an inch for DC. It's going to be hard to resurrect the 06Z model run results.

The NAM hints that someone in a narrow ribbon on the north side of DC to southern Montgomery county could have a few hours of

snow accummulating on grassy surfaces and on bar-b-que grill tops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The model has trended weaker each of the last two runs. Even for BWI, at 12Z the nam only gave them .23 as snow. The gfs only .11. DCA and IAD had about .15 or so from both models and the 18Z nam looks even more tepid and would argue for less than an inch for DC. It's going to be hard to resurrect the 06Z model run results.

at 54+ hrs., its got plenty of time the way things have changed so much T-24hrs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...