Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. You dont even live here in winter. You essentially hate winter. Oh and this storm was a great storm for the central ohio crew but it was short of 20" so if it was here you'd be complaining. I know, because you had many critiques when Detroit had a 16.7" storm in 2015.
  3. That's what they said this last storm...until we were dry-slotted for 6-8 hours - No telling the glacier we could have had. Granted this is a different storm setup- but it seems as of late whatever models say, it's always way overdone. I think at one point for today the low was supposed to -8, ended up at 12 (20 degree difference) - Granted it's cold as all get out, but nothing is verifying as modeled. Again, that is more upstate of SC, it maybe verifying perfectly everywhere else, but here - not close.
  4. I'd lock that mfer up right now and wouldn't gamble.
  5. They are just being slow in updating the PNS. Not sure why it’s THAT slow, but they already announced on social media some of the storm totals so the entire thing is included.
  6. I hope we score something because right now most models give .10 qpf the next 10-15 days. That ranks in bottom 10% of all periods with a mean temperature at or below what they are predicting for averag temperature Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk
  7. I think the AFD is by far the best and most succent analysis of this setup possible: KEY MESSAGE 3...Monitoring the potential for a coastal system this weekend. Very favorable storm patten in terms of analogs for big snows in the Mid-Atlantic this weekend. A 50/50 low & -NAO, Idaho Ridge, blocking over the Hudson Bay, and trough moving into the east Pac. Couldn`t ask for a better synoptic setup, but the formation of a storm remains in the details of this highly sensitive pattern. Guidance continues to show a Miller A type Nor`easter (it has been a while for one to form, let alone show up in model guidance). While the ceiling is certainly high for this storm, there is equally if not higher odds it just skirts out to see as indicated by the latest 00Z guidance and ensembles. Future runs will have to be seen if this is a trend or noise. How the TPV evolves will be one of the biggest factors on if this storm comes to fruition or not and impacts land. Regardless, expect fluctuations over the next day or two until the pattern is better sampled as associated energy is onshore across the western US.
  8. A long way to go. Maybe it ends up being a whiff. But this is where I want the GFS at this stage.
  9. We need NoGaps back.. always a good model to know if models are too far east… weenie book page 6 .
  10. Another blockbuster run but I of course I do not expect this to hold.
  11. 102h- closed off low over east TN Looks like it's about 50 miles east across the board
  12. No way Wait, that reminds me of the Canadian last night
  13. lower Chessy I see a 28" max that was 150 miles south 2 runs ago. lower astern shore went kaboom
  14. i do not think i have ever seen a model run that extreme since the days of the DGEX for 2016.
  15. If you consider 14 inches for dc back…..yes it’s back.
  16. Read more and post less for now. There are dozens of model runs throughout the day and locking in any one model solution 72+ hours out is foolish. I suggest reading the NWS discussions each day and learning from the seasoned folks on this board. Saying “congrats X location” or “way east” after each run will get a lot of buns thrown your way.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...