Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

January General Banter Thread II


Marion_NC_WX

Recommended Posts

woo hoo! just got up and have checked a few things, but still trying to wake up (although when i saw the widespread wsw i certainly perked up quickly lol)

still looking good for a lot of us - snow atl to athn north

:snowman: :snowman: noticed that finger of moisture in n ga, and yes this is a weenie imby comment, i sure hope that verifies :popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 976
  • Created
  • Last Reply

BOOM for some......

woo hoo! just got up and have checked a few things, but still trying to wake up (although when i saw the widespread wsw i certainly perked up quickly lol)

still looking good for a lot of us - snow atl to athn north

:snowman: :snowman: noticed that finger of moisture in n ga, and yes this is a weenie imby comment, i sure hope that verifies :popcorn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lady on GMA said 4-6 inches of snow would be the biggest storm in Atlanta since 1940? That's not right, is it? March '93? I felt confident that I remembered bigger snow there, but maybe not.

As usual...they are useless...In 93, Atlanta was on the cusp...Marietta 10-12"...Hartsfield 4"...Mar 23-24, 1980 had 7.9" but it was pure dynamically driven glop...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Central NC people. The 12Z NAM really was not that bad of a run. It does shift higher amounts closer to us. Total precip is probably around .3 liquid, but there always seems to be a shift of higher amounts northward during the storm (i.e. southern Virginia is slated to get very little and they end up under WSW).

06z GFS was way better... over .5"... and the 06z NAM was less than .25" but then got wetter at 12z. If the 12z GFS humors us we might be in business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

06z GFS was way better... over .5"... and the 06z NAM was less than .25" but then got wetter at 12z. If the 12z GFS humors us we might be in business.

Yes but I think we are blinded by the high snow amounts to our SW. It is very cold right now. Ground temps (and pavement) are freezing. They will still be freezing for this event. If we end up with close to .25 liquid freezing rain (and we could with the main event and then a full day of freezing drizzle), it will be a nightmare on the roads. That would be a big event in itself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

06z GFS was way better... over .5"... and the 06z NAM was less than .25" but then got wetter at 12z. If the 12z GFS humors us we might be in business.

Well HPC said throw out the 12z NAM. Even so I think we will approach .5" of QPF with a little snow, sleet and frzn. Nothing like what burger and foothills are going to see, they look golden. One of these days we will be In the sweet spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well HPC said throw out the 12z NAM. Even so I think we will approach .5" of QPF with a little snow, sleet and frzn. Nothing like what burger and foothills are going to see, they look golden. One of these days we will be In the sweet spot.

Remember how well throwing out the 12z gfs during the christmas storm went rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember how well throwing out the 12z gfs during the christmas storm went rolleyes.gif

And, I'm probably reading this wrong, but I'm reading it's for things that are modeled after our event:

PREFERENCE: AFTER 00Z TUE...GFS OR ECWMF

THE NAM INITIALIZES THE BASE OF THE SHORTWAVE TROUGH OVER

OREGON/IDAHO APPROXIMATELY 25 NM TOO FAR NORTH...WHICH CONTRIBUTES

TO AN INCREASINGLY SLOW AND DEEP SOLUTION ENTERING THE OHIO VALLEY

LATE IN THE FORECAST CYCLE COMPARED TO GFS/ECMWF WHICH ARE WEAKER

AND MORE PROGRESSIVE. THUS...THE NAM IS DISCOUNTED BEGINNING 00Z

TUE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just flew into ATL in the past hour or so. high clouds moving in from SW. Interesting obs on the way in.....winds at upper levels slightly stronger than progged further SW we flew coming from the NE this am. Stronger upper levels mean anything to the mets here??? Just an interesting tidbit i thought. Finish up at about 5pm today and will be really fun overnight tonight....gonna break out some sleds for tommorow!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't on the boards prior to the Christmas storm so I'm wondering which model was the most accurate so close to the start of it. I mean, which model should we really rely on and which model (or models) should we ignore? It seems like there are varying opinions about which one is the most reliable closest to the event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, I'm probably reading this wrong, but I'm reading it's for things that are modeled after our event:

PREFERENCE: AFTER 00Z TUE...GFS OR ECWMF

THE NAM INITIALIZES THE BASE OF THE SHORTWAVE TROUGH OVER

OREGON/IDAHO APPROXIMATELY 25 NM TOO FAR NORTH...WHICH CONTRIBUTES

TO AN INCREASINGLY SLOW AND DEEP SOLUTION ENTERING THE OHIO VALLEY

LATE IN THE FORECAST CYCLE COMPARED TO GFS/ECMWF WHICH ARE WEAKER

AND MORE PROGRESSIVE. THUS...THE NAM IS DISCOUNTED BEGINNING 00Z

TUE

correct, its discussing the system over the rockies currently... so its not necessary relevant to our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just flew into ATL in the past hour or so. high clouds moving in from SW. Interesting obs on the way in.....winds at upper levels slightly stronger than progged further SW we flew coming from the NE this am. Stronger upper levels mean anything to the mets here??? Just an interesting tidbit i thought. Finish up at about 5pm today and will be really fun overnight tonight....gonna break out some sleds for tommorow!!!!!

Where were you flying and what level did you note this difference? Could have some interesting implications. weight_lift.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...