Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,662
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    tmcandrew
    Newest Member
    tmcandrew
    Joined

Junorch obs and discussion 2026


 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

But the CAPE is too low!  "Only" 1291!  Lapse rates not high by Midwest standards.  So it works there but not here?  :D

I wonder if we see a small high risk on the new D1. That is a wild environment that will be evolving today. That is a very elongated line of supercells which develop ahead of the cold front later and not to mention supercells which develop along and ride parallel to the front and will be ingesting destabilizing air from the south. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

drier air aloft also looks to be an issue down this way 

We’re advecting warmer air aloft 700-500. Usually not a good sign for SNE unless we had very warm temps. Definitely red flags as usual in SNE but kinematics are there. Like I said, get us over 80. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

I wonder if we see a small high risk on the new D1. That is a wild environment that will be evolving today. That is a very elongated line of supercells which develop ahead of the cold front later and not to mention supercells which develop along and ride parallel to the front and will be ingesting destabilizing air from the south. 

Doubt it but today should be nice regardless out there. Destructive tag on that latest severe thunderstorm warning out in Iowa. 

As for here, expectations kept in check for tomorrow. Not expecting much down this way. 

Whatever ejects out of the Midwest this weekend looks modestly intriguing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, vortex95 said:

I would caution this does not always work well.  June 2, 1990 has a big tor outbreak in the Great Lakes/Midwest/OH Valley w/ IN getting absolutely crushed w/ 37 tor in the state (more than the 1974 Superoutbreak).  66 tor in this event w/ 7 F4s, and forecasts were big for NY/PA and New England for June 3, and a complete bust.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_1990_Lower_Ohio_Valley_tornado_outbreak

mm... this doesn't lower the value nor significance of the statistical correlation - which is synoptic/ holistic in scale. 

Not a discrete convective level/meso analysis/indicator.  Which there are no known telecons that can be that predictively discrete.  For obvious reasons... 

The point is that the set ups tend to move that incremental spatial-temporal range in the 24 hour window.

Hell, not every +PNA/-NAO creates a winter storm here, either, and that's dealing with scales that are far more obvious to the physics.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

MAV 76 for BOS tomorrow

MET 66 (and thats the evening)

NBM 81

must be a front or something nearby tomorrow :lol: 

Yeah.. this is what I was suggesting to you yesterday ... there's a warm boundary that the Euro and GFS are less coherently defining.  The NAM on the other hand is kinking the PP enough to suggest a triple point goes underneath Logan. 

I have seen both scenarios verify in situations like this.  I am not presently seeing anything that argues for either. About split.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...