WxWatcher007 Posted Saturday at 05:51 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:51 PM And 500mb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted Saturday at 06:15 PM Share Posted Saturday at 06:15 PM Absolute ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 06:23 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 06:23 PM 7 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Absolute assey It may be hard to get too many inside runners with that look, though....IF THE MODEL IS RIGHT...pretty big time -NAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 06:27 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 06:27 PM 48 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Sept 2026: Sept 2023: 58 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I'm not concerned about that at all. We'll need it the year, IMHO....will be the difference between infrastructure-paralyzing paste and wind-swept sheets of rain. That is absurd for February....like 2010, stuff. 51 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Problem is I don't buy it given the magnitude and orientation of El Niño along with the QBO and solar cycle...it was kind of doing the same thing in Sept. 2023. Feb 2024 ended up with a +1.09 NAO.... +.76 DJFM mean NAO, so it whiffed on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted Saturday at 07:09 PM Share Posted Saturday at 07:09 PM @40/70 Benchmark do you think the current volcanic eruption will impact things at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 08:43 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 08:43 PM 1 hour ago, WxWatcher007 said: @40/70 Benchmark do you think the current volcanic eruption will impact things at all? Doesn't appear as though it will have a major impact: To see how Anak Krakatau's potential output stacks up against historical climate-altering eruptions, see the table below: Volcano / Eruption Event Approximate \(SO_{2}\) Mass Released Global Climate Impact 1991 Mount Pinatubo ~20,000,000 tons Decreased global temperatures by 0.5 °C for 2 years 1883 Krakatau Eruption ~20,000,000 tons of Sulfur Decreased global temperatures by 1.2 °C 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai ~400,000 tons Minimal cooling (dominated by historic water vapor injection) 2018 Anak Krakatau Eruption ~173,000 tons Localized atmospheric/weather effects only Typical Anak Krakatau Daily Output ~190 tons/day No measurable climate impact 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted Saturday at 08:44 PM Share Posted Saturday at 08:44 PM 3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Doesn't appear as though it will have a major impact: To see how Anak Krakatau's potential output stacks up against historical climate-altering eruptions, see the table below: Volcano / Eruption Event Approximate \(SO_{2}\) Mass Released Global Climate Impact 1991 Mount Pinatubo ~20,000,000 tons Decreased global temperatures by 0.5 °C for 2 years 1883 Krakatau Eruption ~20,000,000 tons of Sulfur Decreased global temperatures by 1.2 °C 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai ~400,000 tons Minimal cooling (dominated by historic water vapor injection) 2018 Anak Krakatau Eruption ~173,000 tons Localized atmospheric/weather effects only Typical Anak Krakatau Daily Output ~190 tons/day No measurable climate impact this table says 2018? In any case, I saw a report that concluded Anak Krakatau's recent eruption plume went only 13% the height of Pinatubo, so likely talking about a substantially smaller impact if that figure is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 09:02 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 09:02 PM 17 minutes ago, Cobalt said: this table says 2018? In any case, I saw a report that concluded Anak Krakatau's recent eruption plume went only 13% the height of Pinatubo, so likely talking about a substantially smaller impact if that figure is correct. No, the last column...2018 is a different eruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted Saturday at 09:42 PM Share Posted Saturday at 09:42 PM 38 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: No, the last column...2018 is a different eruption. Unless im misreading, that row's title says "typical Anak Krakatau Output", as in likely just averaging out its emissions over time. Doesn't look like there's estimated figures on 2026's eruption just yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 09:58 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 09:58 PM 21 minutes ago, Cobalt said: Unless im misreading, that row's title says "typical Anak Krakatau Output", as in likely just averaging out its emissions over time. Doesn't look like there's estimated figures on 2026's eruption just yet My bad, you're right. It seems like it was an eruption of moderate magnitude at best, though. I wouldn't anticipate major impacts. This is what I based that assumption on, which I should have pasted in addition to that chart for added context. How its Current Scale and Potential Rankings Compare Compared to its History: The current eruption has blasted an ash column 15 kilometers (50,000 feet) high into the atmosphere. This height mirrors the paroxysmal 2018 Anak Krakatau eruption, which ultimately released roughly 173,000 metric tons (173 kt) of \(SO_{2}\). If the 2026 eruption sustains this intensity, it could reach similar levels. [1, 2, 3] 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted Saturday at 10:02 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 10:02 PM Seems like this is similar to the 2018 eruption, which had a pretty trivial impact. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 12:59 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:59 AM No bueno...this is what Kev was getting at....if you're wondering why the EURO is warm despite a big -NAO, this is why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:00 AM 59 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: No bueno...this is what Kev was getting at....if you're wondering why the EURO is warm despite a big -NAO, this is why. It’s like a +++ EPO . A Viagra hard on that won’t go down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 02:22 AM Author Share Posted yesterday at 02:22 AM 21 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: It’s like a +++ EPO . A Viagra hard on that won’t go down Thing is, just as it likely overdoing the NAO, it could also be overdoing the EPO is we don't pop as large of a GOA as it indicates....which is possible given the residual cool ENSO residue. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted yesterday at 05:18 AM Share Posted yesterday at 05:18 AM 8 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Doesn't appear as though it will have a major impact: To see how Anak Krakatau's potential output stacks up against historical climate-altering eruptions, see the table below: Volcano / Eruption Event Approximate \(SO_{2}\) Mass Released Global Climate Impact 1991 Mount Pinatubo ~20,000,000 tons Decreased global temperatures by 0.5 °C for 2 years 1883 Krakatau Eruption ~20,000,000 tons of Sulfur Decreased global temperatures by 1.2 °C 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai ~400,000 tons Minimal cooling (dominated by historic water vapor injection) 2018 Anak Krakatau Eruption ~173,000 tons Localized atmospheric/weather effects only Typical Anak Krakatau Daily Output ~190 tons/day No measurable climate impact The hype on social media is ridiculous. Krakatoa's current eruption is *minor* overall. You get a bunch of these sized eruptions every year across the globe. Nothing to see here. "Oh, but Krakatoa is famous!" Yes, it is, but that does not mean it will do it again. Typical clickbait using familiarity as a draw. It erupted significantly larger than this in late 2018 and generated a significant tsunami, and still nothing of consequence globally. And not all eruptions are the same. You need a significant amount of SO2 for cooling. So you can have a VEI-5 (minimal for any sig global impacts) and not get much. Hunga-Tonga actually warmed the globe w/ a distinct delayed temp spike in 2023-24 as it ejected an enormous amount of WV into the stratosphere, which is normally very dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted yesterday at 01:31 PM Share Posted yesterday at 01:31 PM NMME 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 03:22 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 03:22 PM 10 hours ago, vortex95 said: The hype on social media is ridiculous. Krakatoa's current eruption is *minor* overall. You get a bunch of these sized eruptions every year across the globe. Nothing to see here. "Oh, but Krakatoa is famous!" Yes, it is, but that does not mean it will do it again. Typical clickbait using familiarity as a draw. It erupted significantly larger than this in late 2018 and generated a significant tsunami, and still nothing of consequence globally. And not all eruptions are the same. You need a significant amount of SO2 for cooling. So you can have a VEI-5 (minimal for any sig global impacts) and not get much. Hunga-Tonga actually warmed the globe w/ a distinct delayed temp spike in 2023-24 as it ejected an enormous amount of WV into the stratosphere, which is normally very dry. Yea, the VW effectively squashed the SO2 ink association with Tonga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 03:24 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 03:24 PM Cosgrove sure has an interesting take...heh. Seems to be going with a CANSIPS type outcome with massive AK/western Canadian and CONUS ridging. Big -EPO/PNA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted yesterday at 03:46 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:46 PM 12 hours ago, vortex95 said: Hunga-Tonga actually warmed the globe w/ a distinct delayed temp spike in 2023-24 as it ejected an enormous amount of WV into the stratosphere, which is normally very dry. I’m not disagreeing with you because I’m, myself, quite suspicious about the 1/15/22 Hunga-Tonga causing that delayed temp spike earlier in ‘23 than what the ‘23 El Niño should have caused. But if you were to post that in the CC forum, you’d get a lot of opposition or at least doubt based on past Hunga-Tonga discussions in there. Several folks there have downplayed it because they think the warming effect was minimal/far lower than that early ‘23 temp spike and they backed it up with at least one source fwiw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 03:47 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:47 PM 22 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Cosgrove sure has an interesting take...heh. Seems to be going with a CANSIPS type outcome with massive AK/western Canadian and CONUS ridging. Big -EPO/PNA. Dudes struggled for years . Kind of a mini JB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcmmKU Posted yesterday at 05:18 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:18 PM 3 hours ago, stadiumwave said: NMME rip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said: Dudes struggled for years . Kind of a mini JB Everyone struggles from time to time time, but not everyone admits it...he is one, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 53 minutes ago, MarcmmKU said: rip RIP as it pertains to a cold seasons with consistent retention, but a mild map with extremely high precipitation in the mean leaves snowfall pretty wide-open...aside from probably being able to eliminate the prospects for a top 10 season north of NYC. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 15 hours ago Author Share Posted 15 hours ago 5 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said: That actually isn't that bad....has you like 4-5" below average and me 5-6". I think we'd all take that. Makes more sense to the than the robust CANSIPS and early EURO run. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 11 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said: 1 storm can do wonders. Get ready. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago JMA DJF 500mb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago That actually isn't that bad....has you like 4-5" below average and me 5-6". I think we'd all take that. Makes more sense to the than the robust CANSIPS and early EURO run.-5 for me is still 50+" so would take in a heartbeat Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolri_wx Posted 14 minutes ago Share Posted 14 minutes ago Any analogs show up with strong El Nino’s with extraordinarily low Atlantic ACE’s the preceding tropical season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted 12 minutes ago Share Posted 12 minutes ago I speculate there will be lot of wish casting, meltdowns, and season cancellations. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now