Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,017
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

2026-2027 Record-breaking El Nino


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, jaxjagman said:

To muxh crap already going against this winter,You already have the -PDO at the end of August -1.1 which should be substainally positive right now in a strong NINO and the other is the strong WQBO which should have a chance ATM to be a brick SPV

Yea, the PV will probably be pretty stout, but there is more than one way to skin a cat....ie produce intervals of high latitude blocking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Hell, it has me at 2" under. That would be the most for me in 6 years. I'll take it.

Looking at the scale, you are right.....the colors make it look awful, but it's actually pretty reasonable...has me at like 5-6" under average, which is like mid-high 50s. Let me amend earlier what I said about a compromise.....def. prefer the EURO snowfall, though it could be light across the deep interior of NE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, the PV will probably pretty stout, but there is more than one way to skin a cat....ie produce intervals of high latitude blocking. 

 

Just now, jaxjagman said:

Just to add in 82-97-15,there has never been a SSWE into winter,left that out which should be noted

Well aware....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSW are overrated....they are often feast or famine....again, you don't need the PV to be decimated to get blocking. That is a misconception. W QBO obviously favors a stout PV, which makes it more impervious to heat propagation, so these seasons are prone to stratospheric reflection that can still get the job done. See latter January-early Feb 1983.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I anticipate a very mild first half, with a stout PV, PAC jet and +NAO....a shift should occur during January which will begin as an AK ridge acting as the catalyst for the first real arctic air of the season, and also ultimately act to trigger big NAO blocking in Feb via wave 1 reflection. 

You're definite talking about IMBY,while you had some freak strorm spawn up into the GOM into Feb of 83 the SE in most parts ran 4C AN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jaxjagman said:

You're definite talking about IMBY,while you had some freak strorm spawn up into the GOM into Feb of 83 the SE in most parts ran 4C AN

I assume you know that the warmest month of the winter of 1982-3 in the E US, including SE, was Dec by a wide margin. It was a bonafide torch, the only month like that in the SE to NE. The remainder in the SE was pretty close to normal to slightly BN in some areas.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:

The excitement of Fall is getting here. Regardless of what winter brings, Fall with its crisp air and color show is an amazing time of year for many of us. Its the perfect distraction for the pre-winter model circus, especially in a strong Nino year.

Yep I cant wait for hoodie and sweat pants season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TriPol said:

Everyone should remember... in winter, it only takes one storm. One blizzard, threading the eye of the needle, is all we need to have a great season. 

Yep just like Jan 2016.  That's one of the analog years everyone is throwing around ( 2015-2016 ).

Good thing is that the STJ will be very active so there shouldn't be a shortage of storms even if they are rain or a mix bag.

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/4/2026 at 1:04 PM, GaWx said:

Nino 1+2 (keep in mind that this is non-relative) had a strong rise yesterday. Get ready for a tweet from Adam, Abraham, and/or others addressing this saying record breaking yada yada yada. Keep in mind though that records from 1982-3 and 1997-8 are based on weeklies, not dailies. Also, highest relative WEEKLY in 1983 was +4.6 and in 1997 was +4.1. Let’s see where the current calendar week relative 1+2 on Monday. It won’t be anywhere near +4.6 although it may get close to +4.0.

IMG_2364.thumb.png.78fe725482a6818ded9cff924e88510e.png

 

 

 The latest relative weekly for Nino 1+2 comes in about where I expected, +3.9. This for the 2nd week in a row is at a record high (back to 1981) for the week, warmer than 1997’s +3.6 and 0.4 warmer than the previous week’s +3.5.

 The highest relative 1+2 on record for any week is +4.6 (1983) and the highest relative in 1997 for any week was +4.1, which was set twice.

 Regarding the relative for other regions, Nino 3 warmed barely while 3.4 and 4 stayed the same. The changes overall mean an even more E based Nino than the prior week showed:

  9AUG2026         3.2        2.5        1.8        0.0
 26AUG2026         3.5        2.6        1.8        0.1
 02SEP2026         3.9        2.7        1.8        0.1


 For comparison:

03SEP1997         3.6        2.8        2.0        0.4

 

 So, early Sept. ‘26 is slightly more E based than the previous most E based early Sept. (back to 1981) of 1997.

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jaxjagman said:

You're definite talking about IMBY,while you had some freak strorm spawn up into the GOM into Feb of 83 the SE in most parts ran 4C AN

Point is those "freak" storms are pretty common in this magnitude of El Nino....Feb 1983, January 2016 (which only grazed me), Dec 1997. The deck will be stacked in favor of a big fish, sorry I can't guarantee it will rake everyone.

The southeast doesn't look +4 to me.

cd170.63.193.132.249.6.0.59.prcp.pngcd170.63.193.132.249.6.2.37.prcp.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 The latest relative weekly for Nino 1+2 comes in about where I expected, +3.9. This for the 2nd week in a row is at a record high (back to 1981) for the week, warmer than 1997’s +3.6 and 0.4 warmer than the previous week’s +3.5.

 The highest relative 1+2 on record for any week is +4.6 (1983) and the highest relative in 1997 for any week was +4.1, which was set twice.

 Regarding the relative for other regions, Nino 3 warmed barely while 3.4 and 4 stayed the same. The changes overall mean an even more E based Nino than the prior week showed:

  9AUG2026         3.2        2.5        1.8        0.0
 26AUG2026         3.5        2.6        1.8        0.1
 02SEP2026         3.9        2.7        1.8        0.1


 For comparison:

03SEP1997         3.6        2.8        2.0        0.4

 

 So, early Sept. ‘26 is slightly more E based than the previous most E based early Sept. (back to 1981) of 1997.

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt

Yea, it's gone more east-based than I had envisioned, NVM guidance...which was way off. I don't love that, but like I have been saying, I don't think it makes much of a difference when it's this strong. If anything, it probably helps to limit any residual MC influence that would destructively interfere with potemtial big storm windows. So, while that probably puts the nail in the coffin on any hopes of avoiding a pretty mild season, it  may paradoxically help in terms of  landing that big fish.

I may have to shift from a basin-wide to east-based composite, which makes it more likely that the mean ridge ends up se of Hudson Bay.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, it's gone more east-based than I had envisioned, NVM guidance...which was way off. I don't love that, but like I have been saying, I don't think it makes much of a difference when it's this strong. If anything, it probably helps to limit MC that would destructively interfere with any big storm windows. So, while that probably puts the nail in the coffin on any hopes of avoiding a pretty mild season, it  may paradoxically help in terms of  landing that big fish.

I may have to shift from a basin-wide to east-based composite, which makes it more likely that the mean ridge ends up se of Hudson Bay.

Seems like modeling has been putting the ridge SE of Hudson Bay for a while. You can see it in the monthly temp forecasts off the Cfs2 as well as the snowfall forecast off the Euro with reduced snow along the coast from NE down into NC.

Cfs2 temps

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/CFSv2/htmls/usT2me3Mon.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Seems like modeling has been putting the ridge SE of Hudson Bay for a while. You can see it in the monthly temp forecasts off the Cfs2 as well as the snowfall forecast off the Euro with reduced snow along the coast from NE down into NC.

Cfs2 temps

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/CFSv2/htmls/usT2me3Mon.html

The CANSIPS and JMA have been further NW, but those models are off this year, I think. My extra tropical Pacific composite also hints at that possibility, but it's looking less likely now. We'll see....still time for region 4 to get back in the game and it should, eventually.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The CANSIPS and JMA have been further NW, but those models are off this year, I think. My extra tropical Pacific composite also hints at that possibility, but it's looking less likely now. We'll see....still time for region 4 to get back in the game and it should, eventually.

Once the Niño starts to weaken, there should be a return of the sst warmth back west with the trade's influence increasing. Of course, it won't be overnight, which is why a weakening of the Niño sooner than later improves our chances of decent snowfall imho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...