Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,475
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, winter_warlock said:

People probably won't agree, but to me is seemed like models were more accurate about 15 years ago compared to now. But that's just me

The data argues you are wrong. It could be that general patterns are more chaotic right now and that previously, models have KNOWN biases whereas now it's sort of just as likely to bust in any direction. But this opinion has been debunked plenty of times. The models were NOT more accurate 15 years ago. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

I’m on a phone so I could be totally wrong.  I think we all can agree, NAM doesn’t mean shit. 

definitely wasn’t saying one or the other was correct. Someone said it looked like the gfs so I had to look.  Yes the ridge out west may be a smidge taller, but in the grand scheme of things, the larger scale trough was progressive and not what we would need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Try I-95 from Emporia to South of the Border. I kinda wanna wreck on purpose every time I go down to see my mom. 

Made that drive too many damn times, including about 3 in 2025. I’d argue all the way to Savannah. You almost feel a sense of relief once you get off SC’s loud ass highway in need of a resurfacing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

The data argues you are wrong. It could be that general patterns are more chaotic right now and that previously, models have KNOWN biases whereas now it's sort of just as likely to bust in any direction. But this opinion has been debunked plenty of times. The models were NOT more accurate 15 years ago. 

Oh ok I had no idea that  the opinion was debunked.  Maybe it's just the fact we had more storms back then us throwing me off . But either way thanks for the correction! B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, winter_warlock said:

Oh ok I had no idea that  the opinion was debunked.  Maybe it's just the fact we had more storms back then us throwing me off . But either way thanks for the correction! B)

It could be a myriad of things. But also - things that are on like decadal cycles may be to blame. Consider that the modeling tends to be more stable at range for southern stream dominant systems. For many years now there has been a lot of northern stream influence - which the models objectively (not subjectively) are worse at predicting.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

It could be a myriad of things. But also - things that are on like decadal cycles may be to blame. Consider that the modeling tends to be more stable at range for southern stream dominant systems. For many years now there has been a lot of northern stream influence - which the models objectively (not subjectively) are worse at predicting.

Anything beyond 5 days was long range 15 years ago. There were fewer publicly available models, some of which ran only once or twice a day. Most people viewed models on the NCEP site instead of 3rd party vendors where you can quickly toggle between models & runs. Social media was also in its infancy. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eduggs said:

Anything beyond 5 days was long range 15 years ago. There were fewer publicly available models, some of which ran only once or twice a day. Most people viewed models on the NCEP site instead of 3rd party vendors where you can quickly toggle between models & runs. Social media was also in its infancy. 

Related to this, you also didn't have all the various derived fields, etc., that these vendors now have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eduggs said:

Anything beyond 5 days was long range 15 years ago. There were fewer publicly available models, some of which ran only once or twice a day. Most people viewed models on the NCEP site instead of 3rd party vendors where you can quickly toggle between models & runs. Social media was also in its infancy. 

Yea we don’t really get the crazy surprise storms anymore. The models also do a better job at drying up northern stream systems as they cross the mountains. Those types of systems were a source of busts back in the day. One of the presentations at the AMS in New Orleans mentioned how there’s gradual improvements in modeling even up to day 10.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...