Central PA Winter 25/26 Discussion and Obs

[AccuChris]

0z 3km NAM QPF is pretty paltry


.

[mahantango#1]

3 minutes ago, AccuChris said:

0z 3km NAM QPF is pretty paltry


.

Everything fading away?

[AccuChris]

Everything fading away?

Too soon to tell. This is one run of one model but will need to see what the rest of the 0z suite shows


.

[Jns2183]

My brother got my daughter and I , a nephew of his dog. Pure Husky. I had to put my dog down a year ago. He was alive before my daughter was born. He knew I was looking for one because I thought it was the right time with her almost 11. Yeah I definitely shed some tears with this one. My daughter is on cloud 9.

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk

[Jns2183]

Gfs says get ready for true ice storm

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk

[Jns2183]

Merry Christmas to all

Apparently the nuclear tests in the 60s had a significant impact on weather. We all know what that impact was in this area.

https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/205424677/PrecipMod_Paper_preprint.pdf

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk

[Ruin]

3 hours ago, AccuChris said:

0z 3km NAM QPF is pretty paltry


.

lol omfg models are pathetic ok hold up before you bash me. We go from one model run that produces .50-1.00 of liquid to now 0.05 for a vast majority of the state? We deserve better this isnt even a advisory lvl event. If each model run over lets say 4-5 of the same model showed less and less ok id accept it. But 1 model run to the next and it just vanishes like a fart in the wind? The National Weather Service (NWS) operates on an annual budget of roughly 1.3-1.4 billion dollars yearly. When they do get it wrong which is more often then many want to admit nothing happens people accept the weather forecast was wrong. we deserve better then this has the outcome happen yet? No but what the hell is with all the flopping like a dead fish with model all the dang time?