Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,984
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Falian6029
    Newest Member
    Falian6029
    Joined

2025 Severe Weather General Discussion


Kmlwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, high risk said:

The NAM Nest is the gold standard.  The HiresW ARW2 is decent.  HRRR and especially the HiresW FV3 are the worst.  When they both showed the warm front staying south of DC yesterday, I started writing off severe potential up our way. 

Are there any good resources to learn little things like this, or is it all just time, experience, and networking? It feels like there’s still so much to learn. I should practice forecasting while I’m not doing anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rhino16 said:

Are there any good resources to learn little things like this, or is it all just time, experience, and networking? It feels like there’s still so much to learn. I should practice forecasting while I’m not doing anything.

       Experience, for sure.    I always look at as much available guidance as I can, and when they don't agree, I make mental notes on which ones did well and which didn't.   It's not as tough to keep track of as it sounds.   

       Or you can just cheat and use AI:   :Dimage.thumb.png.5103f08338130931af214dc6cf17ccc5.png

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

June 2008 is still showing on the 12z updates to the CIPS guidance. Interestingly, if you sort solely by 500mb rather than all fields, it is the top analog with a score of 0.918. While I doubt we realize that high end of a threat - it's definitely got my attention. Worth noting that some of the neighboring domains on there also have June 4-5 2008 showing up as well.

Obvious questions remain in regards to day-of factors like instability - but my interest level has risen a bit. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2025 at 1:09 PM, Kmlwx said:

June 2008 is still showing on the 12z updates to the CIPS guidance. Interestingly, if you sort solely by 500mb rather than all fields, it is the top analog with a score of 0.918. While I doubt we realize that high end of a threat - it's definitely got my attention. Worth noting that some of the neighboring domains on there also have June 4-5 2008 showing up as well.

Obvious questions remain in regards to day-of factors like instability - but my interest level has risen a bit. 

The end of the 18z HRRR for Saturday afternoon DOES look a little interesting (yes fantasy range HRRR, I know... plus, verbatim, weak MLLRs and a saturated atmosphere in general limiting DCAPE).

ETA: Others CAMs show hints of us being backdoored by a cool front by late Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

 

 

              Lots of things obviously need to align, but that's certainly what we want to see if we're hunting derechos.       We would be well within the hot, humid air mass, but also just barely within the faster flow aloft, giving organized convective systems the opportunity to race to the east-southeast.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NCAR AI convective page is highlighting some impressive severe potential next Thursday...honestly very impressed with how robust it is this far out...(link below) 

https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/projects/ncar_ensemble/ainwp/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3_KcoSRHWhY1lxCTCfOqSNC0AD8SUSmL_c7R_N8rtpvo-PsNNvuY3vuI4_aem_Stpgx3ntIqB8IVErFY76cQ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

The NCAR AI convective page is highlighting some impressive severe potential next Thursday...honestly very impressed with how robust it is this far out...(link below) 

https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/projects/ncar_ensemble/ainwp/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3_KcoSRHWhY1lxCTCfOqSNC0AD8SUSmL_c7R_N8rtpvo-PsNNvuY3vuI4_aem_Stpgx3ntIqB8IVErFY76cQ

45%... impressive indeed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, yoda said:

45%... impressive indeed 

From watching this tool this spring so far - it seems like it way overdoes things - I'm not even sure it works on the same percentages as SPC...so take those maps with a grain (or a handful) of salt. I've been using it more of a "first look" at which days to look at closer. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, high risk said:

 

              Lots of things obviously need to align, but that's certainly what we want to see if we're hunting derechos.       We would be well within the hot, humid air mass, but also just barely within the faster flow aloft, giving organized convective systems the opportunity to race to the east-southeast.

We also need a respectable 500 mb pattern. Looks like the "best" climo is one that features a ridge flexing NW -> SE from Kentucky to Bermuda. Kinda of laying the train tracks for us.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

FWIW, this is what is looked like just to the N of College Park at 5pm today.  It tried for a brief time.  Define supercell with a long inflow band to the E.

I had to take this pix through a window.  :angry:
 

IMG_3257.JPG

Yeah. That cell definitely has a little bit of a supercell appearance on radar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at these GIF loops from late this aftn.  Classic supercell split mirror pair in
n-cntrl MD.

The left split accelerates and moves N, and the right split moves ESE and is
slow-moving.
 
In a more unidirectional environmental flow w/ wind shear, the supercell
splits both have an equal chance of surviving.  Most of the time tho when
there is directional shear present, it is veering w/ height, so that favors 
the right mover (cyclonic meso), and the left mover (anticyclonic meso) 
does not last long.  
 
Supercells by default split, but often since the right split is so favored
so often from the shear profile, the left split never has a chance and is 
wiped immediately, so you see nothing on radar!
 
And when overall flow is weak/disorganized over an area, the mesoscale
takes over, leading to some odd storm motions and evolutions, as we see
today.
 

radarloop2.GIF

radarloop1.gif

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lash Flood Warning
DCC001-MDC031-033-VAC013-059-510-610-140400-
/O.NEW.KLWX.FF.W.0033.250614T0011Z-250614T0400Z/
/00000.0.ER.000000T0000Z.000000T0000Z.000000T0000Z.OO/

BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
Flash Flood Warning
National Weather Service Baltimore MD/Washington DC
811 PM EDT Fri Jun 13 2025

The National Weather Service in Sterling Virginia has issued a

* Flash Flood Warning for...
  District of Columbia...
  Southeastern Montgomery County in central Maryland...
  Northwestern Prince Georges County in central Maryland...
  Arlington County in northern Virginia...
  Northern Fairfax County in northern Virginia...
  The City of Alexandria in northern Virginia...
  The City of Falls Church in northern Virginia...

* Until midnight EDT tonight.

* At 811 PM EDT, Doppler radar indicated thunderstorms producing
  heavy rain across the warned area. Between 1 and 3 inches of rain
  have fallen. The expected rainfall rate is 1.5 to 3 inches in 1
  hour. Additional rainfall amounts of 1 to 3 inches are possible in
  the warned area. Flash flooding is ongoing or expected t
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...