Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Long duration overrunning to coastal disco 02/07-02/09


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Would not be surprised to see Euro trend drier, obviously hoping not.

 

0z NAM cut back as well. Again, my impression is feature placement hasn't changed as much as overall qpf outside of northshore/Boston metro band. Not sure if that's a result of diminished coastal strength or what...

 

Indeed, Euro is drier like the rest of the 0z suite, except GFS.

Actually looks very close to 0z RGEM.

 

Feature placement not that much different from 12z Euro.

Still 12"+ inside of 128, max north shore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, Euro is drier like the rest of the 0z suite, except GFS.

Actually looks very close to 0z RGEM.

 

Feature placement not that much different from 12z Euro.

Still 12"+ inside of 128, max north shore.

12z EURO had max centered right over me, so if its inside of rt 128 now, it shifted.

I suspect it did.

 

Hopefully someone has that clown map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, Euro is drier like the rest of the 0z suite, except GFS.

Actually looks very close to 0z RGEM.

 

Feature placement not that much different from 12z Euro.

Still 12"+ inside of 128, max north shore.

It's actually not drier. Subtract the 0.1 that fell,12z-0z and it's identical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected, about 0.1 drier accounting for what's already fallen, otherwise same qpf.

And same placement. I'll take these down after we discuss:

12z

ecmwf_tprecip_boston_14.png

0z

ecmwf_tprecip_boston_13_0z.png

It's dry. I didn't get .3" today. It cut back as well but is still a good hit in the same General area. Also seems colder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected, about 0.1 drier accounting for what's already fallen, otherwise same qpf.

And same placement. I'll take these down after we discuss:

 

12z

attachicon.gifecmwf_tprecip_boston_14.png

 

0z

attachicon.gifecmwf_tprecip_boston_13_0z.png

nah it's slightly drier to significantly drier (over the Berks/E slope) unless a 20% reduction doesn't count as drier then gee someone needs to look closer

 

Thru 7pm today we didn't have .1 qpf fall. That has fallen from 7pm to 1am (6z)

 

The deeper yellow shadings are 1.4 to 1.6

 

they are now 1.2 to 1.4

 

Some people will never see a trend that Is less snowier or less bullish for snow, don't let that fool you. It still does look good. However it should be ok to mention something looks drier without the legion of snow lobbyists calling you insane lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol at quibbling over tenths, wth is going on.

dude it's discussion

 

if it was pro snow you'd be cheering it. .35 of 1.3  in berks is significant cut back , W ma didn't see more than .08 fall by 7pm tonight.

 

c'mon , You have a comment without fail on every single post that is not pro snow, even if it is deemed a great post by 2 mets later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And people bust MPM about being a QPF queen? Watch it stack Boston,watch it stack.

 

Hope you're right Ginxy.

Boston / north shore very well could stack Buffalo-style with the coastal front and ocean enhancement, but the more widespread 14-18 painted over most of MA seems to me at risk right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...