Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,515
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    12bet1 net
    Newest Member
    12bet1 net
    Joined

NYC/PHL 12/21-12/27 Forecast Threats


am19psu

Recommended Posts

Also, you are referencing the ridge axis way too late on your images. So it's actually further west when it matters.

fair enough...still i don't think it is ideall for the MECS/HECS depticted by the GFS...the pattern is definitely favorable for a snowfall of 4-8" though and i guess the blocking over the Hudson's Bay region would help to force more energy downstream to aide in the GFS solution, so yeah it is a possibility

gfs_500_120s.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 995
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This one will be painful if it fails given how consistent overall the GFS/Euro have been....the Mt. Holly discussion sort of seems to pump up the GEM, maybe my memory is bad but I swear that thing waffles more than any model I've ever seen from run to run yet they mention its consistent, the only storm I can clearly recall the GEM nailing big time was the 2/25 event this past winter.

well the GGEM had a monster bomb at 0Z last night with the h5 fields resembling Jan 8 1996....495_100.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM and GFS both went back to the northern, faster SW placement.

It's clear for this storm and for our area, this is what we want.

For the mid-Atlantic, the slower, more south, more diggier solution is better but too many things can go wrong with that.

I'm hoping 18z models got newer satellite data and now the storm will be a northern track like this.

0z tonight is very big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one will be painful if it fails given how consistent overall the GFS/Euro have been....the Mt. Holly discussion sort of seems to pump up the GEM, maybe my memory is bad but I swear that thing waffles more than any model I've ever seen from run to run yet they mention its consistent, the only storm I can clearly recall the GEM nailing big time was the 2/25 event this past winter.

If I read it correctly they said it did well with the "swing and a miss" over this past weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fair enough...still i don't think it is ideall for the MECS/HECS depticted by the GFS...the pattern is definitely favorable for a snowfall of 4-8" though and i guess the blocking over the Hudson's Bay region would help to force more energy downstream to aide in the GFS solution, so yeah it is a possibility

gfs_500_120s.gif

The PNA Ridge is definitely helping, although the ridge axis is too far east for some in the MA, its still relatively rare to have something like that in such a strong nina.

We have not had one so far this month and as a result little snow for 195. What the PNA ridge does is it eseentially shelters the energy for the storm from the fast Pac flow that would otherwise tear it apart. This ridge instead drives the pacific flow up into a strong meridial flow into canada, then down the backside of the ridge. This will, again, shelter the storm and allow it to dig without disruption.

That is why were talking about a big storm threat. If we did not have this feature, we would not have this storm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I read it correctly they said it did well with the "swing and a miss" over this past weekend.

Overall it did, thats correct, it may have had one run that was almost a hit if I recall but that was all, it was never really close, but in the long run I've always found its worse than the Euro/GFS on coastal systems, especially Miller Bs, it tends to be better with Miller As from what I've noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HPC said that they believe the northern stream will be stronger and therefore have more influence on this storm, which makes more sense.

NAM and GFS both went back to the northern, faster SW placement.

It's clear for this storm and for our area, this is what we want.

For the mid-Atlantic, the slower, more south, more diggier solution is better but too many things can go wrong with that.

I'm hoping 18z models got newer satellite data and now the storm will be a northern track like this.

0z tonight is very big.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a definition I found in pretty technical terms

Cold Conveyor Belt (CCB)

The cold conveyor belt (marked CCB in the figure above) originates poleward and east of the low pressure center, typically in the westerly flow on the backside of a high pressure system to the east. This air flows westward, on the cold side of the warm front, below the WCB, toward the center of the low pressure circulation. The air becomes saturated through a combination of precipitation falling into the CCB from the WCB above and slow ascent from the boundary layer to the mid-troposphere north of the low center (see figure above). The flow eventually rises and turn anticyclonically into the upper tropospheric ridge ahead of the developing cyclone.

I'm not exactly sure, some other experienced people on here probably know though. All I know is that the CCB is where the bands of heavy snow are during an east coast storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a definition I found in pretty technical terms

Cold Conveyor Belt (CCB)

The cold conveyor belt (marked CCB in the figure above) originates poleward and east of the low pressure center, typically in the westerly flow on the backside of a high pressure system to the east. This air flows westward, on the cold side of the warm front, below the WCB, toward the center of the low pressure circulation. The air becomes saturated through a combination of precipitation falling into the CCB from the WCB above and slow ascent from the boundary layer to the mid-troposphere north of the low center (see figure above). The flow eventually rises and turn anticyclonically into the upper tropospheric ridge ahead of the developing cyclone.

ok and now in english.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is 0z tomorrow night...and they day after....and the day after....and the day after....

Yeah it's pretty funny. There is no "big" model run 5 days before a storm. Have to get quite a bit closer before we call any runs big. Remember for this storm that just missed us, a Euro run buried us just a couple days before the storm. We know how that worked out, so it's downright silly to think model runs now are that important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall it did, thats correct, it may have had one run that was almost a hit if I recall but that was all, it was never really close, but in the long run I've always found its worse than the Euro/GFS on coastal systems, especially Miller Bs, it tends to be better with Miller As from what I've noticed.

I agree, but that was their reasoning since the models are all over the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it's pretty funny. There is no "big" model run 5 days before a storm. Have to get quite a bit closer before we call any runs big. Remember for this storm that just missed us, a Euro run buried us just a couple days before the storm. We know how that worked out, so it's downright silly to think model runs now are that important.

As the wave gets closer to the CA coast and eventually onshore the overall depictions are more accurate, once that thing is onshore I doubt we'll see any major changes, even the last event was more or less confirmed a miss once all the players were in range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the wave gets closer to the CA coast and eventually onshore the overall depictions are more accurate, once that thing is onshore I doubt we'll see any major changes, even the last event was more or less confirmed a miss once all the players were in range.

Comes ashore in T-48

Until then, let the (moderate) madness continue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Approximately what run will all the players be in place?

As the wave gets closer to the CA coast and eventually onshore the overall depictions are more accurate, once that thing is onshore I doubt we'll see any major changes, even the last event was more or less confirmed a miss once all the players were in range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS says all the snow gets washed away in a flooding new years day rainstorm before frigid air returns

lots of potential with the new years storm...its something that even though its very far out their seems to be some form of consistency with it. Looks like repeat of late feb early march big snow followed by melting followed by heavy rain...bad combo...of course though its fantasy land :whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NOGAPS being more NW at 12 Z was an indication that this was going to come NW ...At least in my personal opinion!

I been hearing alot of this thread about the NOGAPS model, Can any point me to any paper where the NOGAPS has shown any skill in forecasting winter storms ? Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's not forget their is still quite a large model spread to this point. Even though several models have showed nice hits..even major hits last yesterday and today the GFS and EC seem to be in different camps with regards to how they achieve their respective soultons. I was pleased at 12z that the GFS had seemed to trend towards the 00z euro but now at 18z its changed its tune again. The 12z euro also changed from its 00z solution. Let's see some continuity out of the models before we give grab on to one particular solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...