HailMan06 Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 ^ Looks like a +NAO on roids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 25, 2015 Share Posted July 25, 2015 ^ Looks like a +NAO on roids. Keep in mind the below normal shades are relative to 1880 values. I don't even... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Keep in mind the below normal shades are relative to 1880 values. I don't even...Does the model show how much the global average would increase without an AMOC slowdown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Hansen is a tool... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Does the model show how much the global average would increase without an AMOC slowdown? No In my opinion, that would not be useful for future planners because we already observe AMOC slowdown. A world without AMOC slowdown such as 4-5C warmer is probably not possible regardless of how much CO2 is dumped in our lifetimes. At least for a very long time and Earth would need to permanently sustain GHG forcing through positive feedbacks for 1k years at least. By then, all the major ice sheets would be gone in entirety allowing the melt feedbacks to cease. In hindsight, this reveals how broad brushed and poor the IPCC analysis really was. It's why Jim had to sit on the sidelines for the past decade or so. Nobody believed him until the recent WAIS research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonger Posted July 26, 2015 Author Share Posted July 26, 2015 Paul Beckwith! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Paul Beckwith! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Hansen is a tool...What happened the replies calling out this post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 What happened the replies calling out this post? I don't see anything deleted in the mod cp from here...you must be thinking of another thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 I don't see anything deleted in the mod cp from here...you must be thinking of another thread.Yeah they're in the 2015 global temps thread. SOC and Stadiumwave made similar posts in both threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOfClimatology Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Paul Beckwith! Wasn't he the guy calling for an ice free arctic in 6 months? He's either an idiot or a closer denier trying to shame the science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Wasn't he the guy calling for an ice free arctic in 6 months? He's either an idiot or a closer denier trying to shame the science. He called for an ice free arctic in 2013...even as late as July that year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 The warming of the last 1.5 years & the NOAA hiatus busting paper has ignited life & boldness to alarmism in every thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 Really? When your profile says you joined Dec 22, 2014 and that you have made a total of 125 posts? Interesting funny, that's the same date tacoman made a bunch of snarky posts in the global temp thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 Wasn't he the guy calling for an ice free arctic in 6 months? He's either an idiot or a closer denier trying to shame the science. Sounds like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superjames1992 Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 WTF Time to move to Scotland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 If everyone used ignore there would be no discussion, FWIW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LithiaWx Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 I'm not convinced frontranger is tacoman. More like tacoman's whiney little brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 http://www.hindawi.com/journals/amete/2015/481834/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOfClimatology Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Sounds like you. The irony in this statement is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 The irony in this statement is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOfClimatology Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Lol, I think WeatherGuy#s is Paul Beckwith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Lol, I think WeatherGuy#s is Paul Beckwith. Have a good one all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nflwxman Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 What's up with the d*ck measuring contest in the sea ice forum? Haven't you guys realized noone cares about your credentials on the internet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob1 Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 What's up with the d*ck measuring contest in the sea ice forum? Haven't you guys realized noone cares about your credentials on the internet?Yeah, a lot of personal attacks that started over minute changes in OP model runs (wow, a run to run varience for the arctic region, how unprecedented... SMH) It's a shame as it's a good thread (even with the usual back and forth pissing contest over mildly subjective figures) but now it's just painful to read, let alone stumble across useful information about the actual state of the ice and pattern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOfClimatology Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 What's up with the d*ck measuring contest in the sea ice forum? Haven't you guys realized noone cares about your credentials on the internet? Reading childish stuff like this (below) gets old. apparently you are some draconian pseudo-denier nutjob. There are a few select posters who don't seem to add anything outside some hyperbole and half-arsed conjecture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 Battle of the Blizzards ongoing in the Arctic Sea Ice thread. Edit: I meant the Jim Hansen thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-K Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 denier profile http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/03/opinions/sutter-climate-skeptics-woodward-oklahoma/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvantHiatus Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 denier profile http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/03/opinions/sutter-climate-skeptics-woodward-oklahoma/index.html Denying an idea for the wrong reasons is unforgivable. They should just be upfront about the situation and admit they only disagree on economic grounds. Which is a legitimate concern, albeit one that must be surmounted eventually. This way of thinking is what we don't want. Everyone should be transparent in the 21st century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAD_Wedge_NC Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 Denying an idea for the wrong reasons is unforgivable. They should just be upfront about the situation and admit they only disagree on economic grounds. Which is a legitimate concern, albeit one that must be surmounted eventually. This way of thinking is what we don't want. Everyone should be transparent in the 21st century. Wow.... are you finally seeing the reality of what's happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now