Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,528
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Gonzalo00
    Newest Member
    Gonzalo00
    Joined

November Mid-Long Range Discussion


MillzPirate

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 556
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I was looking at the 12z Euro on the accuwx pay site that we subscribe to here at school. The cut off line for snow is the fall line. If your NW of that it's 1-3". If your northwest of the Carrol co./ S York co. hills then it's 3-6"

Make sure you look at the whole column and not just 850 and up. In reality the nam is pretty warm in the bl from 900mb on down to surface.

Yep, BWI/DCA is stuck in the mid-upper 30's. You have to be north of the fall line in order to get snow. Interesting note also, the nam is slower bringing in precip almost 12 hours later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure you look at the whole column and not just 850 and up. In reality the nam is pretty warm in the bl from 900mb on down to surface.

strange too since thicknesses are below 540 and drop during the event

well, even if we miss this one, it's nice to see this kind of system so early in the season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

strange too since thicknesses are below 540 and drop during the event

well, even if we miss this one, it's nice to see this kind of system so early in the season

The issue is in the 925-850mb layers on the models. the wind backs from the south, and thats deadly if you want a snowstorm. Also the 925 and 850mb lows, which seen below tracks overhead, you want to be north of that.

NAM_221_2012112418_F81_TMPC_925_MB.png

NAM_221_2012112418_F84_TMPC_850_MB.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vort is in a decent spot on the nam.. nam. meh. probably wrong.

post-1615-0-80925000-1353791616_thumb.gi

I wouldn't give the nam much consideration outside of 48 hrs. Once inside of that timeframe start paying attention to it. For you and us up here yoiu need that euro track maybe a hair further south or stronger to drag the colder air down increasing precip rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is in the 925-850mb layers on the models. the wind backs from the south, and thats deadly if you want a snowstorm. Also the 925 and 850mb lows, which seen below tracks overhead, you want to be north of that.

NAM_221_2012112418_F81_TMPC_925_MB.png

NAM_221_2012112418_F84_TMPC_850_MB.png

agreed

but that one map is for 81 hrs and at 84 hrs there is still precip overhead in central MD

no doubt, as currently modeled, the big cities won't see accum snow, but there's plenty of time if we can take another couple of steps in the right direction, which is where I'm going....especially considering the 5H low placement

maybe the lower levels will be adjusted as time goes on (or some other weenie magic!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed

but that map is for 81 hrs and at 84 hrs there is still precip overhead in central MD

no doubt, as currently modeled, the big cities won't see accum snow, but there's plenty of time if we can take another couple of steps in the right direction, which is where I'm going....especially considering the 5H low placement

maybe the lower levels will be adjusted as time goes on (or some other weenie magic!)

Yea, like i said to Ian, i wouldnt give the nam consideration until inside 48hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we get a decent track etc I would bet this event ends up colder than forecast. Prime season for that once you get precip going. air mass isnt super by any means but there's cold enough air around with reinforcements coming in with the storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol i was just illustrating a point. All the models are showing the southerly wind carnage to some degree or other.

yeah it's an uphill battle particularly without elevation but that's standard early season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see, the pattern gets a better after day 12. Dec 5-10 typically brings a first winter threat. I would never call for something big in DCA at that range.

Not sure the pattern is going to be better. Yeah the AO is going pretty strongly negative per most models, But that big ass ridge west of Alaska isnt budging. That means cold for parts of AK and western Canada and maybe Pac NW at times, but the PNA is negative which means downstream ridging and generally mild over central/eastern US. And the NAO doesnt look to be persistently negative. See the latest CFS monthly temp anomalies for Dec. Looks quite toasty. Need that ridge to retrograde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure the pattern is going to be better. Yeah the AO is going pretty strongly negative per most models, But that big ass ridge west of Alaska isnt budging. That means cold for parts of AK and western Canada and maybe Pac NW at times, but the PNA is negative which means downstream ridging and generally mild over central/eastern US. And the NAO doesnt look to be persistently negative. See the latest CFS monthly temp anomalies for Dec. Looks quite toasty. Need that ridge to retrograde.

we may see a -EPO/+PNA/-NAO pattern develop after the 5th....probably would be transient, but we could maybe eek out a mixy event then....LC may be on to something...too far out now, but I'd say 60-40 we average -departures in the 12/7-12/12 range..December will start out warm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we may see a -EPO/+PNA/-NAO pattern develop after the 5th....probably would be transient, but we could maybe eek out a mixy event then....LC may be on to something...too far out now, but I'd say 60-40 we average -departures in the 12/7-12/12 range..December will start out warm

Matt,

I think that is too early to get the positive PNA. To me the pattern looks warmer than normal with a crappy PNA through the 9th.

The CPC superensemble has a strongly negative ao but has a really crappy look to it. one that lets lots of warm air flood the conus as lots of pac air crashes into coast.

post-70-0-73989200-1353859814_thumb.gif

I composited the analog dates to make sure their 500h looked similar to the center mean. They did, then I looked at the temp anomalies for date of the centered mean from the anomalies and got this warm look. Based on the 500h anomaly pattern, I think this temp anomaly look is reasonable for that dec 5th or 6th.

post-70-0-46762000-1353859985_thumb.gif

I then composited the 500h for 3 days beyond the centered man and got this composite which still holds onto the neg pna and positive heights across the east despite the neg ao look.

post-70-0-27195800-1353860114_thumb.gif

That;s still a warm look overall for us. My guess is that the temps for the dec 4-9 period will be warmer than normal and that any snow chances will have to wait. That said, I'm relying on a mean model pattern and have little skill past day 4 or 5 so I could be totally wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt,

I think that is too early to get the positive PNA. To me the pattern looks warmer than normal with a crappy PNA through the 9th.

The CPC superensemble has a strongly negative ao but has a really crappy look to it. one that lets lots of warm air flood the conus as lots of pac air crashes into coast.

post-70-0-73989200-1353859814_thumb.gif

I composited the analog dates to make sure their 500h looked similar to the center mean. They did, then I looked at the temp anomalies for date of the centered mean from the anomalies and got this warm look. Based on the 500h anomaly pattern, I think this temp anomaly look is reasonable for that dec 5th or 6th.

post-70-0-46762000-1353859985_thumb.gif

I then composited the 500h for 3 days beyond the centered man and got this composite which still holds onto the neg pna and positive heights across the east despite the neg ao look.

post-70-0-27195800-1353860114_thumb.gif

That;s still a warm look overall for us. My guess is that the temps for the dec 4-9 period will be warmer than normal and that any snow chances will have to wait. That said, I'm relying on a mean model pattern and have little skill past day 4 or 5 so I could be totally wrong.

thanks for the info...maybe we have to wait until a few days later if it even happens?...I though there were some indications a decent pattern might pop up the 8th or 9th but maybe not...I don't mind punting the 1st 10 days of december when climo is bad if we get a better one the 2nd half...I never thought much of December this winter...others went cold....I like where I stand as far as the outlook

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...