Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,517
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    gopenoxfox
    Newest Member
    gopenoxfox
    Joined

2/29 - 3/1


NEG NAO

Recommended Posts

The Hi-Res models initialized at 12z today which is 7 am this morning.

That means to accurately compare the radars on the Hi Res Models to the actual radar, you would need to compare hour 14 of the Hi-Res models to the radar.

Take a look.

They seem slower with the precipitation than what is occuring right now.

They don't have the precipitation into eastern IL.

Compare:

rad14.gif

http://radar.weather...entgrtlakes.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 883
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is WAY outside the HRRR range right now.

Not way out of the range, but I'm basing that on the fact that

1) The P Type is already starting in the Poconos in the coldest locations as a brief icy mix. (ZR).

2) With a SE/E wind progged to occur, that would quickly eliminate all low level cold in a matter of a couple of hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what mt holly said about the models on fb

Lots of up and downs in the model verification over the upper midwest, the wrf looks better at 850mb where its warmer, the gfs looks better at 925mb where in general its colder than forecast. gfs precipitation field looks best with its 6 hr qpf verification. Both model crude snowfall estimates for the last 6 hrs around Minneapolis were too southeast. The wrf-nmm is the coldest of the six models. no denying they all are suggesting a front end heavy start, or in general a 3 to 6 hour precip burst event, but even the wrf-nmm has warm air arriving at 6-7K about an hour or two after precipitation is suppose to start there. Its also saturated at that level before the precipitation starts, so dynamic cooling has to compensate for the warm air advection (60 knots of wind at that level). Even raising the Morristown bufkit sounding to 1000 feet, only gives us 1.1" of snow as a Morris County estimate, if anything that sounding configuration would support more sleet than snow. We can see how the snowfall orientation with this one may verify more nw to se than the traditional sw to ne because of the position of the high in Quebec. We'll have tonight's model run to see if any adjustments have to be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a really solid event for I-90 from ALB to BOS. Could be a foot or more along much of this corridor. In Boston it'll be tougher but if these spokes of energy and coastal low can spawn some good enough banding, they could do very well too. The upper Catskills through the Adirondacks will also get slammed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW the 23z HRRR was VERY VERY warm for this storm, with the 0C 850 mb temperatures being a good 10-20 miles NE of NYC when precipitation hasn't even started yet.

temp_t3850_f15.png

It's the HRRR at hour 15 - even 6-10 hours out it still couldn't figure out where the axis of heavier accumulation would be with the last storm. While a warmer outcome than modeled is perhaps possible, with the 0z NAM also warmer than its previous run, but I'd rather wait until the HRRR gets closer to the actual time frame before taking it more seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With clear to partly cloudy skies, calm winds and 20 degree dps, what did you expect? 100 meters over your head the temp is probably around 37F and that won't fall as quickly regardless of how well the surface radiates.

Edit...this for those who are noting surface temps near freezing.

Cooling nicely over here in northport 34.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With clear to partly cloudy skies, calm winds and 20 degree dps, what did you expect? 100 meters over your head the temp is probably around 37F and that won't fall as quickly regardless of how well the surface radiates.

Edit...this for those who are noting surface temps near freezing.

It's the classic weenie comment, "surface temps are colder than progged, OMG!!". Just ignore the strong primary cutting through the Lakes, torching the mid levels, and everything else that blows about this synoptic pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the classic weenie comment, "surface temps are colder than progged, OMG!!". Just ignore the strong primary cutting through the Lakes, torching the mid levels, and everything else that blows about this synoptic pattern.

Or the SE winds that will develop in the AM....

-

OT-nice moon set in the Western sky right now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...