All Activity

Kind of funny reading these posts, arguing over a few degrees.

It is very obvious what Hoff is saying is accurate. If you don’t think our “base state” has warmed you’re in denial…and that has clearly been evident in battleground events and toss up outcomes. We’ve started to see lowland climo creep further and further n/w beyond just the fall line. The outcomes recently where our n&w areas haven’t won are bad luck, but the rest is all rooted in fact. also, stormy is one of the biggest shitposters in the history of AmericanWx, I wouldn’t even bother with that nonsense.

Danbury airport north of 84 , partly cloudy midday and a high of 42.

You need to get checked out, do you lack any reading comprehension? it’s not up for debate , it’s documented online and I said partly cloudy at the airports!

Yeah, it was a widespread massive Miller A. I think around here it was probably more like 2 Feet. The Paper actually said 2 to 5 feet County Totals with up to 10 Feet Drifts. lol. So, apparently we were Jack potted that Time but just don't know to the extent of what was reported..My Parents were kids then and said they built Tunnels in it and it was up to the Window of their House and many jad to get up and clean porches off as were afraid of collapse. There's a Picture taken in Norton of the '42 Storm and it was probably 35-40" on the Level. If I find it I'll post it. Asheville recorded 16" from it. Pittsburgh over 2 Feet. March 60 had to be something to behold.

That GFS run can GFI

All I can say is not one inland site was 40’s and sunny . Not one . Mid- upper 30’s sure. Backed up by posters here . Carry on with agendas

Thats because actual real time atmospheric conditions are not being included in to these models. Everything is playing catchup rn. We snow!!

First, how do you think plants work? They rely on CO2! Let’s drop the CO2 levels by that same 0.0002, which is 50% of that 0.0004. That seemingly insignificant drop would diminish growth rates by up to 30% for plants who photosynthesize using C3 photosynthesis! Imagine how the biosphere would react to that! So I just disproved your point—that seemingly “small” fluctuation in CO2 levels makes a huge difference! Secondly, to answer your question about the “correct”, baseline temperature of Earth. It’s 14C. Here’s why: You are correct to point out that there are normal fluctuations in global temperature, and even without global warming, we just exited out of the Little Ice Age (1300-1700). At its peak global temperatures were around 13.5C. “Ice Age” may sound like a big cooldown to you, but really these fluctuations were only around 1C from peak ice age to peak “warm” age, and are smooth changes rather than abrupt. I will leave you with this. How does it make sense for the Earth to suddenly warm 1.5C in 100 years (more than the average difference between an ice age and “warm age) and call it natural? WxUSAF, forgive me, this will be my last post. Just needed to get this off my chest.

The actual progression in real time is looking much better for us down stream then what the models are showing rn. Also alot of moisture pretty far north on radar. The suppression doesn't look as bad either since its moving out the way.

NE CT (esp at elevation) is def different than the valley and SW CT. As much as we rib Kevin sometimes, his climate is way closer to ORH than HFD/BDL or anywhere southwest of there. But once the summer starts, he will use BDL again.

Funny how 1000' elevation tends to be colder than surrounding areas...

There is still a wave around the 24 and it’s close. It’s a little north on most guidance but given season trends don’t mind that

The 18Z RGEM just showed the most snow it has showed this week. Much more likely that it's catching up to this being a minor event than "leading the way" in any way.

The snow would have been good. But the models lost it somehow.

Shit.... Yes!! Lol

I’m sorry did you forget the substantive part of this post? Oh wait it’s YOU. Silly me. Carry on.

Someone should analyze the variance we're seeing run to run across each model. It's rare to see it this high with models going both up and down like rollercoasters - just look at the 12Z/18Z RAP and NAM. It kind of reflects who exquisitely sensitive this setup is to fairly minor variations. This might be where an NBM is the way to go - if I had to make a forecast map it would look a lot like the NBM with 1-2" for most and maybe some spots up to 3".

Plenty of 37-41s in northern CT too. Looks like your area of NE CT was the exception rather than the rule.

Are you really serious???????????????????????????????????

Overrunning events

Do you mean Patti LaBelle?

I’m one of the furthest SW posters so it made plenty of sense for my area and points southwest, the rest of NE I get it . Again was only hoping for 1-2”.

Whatever happens tomorrow night, enjoy it, LR looking kind of toasted at the moment. Alaskan pig

I told my wife that the Daytona 500 is this weekend and she said who cares (I don't watch a lot of nascar). It always meant the start of a march to spring. I leave work in the day light, tree wells get larger, snow does not last long on the roads and we can all start to worry/worship the sun angle... It was cloudy most of the day. 36 for a high. now 32.