All Activity
- Past hour
-
Fireworks Heat Contest W 7/1 - S 7/4 for Five MA Airports
nw baltimore wx replied to nw baltimore wx's topic in Mid Atlantic
The high temps used for Friday, 7/3, are: DCA 102, BWI 102, IAD 98, SBY 101, and RIC 99. I'd appreciate anyone checking that I am accurate, and if so, these are the current standings. -
They were moving east to west earlier then started moving S to N. My current forecast is dry tomorrow but you guys may have a better shot at storms.
- 321 replies
-
- severe
- mountain snow
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I was actually at Turkey Creek in a movie and it thundered there and had rained when I came out. East of there was drier and I got back here as the storm was hitting hard. It moved S to N.
- 321 replies
-
- severe
- mountain snow
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
- Today
-
The amount of rain, thunder and cloud to ground lightning earlier tonight was absolutely wonderful
-
SPC has an ENH 45% for wind over parts of the region. While DCAPE is good, overall tstm coverage does not suggest widespread high winds. And deep layer wind shear is weak so you will not likely have organized short bow or line segments moving rapidly in one direction. This does not mean any wind event will not be significant or very damaging locally, but you do not need ENH for that. You do not need even SLGT, as low svr probs say nothing about the intensity of any given individual svr event in the outlook area. 30% for wind objectively seems better. The ENH and 45% area almost bisects much of Chesapeake Bay. I have to think due to it being the 4th of July, DC, and 250 events, the ENH is due to this. I have no proof of course, but let's honest w/ ourselves. I have pointed out before there is an odd bulls-eye for frequency of svr tstm watch center over the DC area. That's is not likely due to climo. The social/economic/political do influence alerts/watches/warnings at times. .
- 909 replies
-
- severe
- thunderstorms
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
Day 1 Convective Outlook NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 0100 AM CDT Sat Jul 04 2026 Valid 041200Z - 051200Z ...THERE IS AN ENHANCED RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS PORTIONS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC... ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS ACROSS PORTIONS OF THE CENTRAL/SOUTHERN PLAINS... ...SUMMARY... Clusters of storms will move across parts of the Allegheny Plateau into Mid Atlantic, with potential for widespread damaging wind. Additional thunderstorms are expected across the Great Plains Saturday afternoon and evening, posing a risk for damaging wind gusts. Large hail is also possible across the Great Plains. ...Synopsis... Height rises will continue across the western US, with more zonal flow across the central US and upper-level troughing across the Northeast and Quebec/Ontario. A modest belt of westerly flow around 30-40 kts will move through the trough in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic. A compact shortwave trough with enhanced westerly flow will move through the flow across the Central Plains. ...Eastern Ohio Valley into the Mid-Atlantic... Activity will likely be ongoing across some portion of northern PA into northern NJ this morning. This will likely contribute to lingering cloud cover and more muted daytime heating/recovery with northern extent. South of the morning precipitation, strong daytime heating and warming is expected, with temperatures climbing into the 90s to 100s F. A plume of steep mid-level lapse rates is already in place across the region from WV into VA/MD/NJ. With daytime heating, low-level lapse rates are expected to increase with moderate to strong instability by the afternoon. Deep layer shear profiles will be generally weak, with better shear to the north. Nonetheless, several thunderstorm clusters are expected to develop across the Blue Ridge Mountains/Shenandoah Valley moving north and eastward though the afternoon. These will have the potential to produce widespread damaging wind, especially if clusters can grow upscale and develop strong cold pools. Additional clusters are likely in the wake of morning convection further north. Instability will be less, but sufficient deep layer shear may support one or more clusters capable of damaging wind.
- 909 replies
-
- severe
- thunderstorms
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
88/74/96 at 3am at DCA... toasty
-
Bit of a surprise... ENH and 45 wind up on early morning Day 1
- 909 replies
-
- severe
- thunderstorms
-
(and 7 more)
Tagged with:
-
Same with sweetwater. Pretty intense lighting too. Havent had a storm like that in a long while. It’ll be interesting to see how storms setup tomorrow with the Hight setting more in Kentucky. .
- 321 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- severe
- mountain snow
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
DCA officially had an 87/80 on the 1am ob for a heat index of 103F. Come on man.
-
E PA/NJ/DE Summer 2026 Obs/Discussion
Albedoman replied to PhiEaglesfan712's topic in Philadelphia Region
https://www.mcall.com/2026/07/03/lehigh-valley-storm-damage-photos-july-3-2026/ -
If we only have recon in these monsters. I will tell you given what recons measured from the 1940s to 1987 in the WPAC, if it was done today w/ the much more advanced tech such as GPS dropsondes and the SFMR, you want to talk records and extreme that would put all to shame what we have seen in recons in the ATLC? The few research mission recons we have had over the years in the WPAC have shown incredible stuff. Satellite estimates can only do so much. Dvorak estimates work best for TCs between 60 and 105 kt. This means two things - 1) many TDs are actually weak TSs, and 2) most very intense TCs are underestimated. The inner core of these things are strange beasts, acting more mesoscale than anything when you get to Cat 5 levels. EPAC Patricia in 2015 would have been capped at 160 kt from satellite estimate only, but recon actually found 185 kt winds. As a result of the above, TC intensities and annual ACE globally are underestimated, and the further you go back, esp. prior to the satellite era, the more off it is. And really w/ recon, we only started to see things in proper detail w/ the advent of the GPS dropsonde in the late 1990s and the SFMR in 2004. So you can't really use the database we have over the long-term for true TC trends.
-
E PA/NJ/DE Summer 2026 Obs/Discussion
Albedoman replied to PhiEaglesfan712's topic in Philadelphia Region
Yep my area was the hardest hit from the these storms this evening- from 102 temps down to the mid 70's comes with derecho type straightline winds like I said earlier this week could happen. Only .31 in of rain but the winds were bad. Spent an hour picking up dead limbs/branches in the yard and street. this happened less than 1 mile from the house---- Severe thunderstorms moved through the Lehigh Valley on Friday evening, temporarily dropping temperatures amid the extreme heat, but also causing significant tree damage that cut power to thousands of area residents just as Fourth of July celebrations get started. Some of the worst storm damage was reported in the Alburtis and Macungie areas, where numerous downed trees dotted the landscape. Alburtis declared a “state of emergency” due to the damage. “Please avoid unnecessary travel, stay clear of downed trees and power lines, and follow all guidance from emergency personnel,” according to a post on the borough’s Facebook page around 9:30 p.m. “Updates will be provided as crews continue assessment and restoration efforts.” One tree fell onto a house on West Fifth Street in the borough, tearing away part of the roof. A freight train was also stopped in the borough due to a large tree that fell on the tracks, blocking both railroad crossings on North Main Street and West Penn Avenue. As of 8 p.m., PPL’s outage map reported nearly 12,000 customers without power in Lehigh and Northampton counties. Areas reporting more than 1,000 outages included Washington Township, Upper Milford Township, South Whitehall Township and Lower Macungie Township in Lehigh County, as well as Northampton borough and -
E PA/NJ/DE Summer 2026 Obs/Discussion
LVblizzard replied to PhiEaglesfan712's topic in Philadelphia Region
Power outage map looks pretty crazy. It looks like literally everyone in East Greenville, Pennsburg, and Red Hill - and the surrounding 5-10 miles - are without power. -
Not sure if it will intensify much after passing the Marianas. It already had its first absolute peak on Fri, and now has leveled off at 140 kt. The eye is currently 30 nm in diameter which is quite large for such a low latitude and so early that far E in this tropical basin. Just saying that if you want a weenie super-duper intense TC, you want to see a pinhole eye, and Bavi never had that, and once the eye gets large, it does not go back the other way. Since the Bavi will slowly gain latitude and undergo ERCs, the eye should only increase in size. Might become an annular TC in fact (the "truck tire" look!). Annular TCs can still be intense (Isabel in Sep 2003 was 140 kt and a classic annular TC), but they tend to stay steady-sate for a long period of time once getting that structure. Ineedsnow will have live Guam radar up 100% of the time for the next several days?
-
One thing that is apparent, when you look at deep at historical data and wx events of the past, you find many that match or exceed anything today or in recent years. But history be damned in favor of the narrative. A friend of mine who gets the small wx calendars that you remove a page a day, he notes obvious bias as to historical wx events. He has told me it is like nothing ever happened/existed before 2000. All it talks about is extremes in recent years. So when I say "narrative," I am not pulling things out of thin air. You can see clear bias and skewed facts all over the place w/ disingenuous motives. All I am saying is that *all* data/info be reported on or put forth, esp. in the sciences, since it is objective and based on fact. Then individuals can at least make educated and reasonable points/views/opinions.
-
Just got a rumble of thunder out of nowhere
-
So BDL unperformed overall. GFS MOS had 103 Thu/Fri 18z 7/1 and 00z 7/2 runs and still just after was showing 101/102. Yet "only" 100 and 98 the 2 days. Wasn't due to convection or clouds. Any long-term MOS bias for BDL? I think the only reason why BOS hit 100 Fri was due to NW subsidence and the DP dropping to 57. What the MSM and others don't tell you or report is that once the dew point drops to 57 or lower, that heat index is actually *lower* than the air temp. BOS 100/57 at 3pm gave a heat index of 99.
