Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,013
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

2026-2027 Record-breaking El Nino


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Winter Wizard said:

I'm not sure what, if any implications, this will have going forward or exactly what the root cause is but it's pretty clear August 2026 behaved much differently than other Super Nino cases (1982, 1997, 2015) and was essentially a hotter version of 2023. I don't think there was anyone in the industry who predicted anything close to a recor 

2026.png?496623

 

2023.png?496623

 

2015.png?496623

 

1997.png?496623

 

1982.png?496623

 

Right away, you could probably attribute it, at least in part, to much higher national drought coverage than we've seen in other Nino cases since 2000.image.png.64a6ca13001e0969f57a1c9341a382a0.png

 

 

The drought is just a natural cyclical feed back response to the excessively rainy years we have had since 2002. Consider the el nino summers of 1991, 1994 and 2002 to see summer heat during a developing el nino. We are now cycling back to that drier era and after this el Nino is over that will only increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LakePaste25 said:

Will need to keep an eye out for a N Pac low as we get into September. 

History says ~Sept 25-30 is the time when it should start to develop, then all the time that follows.

Correlation is weakest in Sept, then 2nd weakest in July. Actually June-Sept is like -0.15 H5 correlation max in the NPH region. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

15-16 had a monster N. Pacific trough

DDp-Yk-URje.png

That 14-16 was a +PDO spike really gives some weight to the pdo correlation numbers. 

I don't mean the North Pacific pattern per se...I didn't even use 2015 as an extra tropical Pacific analog. I mean that I expect the degree of MC influence to be similar to 2015. The PDO will be much lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LakePaste25 said:

OLR is solidly El Niño. Deepest convective anomalies are forecasted to be around 150-160W. Will need to keep an eye out for a N Pac low as we get into September. 

 

IMG_0811.png

New OLR record for so early in an El Niño as this becomes the strongest east based event for the date.


In recent days, the warming has intensified off the coast of #Ecuador and northern #Perú. It is there that

measures and assesses #ElNiñoCostero. From an atmospheric and oceanic perspective, OLR values are at historic lows for this time of year in the central and eastern Pacific. This is evidence of coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere. The depth of the warm waters to the west of #Galapagos (the last point where we can compare all events), the volume of warm water clearly exceeds that of 1997, while those of 2015 and 2023 were much smaller. This sheds light on the robustness of the event in the eastern Pacific.

IMG_7477.thumb.png.d00d0557a1ba01f0fbda039039f5b979.png
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, bluewave said:

New OLR record for so early in an El Niño as this becomes the strongest east based event for the date.


In recent days, the warming has intensified off the coast of #Ecuador and northern #Perú. It is there that

measures and assesses #ElNiñoCostero. From an atmospheric and oceanic perspective, OLR values are at historic lows for this time of year in the central and eastern Pacific. This is evidence of coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere. The depth of the warm waters to the west of #Galapagos (the last point where we can compare all events), the volume of warm water clearly exceeds that of 1997, while those of 2015 and 2023 were much smaller. This sheds light on the robustness of the event in the eastern Pacific.

IMG_7477.thumb.png.d00d0557a1ba01f0fbda039039f5b979.png
 

 

 I like to remind folks when I read x-posts like this this from Brody Cowing that ignore using RONI types of measures that some of this intensity of warming in the Nino regions is due to GW and not purely due to the strength of the Nino, itself.

 When using relative/RONI records put out by NOAA, it’s clear that Nino 1+2 isn’t currently at record highs:

20AUG1997         3.8        2.6        1.8        0.4


19AUG2026         3.2        2.5        1.8        0.0

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 I like to remind folks when I read x-posts like this this from Brody Cowing that ignore using RONI types of measures that some of this intensity of warming in the Nino regions is due to GW and not purely due to the strength of the Nino, itself.

 When using RONI records put out by NOAA, it’s clear that Nino 1+2 isn’t currently at record highs:

20AUG1997         3.8        2.6        1.8        0.4


19AUG2026         3.2        2.5        1.8        0.0

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt

RONI is a relative metric to other areas of SST warmth. It’s not a realistic gauge of how strong the actual El Niño event is. The planet doesn’t care about relative metrics as the global temperatures are setting records every day now with how extreme this event is becoming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bluewave said:

RONI is a relative metric to other areas of SST warmth. It’s not a realistic gauge of how strong the actual El Niño event is. Kind of like relative humidity where the dewpoint is a more accurate measure of the moisture content in the atmosphere.

 Chris, are you disputing NOAA? NOAA is saying as I think you must realize that measuring against average overall worldwide tropical ocean warming is a more realistic gauge of the strength of ENSO events. Why else did they convert to relative measures for official measurements? Also, BoM has switched among other organizations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 Chris, are you disputing NOAA? NOAA is saying as I think you must realize that measuring against average overall worldwide tropical ocean warming is a more realistic gauge of how strong ENSO events. Why else did they convert to relative measures for official measurements? Also, BoM has switched among other organizations.

NOAA and other agencies maintain both the ONI and RONI. The paper it’s based on developed it more for marginal events like weak La Ninas and El Niños where the WPAC warm pool was extending more influence than the Nina regions. This was not specifically designed for higher end El Niños or La Ninas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...