Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 14 hours ago Author Share Posted 14 hours ago Precip this July-Aug has been very similar to the 2017-2025 composite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 6 hours ago, Winter Wizard said: I'm not sure what, if any implications, this will have going forward or exactly what the root cause is but it's pretty clear August 2026 behaved much differently than other Super Nino cases (1982, 1997, 2015) and was essentially a hotter version of 2023. I don't think there was anyone in the industry who predicted anything close to a recor Right away, you could probably attribute it, at least in part, to much higher national drought coverage than we've seen in other Nino cases since 2000. The drought is just a natural cyclical feed back response to the excessively rainy years we have had since 2002. Consider the el nino summers of 1991, 1994 and 2002 to see summer heat during a developing el nino. We are now cycling back to that drier era and after this el Nino is over that will only increase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LakePaste25 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago OLR is solidly El Niño. Deepest convective anomalies are forecasted to be around 150-160W. Will need to keep an eye out for a N Pac low as we get into September. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 12 hours ago Author Share Posted 12 hours ago 9 minutes ago, LakePaste25 said: Will need to keep an eye out for a N Pac low as we get into September. History says ~Sept 25-30 is the time when it should start to develop, then all the time that follows. Correlation is weakest in Sept, then 2nd weakest in July. Actually June-Sept is like -0.15 H5 correlation max in the NPH region. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 7 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: 15-16 had a monster N. Pacific trough That 14-16 was a +PDO spike really gives some weight to the pdo correlation numbers. I don't mean the North Pacific pattern per se...I didn't even use 2015 as an extra tropical Pacific analog. I mean that I expect the degree of MC influence to be similar to 2015. The PDO will be much lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted 59 minutes ago Share Posted 59 minutes ago 11 hours ago, LakePaste25 said: OLR is solidly El Niño. Deepest convective anomalies are forecasted to be around 150-160W. Will need to keep an eye out for a N Pac low as we get into September. New OLR record for so early in an El Niño as this becomes the strongest east based event for the date. In recent days, the warming has intensified off the coast of #Ecuador and northern #Perú. It is there that @enfenperu measures and assesses #ElNiñoCostero. From an atmospheric and oceanic perspective, OLR values are at historic lows for this time of year in the central and eastern Pacific. This is evidence of coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere. The depth of the warm waters to the west of #Galapagos (the last point where we can compare all events), the volume of warm water clearly exceeds that of 1997, while those of 2015 and 2023 were much smaller. This sheds light on the robustness of the event in the eastern Pacific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 22 minutes ago Share Posted 22 minutes ago 57 minutes ago, bluewave said: New OLR record for so early in an El Niño as this becomes the strongest east based event for the date. In recent days, the warming has intensified off the coast of #Ecuador and northern #Perú. It is there that @enfenperu measures and assesses #ElNiñoCostero. From an atmospheric and oceanic perspective, OLR values are at historic lows for this time of year in the central and eastern Pacific. This is evidence of coupling between the ocean and the atmosphere. The depth of the warm waters to the west of #Galapagos (the last point where we can compare all events), the volume of warm water clearly exceeds that of 1997, while those of 2015 and 2023 were much smaller. This sheds light on the robustness of the event in the eastern Pacific. I like to remind folks when I read x-posts like this this from Brody Cowing that ignore using RONI types of measures that some of this intensity of warming in the Nino regions is due to GW and not purely due to the strength of the Nino, itself. When using relative/RONI records put out by NOAA, it’s clear that Nino 1+2 isn’t currently at record highs: 20AUG1997 3.8 2.6 1.8 0.4 19AUG2026 3.2 2.5 1.8 0.0 https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted 15 minutes ago Share Posted 15 minutes ago 12 minutes ago, GaWx said: I like to remind folks when I read x-posts like this this from Brody Cowing that ignore using RONI types of measures that some of this intensity of warming in the Nino regions is due to GW and not purely due to the strength of the Nino, itself. When using RONI records put out by NOAA, it’s clear that Nino 1+2 isn’t currently at record highs: 20AUG1997 3.8 2.6 1.8 0.4 19AUG2026 3.2 2.5 1.8 0.0 https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt RONI is a relative metric to other areas of SST warmth. It’s not a realistic gauge of how strong the actual El Niño event is. The planet doesn’t care about relative metrics as the global temperatures are setting records every day now with how extreme this event is becoming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 6 minutes ago Share Posted 6 minutes ago 10 minutes ago, bluewave said: RONI is a relative metric to other areas of SST warmth. It’s not a realistic gauge of how strong the actual El Niño event is. Kind of like relative humidity where the dewpoint is a more accurate measure of the moisture content in the atmosphere. Chris, are you disputing NOAA? NOAA is saying as I think you must realize that measuring against average overall worldwide tropical ocean warming is a more realistic gauge of the strength of ENSO events. Why else did they convert to relative measures for official measurements? Also, BoM has switched among other organizations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted 1 minute ago Share Posted 1 minute ago 4 minutes ago, GaWx said: Chris, are you disputing NOAA? NOAA is saying as I think you must realize that measuring against average overall worldwide tropical ocean warming is a more realistic gauge of how strong ENSO events. Why else did they convert to relative measures for official measurements? Also, BoM has switched among other organizations. NOAA and other agencies maintain both the ONI and RONI. The paper it’s based on developed it more for marginal events like weak La Ninas and El Niños where the WPAC warm pool was extending more influence than the Nina regions. This was not specifically designed for higher end El Niños or La Ninas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now