Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,689
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

The Jan 31 Potential: Stormtracker Failure or 'Tracker Trouncing


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ravensrule said:

Please ignore the prepubescents.  

I do get irritated because yeah I fuck up sometimes and I don't mind getting trolled or laughed at if it's a legit fuck up.  But I was right.  I know people want a storm, but don't get mad at me. :ph34r:  If I programmed the Euro, we'd be getting a Nova Scotia style blizzard.  

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alfoman said:

Trying to figure out why the Euro ended up with that surface translation even with more west ticks at 500: 

Looks like we just end up more positively tilted for longer (you can see the difference below at hr 87) and there is slightly worse spacing with the kicker out west. This one is going to drive us crazy with small shifts like that making the difference in the end. 

image.thumb.png.a98df3fb6cd0ae1ff9596d71007d6a42.png

It’s a bit confusing too. Kicker is somewhat there, but not enough in my eyes to usher things out to sea that way given the h5 leading in. It’s indeed more positive and slightly less sharp on those frames. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

I do get irritated because yeah I fuck up sometimes and I don't mind getting trolled or laughed at if it's a legit fuck up.  But I was right.  I know people want a storm, but don't get mad at me. :ph34r:  If I programmed the Euro, we'd be getting a Nova Scotia style blizzard.  

I for one appreciate your work and insight. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Thomas:

New 0z European kinda held steady with what the 18z Euro was showing. I wouldn’t say it made any significant jog west from the 18z but it’s west of its last 6z and 12z runs. QPF (green shading) is heavily blown in on its eastern flank due to midlevel winds but the surface low itself very similar to the 18z. So I wouldn’t worry about that QPF at the moment. But interesting to see that it held!

I’ll monitor the ensembles and get them out shortly when they roll in. We’ll see how the members did.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buddy1987 said:

Crazy to me it’s 2026 and within a 60-84 hr window I could be looking at 2 feet or 2 inches. I really wish we would invest some serious coin into the models.

Models are miles better than they were 25 years ago. But that doesn't mean they're at the point where chaos like this doesn't happen. I'm sure in time the technology will continue to grow and improve...it simply isn't there yet. I've kinda learned to accept the limitations (somewhat at least, lol) and appreciate the progress.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Takeaways for the 0z runs are that that the globals are still shifting with the northern stream and fairly large disagreements remain. Accentuated by the fact the evolution is very sensitive. Convective feedback / parameterization issues starting to show with the rapid deepening. We wait.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Takeaways for the 0z runs are that that the globals are still shifting with the northern stream and fairly large disagreements remain. Convective feedback / parameterization issues starting to show with the rapid deepening. We wait.

Euro turned negative too late for all 21678fc496ceaaf461a2a612b68369db.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Takeaways for the 0z runs are that that the globals are still shifting with the northern stream and fairly large disagreements remain. Convective feedback / parameterization issues starting to show with the rapid deepening. We wait.

Euro turned negative too late for all 21678fc496ceaaf461a2a612b68369db.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting to lose confidence of major snow for the metros. Yeah maybe a decent event for NC, DelMarva and Cape Cod. 

 

DC, Baltimore,Philly and NYC metros are probably getting the finger. The solution from Sunday night that had 2 feet in Harrisburg and 4 feet in Garrett County is definitely not coming back.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s just a lot of mix signaling. Every midlands come west with the lobe. CMC was kinda ridiculous. So there’s a clear trend westward up top. Maybe this time the euro is the outlier and the GFS leads the way.  Guess we’ll end the standoff by tomm. NAM is out of range but the fact that it backed up the gfs keeps me interested. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

It’s just a lot of mix signaling. Every midlands come west with the lobe. CMC was kinda ridiculous. So there’s a clear trend westward up top. Maybe this time the euro is the outlier and the GFS leads the way.  Guess we’ll end the standoff by tomm. NAM is out of range but the fact that it backed up the gfs keeps me interested. 

Good update, perhaps people should stop stepping on the pbp, it would be helpful.

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

It’s just a lot of mix signaling. Every midlands come west with the lobe. CMC was kinda ridiculous. So there’s a clear trend westward up top. Maybe this time the euro is the outlier and the GFS leads the way.  Guess we’ll end the standoff by tomm. NAM is out of range but the fact that it backed up the gfs keeps me interested. 

The Euro certainly feels more inconsistent than usual...keeps going back and forth as opposed to being either completely stubborn or making small ticks in one direction. And that despite improvements at H5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...