February 2026 Medium/ Long Range Discussion: 150K Salary Needed to Post

[CAPE]

43 minutes ago, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

Also two days in a row waking up to @CAPE calling people’s analysis lazy lol. 

Unlike yesterday, that wasn't really directed at anyone, just a general statement. I was actually replying to my own post lol.

[Ji]

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

looks like a mix of 1966, 1978, 1993 and 2003

someone gave JB access to the google model making feature

[anotherman]

looks like a mix of 1966, 1978, 1993 and 2003

JB created it in a lab. Frankenhecs

[Ji]

9 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

looks like a mix of 1966, 1978, 1993 and 2003

so much changed. the lead wave was suppose to cut under the block. but this look now is completely different

[WxUSAF]

20 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

looks like a mix of 1966, 1978, 1993 and 2003

Except with warm rain?

[CAPE]

9 minutes ago, Ji said:

so much changed. the lead wave was suppose to cut under the block. but this look now is completely different

You know how this works. As we get closer, errors in previous simulated outcomes get incrementally corrected until we arrive at the actual outcome, which is yet to be determined.

[psuhoffman]

44 minutes ago, Ji said:

so much changed. the lead wave was suppose to cut under the block. but this look now is completely different

The blocking trended better but the wave leaves too much energy behind and the EPS washes it out on most members as the weaker wave that ejects gets shredded by the flow. We need a stronger wave with that look