Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,017
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Extreme Cold, Snow & Sleet: SECS 1/24 - 1/26


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Astoriaweather said:

Besides the thermals, I guess I also worry that the storm ends up moving past us even faster than models suggest it will.  It seems that often ends up happening, unless its a prolonged overrunning or crawling coastal.   There have been plenty of times where we expect storms to last 12 hours but in reality they pass by in about 8 to 10. 

This  is the type of storm that will have some unexpected surprises - now casting time..........I also wouldn't be surprised if there is an unexpected large dry slot that develops because of a sloppy transfer of the storm to the coast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eduggs said:

God that's an ugly sounding for NYC. I wonder if the warm layer being between 700mb and 850mb makes it less likely to show up on 3rd party graphics for other models... maybe other models don't generate and distribute temperature data in between the more common pressure heights.

Sounding.thumb.jpg.7f11d34dbc5f2812994f1947605e13c0.jpg

Nothing we can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Gemini (aka "ask Jeeves"):
 
In 2026, the FV3 model (specifically in its High-Resolution Window and GFS implementations) is noted for a more conservative approach to "warm noses" (elevated layers of air above freezing) compared to older models like the NAM. 
 
Warm Nose Prediction Characteristics
  • Layer Integrity: The FV3 tends to maintain colder column integrity better than the NAM. In winter weather setups, it often predicts a weaker or later-arriving warm nose, which can lead to forecasts for more persistent snow while other models might suggest an earlier transition to sleet or rain.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jm1220 said:

I take it as the worst possible outcome and the hi-res RGEM as the best because of the front end thump that still drops 10-12" despite changing most of us over. That said if sleet really makes it to I-84 those of us down here are screwed for anything major and we might struggle to make it to a warning criteria event. We're not there yet but by tonight if the NAM still totally sucks I'll take it more seriously. I didn't like the GFS cutting back at 6z either. NAM has been too aggressive with the warm layer in the past but it will probably be more right than other models close in. We should also monitor obs in the South/TN Valley for how far the warm layer is advancing vs what models have. 

My sister is in spring hill south of Nashville is snowing there already. Best real time updates possible. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amongst other things, the NWS has me at 7 to 13 inches, then ice. This forecast covers from central Delaware to NW NJ. Makes no sense, this should be broken into several different zones. They usually do that for these situations 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

I agree. I posted it, because a member mentioned that the 10:1 ratios don't reflect further north. I think it's too aggressive and too cold for the I-95 Corridor.

so what is the best mesoscale model to use this go around ? The HRRR performed well last weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lead in forecast evolution for tomorrow's storm reminds me a lot of the December 2020 across our area (differences of course especially SNE and mid-Atl). The big snows for that one slipped away too but the impact was still significant locally.

750842366_1638980282_December16-172020snowmap.jpg.76427fcbdc1079cba0c2169eb8680b9c.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

I think 6-10 is the best guess for NYC.  Nothing shows 12.

Gfs is trash

I don't see 10 tbh, maybe in the northern Bronx but this looks to be a quick heavy thump with a few hours of heavy rates. 4-8" might be a better call. The NWS also went overly aggressive, like way too aggressive so those totals will be lowered soon I'd think.

The GFS should almost always be discounted especially when it's on its own like it was in this case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...