Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,668
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    LordOfMud
    Newest Member
    LordOfMud
    Joined

Mid-Long Range Discussion 2026


BooneWX
 Share

Recommended Posts

After how much Snow I got from this storm, and having to deal with the Ice storm exactly one week ago from today. I think I’m good on winter storms for the rest of the year.
 

They’re only fun for me if you have deal with a good one once per year.

  • Disagree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We ended up with about 3-4 here just east of downtown Raleigh. This was the FIFA snow prize for sure with this one but none the less it is better than a zero out by far. This storm was our shot at a 6+ event so we will not see that this year but so it goes. I do not think it is possible to get 2 big snow events in a season in this region so my guess is from here on out we will be tracking minor and/or mixed p events. Congrats to those that did get the big totals.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BooneWX said:

Ya know who locked in early and didn’t waiver? Weathernext 2. Even called the subsidence early on. 

It was definitely the most consistent from almost a week out and nailed the general footprint.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Traditionally I have focused more on teleconnections for cold; and I am pretty ignorant about storm dynamics.  I know that Miller A/B are ideal models and most noreasters are hybrids.  Is it correct to say that the recent storm was pretty firmly in the Miller B category: a LP coming from the midwest transferring to a coastal low?

I understand the general idea of the dry slot coming from the gap between the winding down of the primary and the winding up of the secondary.  Is a dry slot an absolute in these types of storms?  Are there conditions which lead to smaller or larger dry slots?  What factors determine the location of the slot?  If the coastal low had formed closer to the coast would the dry slot have been more towards the west, or would it have merged with the precip from the primary low leading to a smaller dry slot (or no dry slot)?

I appreciate anyone who feels like taking time to share some knowledge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Traditionally I have focused more on teleconnections for cold; and I am pretty ignorant about storm dynamics.  I know that Miller A/B are ideal models and most noreasters are hybrids.  Is it correct to say that the recent storm was pretty firmly in the Miller B category: a LP coming from the midwest transferring to a coastal low?

I understand the general idea of the dry slot coming from the gap between the winding down of the primary and the winding up of the secondary.  Is a dry slot an absolute in these types of storms?  Are there conditions which lead to smaller or larger dry slots?  What factors determine the location of the slot?  If the coastal low had formed closer to the coast would the dry slot have been more towards the west, or would it have merged with the precip from the primary low leading to a smaller dry slot (or no dry slot)?

I appreciate anyone who feels like taking time to share some knowledge.

This was more of a miller A. A miller B has a surface low in the Appalachian region that transfers usually around the Virginia coastline. You had the ULL that gave most of western NC a good snow, and you then had the coastal that hit eastern NC. Storms/rain/snow are created with lift, and when you have two areas of strong lift, the area in between has the air particles sinking. This is called subsidence. This is what the “dry slot” was. It wasn’t actually dry air really, it was more of a lack of lift and thus not creating the precip needed. If the coastal had formed closer to the coast and the ULL had tilted negatively sooner and interacted more with the surface low, the precip shield from the coastal and ULL would have merged better and filled in (like it did later in the evening). Unfortunately these two did not interact as much as needed for central NC and the transfer of energy basically skipped over central NC and did not provide any lift, or vertical velocity. Feel free to ask if you have any questions or if I didn’t explain it well enough.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...