Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,365
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Patruthseaker
    Newest Member
    Patruthseaker
    Joined

First Winter Storm to kickoff 2025-26 Winter season


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I think not is their more data, but other guidance has closed the gap....so like I said, I don't think the EURO has gotten worse... but it runs more often and other guidance is better. JMO....I don't want to incur the wrath of Wolfie.

I get that other guidance has got better, But you use to be able to lock the Euro inside 84hrs, Those days are gone.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I think that not only is there more data, but other guidance has closed the gap....so like I said, I don't think the EURO has gotten worse... but it runs more often and other guidance is better. JMO....I don't want to incur the wrath of Wolfie.

Euro is prob gonna win the compromise on the track closer to the BM…we’ll see. But it def was decently too cold in thermal profiles. But it’s had that issue for a few seasons now. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

I somewhat disagree with you. I know we don't use the n:am model as often, but it is in its range now. And then the GFS has a similar look to the NAM ( just not the crazy amounts the NAM put out ). But the GFS came down more from where it was and now has Connecticut in the zone of more snow. So to me that's a big change.

Someone named snowcrazed disagrees with me. Lol.

 

The Nam is not in its range and is way to zonked with QPF. Gfs is still warm aloft. Better for Kevin but not great S and W. CT is a big state. I don’t even know where you are. I said Kevin’s area is still the highest area of uncertainty and so did Will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 512high said:

Lol almost game time and these models can't get a clue....

ineedsnow's idea sounds about right for us. Probably closer to 6 than 10. But slightly concerned about power issues with the column potentially looking like this: 2025120100_NAM_048_42.72,-71.50_winter_mu.png

4 hours ago, ineedsnow said:

Thinking 6 to 9 of heavy wet snow here.. maybe break 10 if im lucky

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The really high resolution stuff (HRDPS/3k NAM/etc) overnight keeps the CF pretty far east. like near 128 or even slightly east (further north you go the further east it gets)....that's something to watch because it's likely going to stay snow on the cold side of that....usually there is some enhanced lower level lift on the left side of that CF which will help to cool that lower 900-950mb layer a little bit...which will obviously matter if we have temps near 0C in that layer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

The really high resolution stuff (HRDPS/3k NAM/etc) overnight keeps the CF pretty far east. like near 128 or even slightly east (further north you go the further east it gets)....that's something to watch because it's likely going to stay snow on the cold side of that....usually there is some enhanced lower level lift on the left side of that CF which will help to cool that lower 900-950mb layer a little bit...which will obviously matter if we temps near 0C in that layer. 

Yeah saw that. Certainly crushes you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

The really high resolution stuff (HRDPS/3k NAM/etc) overnight keeps the CF pretty far east. like near 128 or even slightly east (further north you go the further east it gets)....that's something to watch because it's likely going to stay snow on the cold side of that....usually there is some enhanced lower level lift on the left side of that CF which will help to cool that lower 900-950mb layer a little bit...which will obviously matter if we temps near 0C in that layer. 

Either slush or the grid goes down in Holliston. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Someone named snowcrazed disagrees with me. Lol.

 

The Nam is not in its range and is way to zonked with QPF. Gfs is still warm aloft. Better for Kevin but not great S and W. CT is a big state. I don’t even know where you are. I said Kevin’s area is still the highest area of uncertainty and so did Will. 

Lol... Sorry to disappoint. 

I'm actually in Plainville which is just next to Farmington west of Hartford. All kidding aside, I thought The Nam was in range within 24 hours at the start of the storm. Not that I'm going with the NAM LOL.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

Lol... Sorry to disappoint. 

I'm actually in Plainville which is just next to Farmington west of Hartford. All kidding aside, I thought The Nam was in range within 24 hours at the start of the storm. Not that I'm going with the NAM LOL.

 

 

Hoping for at least 3-6 for us here in Avon.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Either slush or the grid goes down in Holliston. :lol: 

06z GFS had it pinned in roughly the same spot too. But this is a situation where like 10 miles could be the difference between 10" of cement and 2" of slop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The really high resolution stuff (HRDPS/3k NAM/etc) overnight keeps the CF pretty far east. like near 128 or even slightly east (further north you go the further east it gets)....that's something to watch because it's likely going to stay snow on the cold side of that....usually there is some enhanced lower level lift on the left side of that CF which will help to cool that lower 900-950mb layer a little bit...which will obviously matter if we have temps near 0C in that layer. 

I thought it would get a bit further....may shift that jack se a bit.

 
AVvXsEgex7gOoD5ND31_3PQgAtIjJ7R6RCiU1sV1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the BOX AFD:

The timing of this system (largely during the day) doesn`t bode well for snow chances in the low elevations.

I guess they're looking only at the time of day and not, like, the time of year?

  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ariof said:

From the BOX AFD:

The timing of this system (largely during the day) doesn`t bode well for snow chances in the low elevations.

I guess they're looking only at the time of day and not, like, the time of year?

December sun angle will get you every time. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...