Jump to content

June 2025 Obs/Disco


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

The gradient is so flaccid it's just local variability, sensitive to discrete warming variance in the micro meteorological analysis - most likely ..

Btw, there is a prefrontal "trough" .. sort of    I've been a little suspect of WPC's surface synopsis in the past, particularly with respect to these non-descript boundaries that occur here.  But this was their last product dissemination

image.png.2c9a76d7b24e5a6897259c087e9ee058.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

Every once in a while I get a whiff of decaying and drying up (fresh) dog poop...usually it's not very pleasant but for some reason on a day like today its kind of refreshing...just further adds to this experience. 

WTF is wrong with you?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
  • Confused 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I noticed the same thing this morning. Deep blue skies and none of that megalopolis hazy shat. 

I would guess it's somewhat unusual for this area. I suppose I could check cloud cover on other record days but I'm too lazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, dendrite said:

Yeah, I see that. Or is this North Springfield Lake site a separate site from the HADS station? The date shows today because morning data gets reported to that day. There are a few other readings above 101F, but those appear to be erroneous / not accepted. These values are for June only, BTW.

TUEaEyB.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Yeah, I see that. Or is this North Springfield Lake site a separate site from the HADS station? The date shows today because morning data gets reported to that day. There are a few other readings above 101F, but those appear to be erroneous / not accepted. These values are for June only, BTW.

TUEaEyB.png

For any date, it looks like this. Obviously, the 121F at Marlboro on 11/30/2005 is not correct. Somebody was burning up in flavor country. Lol.

The 107F reading at Vernon on 7/7/1912 sticks out like a sore thumb - is that recognized as a state record? Looks a little sus.

x1VM0vQ.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Not sure if this conforms with Plymouth ^ but here's NWS' for 10am at Logan

Jun 24, 10:00 am   93   70   47   99    W 12 10.00       30.00 30.02  

The hourly METARs are generally :51 to :54 past the hour. They’ve always been a little before the top of the hour so that the data could get disseminated and out for then. So your 10:00 ob is really just one of the 5 min interval obs that they do now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

The hourly METARs are generally :51 to :54 past the hour. They’ve always been a little before the top of the hour so that the data could get disseminated and out for then. So your 10:00 ob is really just one if the 5 min interval obs that they do now. 

yeah, I'm aware of that..  that's why I'm also specifying that it may not match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Yeah, I see that. Or is this North Springfield Lake site a separate site from the HADS station? The date shows today because morning data gets reported to that day. There are a few other readings above 101F, but those appear to be erroneous / not accepted.

TUEaEyB.png

I looked it up on a map and don’t believe it…mostly 96-98 around the area.

The only VT 100° I trusted yesterday was Addison over by Champlain. Lots of 98-99s and PBG obviously had the 101°. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IZG 97 already wow

8am: 88

9am: 91

10am: 93

 

They could legitimately be warmer than here today, our forecast high is 102. The temps/dews across NE yesterday and today match up with typical July monsoon airmasses here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I noticed the same thing this morning. Deep blue skies and none of that megalopolis hazy shat. 

In the 1990s, it used to be taken as a given that it would be "hazy, hot and humid" as though haze were just something that formed when it was hot and humid. Nowadays, with better pollution controls and deindustrialization, we get more blue skies from deep tropical airmasses. Clean, crisp, pollutant-free northwest flow from the 1990s now brings down Canadian wildfire smoke and elevated particulate matter. Somewhere along the line, the script was flipped on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...