Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Central PA Winter 2022/2023


Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, GrandmasterB said:

I’d pay for the HRRR to be right.  Gets 1” pretty far south and east.  We’ll see how accurate that is.

The 3K has been spitting out some nice eastern snow/frozen as well prior to 0Z.  0Z is a bit of a pull back.  For after the snow, the Nam is a small stream and road flash flood flood threat for the MA and LSV.  2-3" across a very large area (including the snow that melts.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to argue with a pretty decent model consensus getting notable accumulating snow pretty far into the Sus Valley, although I’ve been working on trying to be more cautious with these type of situations there this season after learning the hard way the last couple seasons. I’m still leery southeast of I-81. Comparison of the high res short range guidance shows some differences. HRRR has a much colder column, allowing the widespread snowfall as far into the Sus Valley as it goes. The 3k NAM (not the coarser 12k NAM) definitely isn’t as enthused, and looks pretty close to what CTP has out for a snowmap right now, not showing much at all in the LSV . That particular model erodes 850mb much faster in the Sus Valley and keeps most accumulating snow even out of Harrisburg. Adding to that, here’s what the 0z run of SPC’s HREF has, which looks similar to the 3k NAM. 

582700921_SPCHREFEnsembleViewer-12-hrsnowfallensmean.thumb.png.4387295510bdfe354be43ac51c1976bd.png

So just keeping things in perspective a bit, showing there are some high res short range things that don’t show the explosion of snow in the Sus Valley. I tend to think reality lies somewhere in between, as there should be enough cold to start things as snow in a good portion of the Sus Valley especially if precip gets here in a timely fashion and there are good rates. Top end accums are another thing to get sorted out. A lot of the short range and global guidance have no problem getting high end advisory amounts, with some full blown WSW type amounts in the interior south central counties. Still trying to figure whether I would want to pull the trigger on believing that or not. I do think the current advisory counties should be bumped up from their 1-3” to at least 2-4” with some scattered 5”.. and perhaps getting the 1” line to I-83 with Harrisburg maybe 1-2”. That would be my “safe” call with this. My worry is the HRRR is too cold.. and some of the short range stuff was a couple degrees too cold with the last event. I’m also not completely ruling out the colder, snowier HRRR type solution either. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Switching gears to the post front phase of this storm, really concerned about the combo of the cold and wind. I mentioned this earlier today but I’m going to illustrate. 

1720572496_3kNAMillustration.thumb.png.691320822913fc39f90b85f3e8e394c9.png

With the position of the very deep low, the westerly flow transports the arctic air from the north-central states underneath the lakes, meaning the unfrozen lakes aren’t going to modify the air via a NW flow like if this had been say.. a major coastal low lifting up the coast. It obviously does no good for much snow anywhere in C-PA once past whatever ends up right behind the actual front and maybe some lighter upslope type stuff in the Laurels. It sure will for western NY though, where BUF south probably sees x number of feet of snow again to go with their 40-60mph winds.

At any rate, I really don’t think this is a situation where the cold “modifies” as it gets closer to the time it arrives. On the contrary, I think this is a situation that may be underestimated a bit. I used the 3k NAM for illustration, which is plenty cold showing temps getting below zero in the Laurels/NW PA. That’s also not the coldest frame as by 12z Sat, KAOO and UNV are also below zero with MDT around 5 or so. That’s where the wind has to be considered. I’m still not sure LSV sees crazy winds from this but you combine those temps with even 35-45mph gusts and you easily have wind chill advisory criteria in the whole Sus Valley. 

Here’s the 3k’s wind chills at 12z Sat morning:

123441628_NAMApparent.thumb.png.4a27a45e2e7adf2e587aba22bf9b3cbc.png

And since I mentioned about my worry that the HRRR might be too cold with the front end precip tomorrow, I might as well also mention that the last full HRRR run back at 0z was much colder than even this 3k NAM, having JST at -11ºF, -8 & -6 at AOO and UNV respectively and near 0 temps all the way to H-burg at the end of its range which is only 0z Sat. That is while having 50-60 mph wind gusts in the Laurels/immediately adjacent central with 35-40mph elsewhere at that point. So with all that, wind chills are practically off the charts for this region (nearly -40ºF in the Laurels) and -15 to -20ºF in MDT. I’d say thats probably a bit over the top, but either way I still believe the wind chill watch areas should go to warnings pretty easily, with the rest of the area seeing advisories. 

To put things simply, Friday night into the first half of Christmas Eve is going to be brutal until the wind starts settling down. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...