Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Son of April Fool's Birch Bender


HoarfrostHubb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

All joking aside, the dynamics in this thing are the elephant in the room...and in a good way. I would say anyone forecasting minimal impact should have Bruce Willis caution flags in the back of their mind...even for your area. It's hard to actually forecast gung ho, but I would be quite uncomfortable.

 

Seeing that bowling ball going right under us is asking for positive bust....but we'll see.

I never wish bad on good mets but some narcissistic Mets need their arse handed to them this time. Oh how I pray for a positive bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

That's my key, it's a cold air funnel, been watching it like a hawk. Great pickup

We kinda need that vort lobe swinging around that associated ULL to keep the heights aheadof this system down and increase confluence aloft. If that storm wasn't there we'd probably have too much downstream ridging and this would be a torchfest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

All joking aside, the dynamics in this thing are the elephant in the room...and in a good way. I would say anyone forecasting minimal impact should have Bruce Willis caution flags in the back of their mind...even for your area. It's hard to actually forecast gung ho, but I would be quite uncomfortable.

 

Seeing that bowling ball going right under us is asking for positive bust....but we'll see.

For sure. I'm definitely concerned I'm too low and seriously considered going higher, but I decided to hedge a little bit on the map as it goes both ways - a small shift colder and we're looking at widespread warning level totals even down to Scooter/Kevin, but a small shift the other way and it's little/nothing south of route 2. I tried to outline the solutions and uncertianty in the discussion and did show what a GFS solution would look like, so I'd hope that if we do verify colder and I end up having to raise totals tomorrow morning there's at least an understanding that it's a possibility.  Tough forecast for sure - fun challenge to close out the season with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Matthew Gross said:

Another key to watch is going to be that huge ocean storm southeast of Newfoundland. If that goes any further west, you're probably talking about an even colder solution here with the Quebec High further west / more entrenched. In many ways, the ocean storm is driving / setting the table for this event.

The ocean storm is absolutely a factor in maintaining confluence... this poster above I believe was first to mention it

Again I wonder if this is something globals handle better than mesos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SR Airglow said:

For sure. I'm definitely concerned I'm too low and seriously considered going higher, but I decided to hedge a little bit on the map as it goes both ways - a small shift colder and we're looking at widespread warning level totals even down to Scooter/Kevin, but a small shift the other way and it's little/nothing south of route 2. I tried to outline the solutions and uncertianty in the discussion and did show what a GFS solution would look like, so I'd hope that if we do verify colder and I end up having to raise totals tomorrow morning there's at least an understanding that it's a possibility.  Tough forecast for sure - fun challenge to close out the season with.

Yeah I would stay conservative for sure, but definitely highlight the bust potential...which in this storm I feel has a long distribution tail to the positive side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dendrite said:

We kinda need that vort lobe swinging around that associated ULL to keep the heights aheadof this system down and increase confluence aloft. If that storm wasn't there we'd probably have too much downstream ridging and this would be a torchfest.

Yep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Everybody needs to get burned once in a while to stay honest.

Nobody can claim a perfect record.

It's not even that, it's the condescending cocky attitudes that some exhibit.  Thank God not here but being a social butterfly I see and hear things that make me cringe. Like I said earlier many blamed the Euro for their bust last storm when in fact it was their wrong interpretation of model output.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ginx snewx said:

It's not even that, it's the condescending cocky attitudes that some exhibit.  Thank God not here but being a social butterfly I see and hear things that make me cringe. Like I said earlier many blamed the Euro for their bust last storm when in fact it was their wrong interpretation of model output.

There's a Bruce Willis flag right there.

Own your bust, don't blame it on a model. Especially the GFS, that's just an easy target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Back on subject, what do you think of the GFS and it's odd cold solutions this time 

Given the mid level tracks, it's possible it stays that cold aloft. I have my doubts that some warmth doesn't sneak in though.

But I am rooting for the GFS. Zero QPF for my first week of the honeymoon according to the meteogram. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah it has been insistent on that.

It's really weird to see the differing models not backing down from their major differences so late in the game. Something has to give soon.

Date: 24 hour NAM valid 0Z SAT  1 APR 17
Station: 42.27,-71.88
Latitude:   42.27
Longitude: -71.88
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEV PRES  HGHT  TEMP  DEWP  RH  DD   WETB DIR SPD THETA THE-V THE-W THE-E   W
     mb     m     C     C    %   C     C  deg knt   K     K     K     K    g/kg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  0 1000   140                                                                 
SFC 1000   140   0.6  -0.3  94  0.8   0.2  82   8 273.7 274.3 273.4 283.9  3.75
  2  950   549  -2.5  -2.8  97  0.4  -2.6  95  24 274.7 275.2 273.2 283.6  3.26
  3  900   978  -2.3  -2.9  96  0.5  -2.6 116  27 279.1 279.7 276.0 288.7  3.44
  4  850  1432  -1.2  -1.5  98  0.3  -1.3 153  25 284.9 285.6 279.7 296.3  4.02
  5  800  1919   1.5   1.2  98  0.3   1.4 208  36 292.8 293.7 284.5 307.9  5.23
  6  750  2439   1.1   0.8  98  0.3   0.9 221  30 297.7 298.7 286.6 313.7  5.40
  7  700  2992  -1.7  -2.1  97  0.4  -1.9 227  20 300.6 301.5 287.0 314.7  4.70
  8  650  3579  -4.8  -5.8  92  1.1  -5.2 234  15 303.6 304.3 287.2 315.3  3.81
  9  600  4205  -8.0  -9.3  90  1.3  -8.5 249  14 306.9 307.5 287.6 316.7  3.15
 10  550  4876 -11.7 -13.2  89  1.5 -12.2 246  20 310.2 310.7 288.2 318.2  2.51
 11  500  5600 -16.5 -18.3  86  1.8 -17.0 251  22 312.9 313.3 288.3 318.9  1.81

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Cooler or warmer..which is It ?

It's cooler early on but warmer Sat AM...the thermals look so weird though, like these pockets of cooler air and they don't even match with the best omega.

The mid-levels still look awesome and they go nuts early Sat...but the warmth just rots there and I'm not sure what the mechanism is for it. It takes a long time to cool back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

It's cooler early on but warmer Sat AM...the thermals look so weird though, like these pockets of cooler air and they don't even match with the best omega.

The mid-levels still look awesome and they go nuts early Sat...but the warmth just rots there and I'm not sure what the mechanism is for it. It takes a long time to cool back.

Tossed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Tossed.

I'm leaning that way, but we'll see. It's kind of annoying that each model isn't really budging much. Hopefully the RGEM goes more on the colder side and then I'll feel better about tossing the NAM. At least all the mesos aren't going lockstep like the trend leading up to 3/14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...