Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Met Winter Banter


dmillz25

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

thanks for the good words boys

 

Take a look here

 

http://w2.weather.gov/climate/calendar_outlook.php?wfo=okx

 

77% normal or above  Jan-Feb-March

 

just sayin

 

I am +1 J-M . 

 

Most of the guidance is in step with AN 2M .

 

WSI is there and some others on the board are as well .

 

The key will be can we and where do we lock off at 500 . Can we get into a favorable precip pattern with N 850s .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cik

Global W

Hiatus

SnoSki

Snowman

Were all on board with the CFS and argued against and totally dismissed the pattern change.

Sooooo.....if I read this right, we can have marginal temps but if snow comes at the right time, like at night, or brings some cold air with it, we can get snowstorms in that kind of setup, as long as we are not like +10, am I getting this right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations.   But one day 'does not a trend make'.  That is why there is a daily output and a 5 day and 10 day average for the CFS.

When the 5 and 10 day keel over I will believe it (if it makes meteorological sense).   Meanwhile the experimental 60 day CFS analog still never has the mean value line dip below the normal line for the duration around here.    After Jan. 20 about 70% of the members are still favoring above normal.

 

The GFS often moves a potential storm hundreds of miles from the same run 24hrs. earlier.  Probably both are wrong.

 

More timely, today's SST @ CI is 53 or +9.   Yesterday it was 52----should I now assume it is on the way up and will be 54 tomorrow---or is it better to use the travelling 5 day average to predict tomorrow.

 

But clearly something kick started the model into the right direction.   Heights are lower in the southerly jet.  I am in the wait and see camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooooo.....if I read this right, we can have marginal temps but if snow comes at the right time, like at night, or brings some cold air with it, we can get snowstorms in that kind of setup, as long as we are not like +10, am I getting this right?

The forecast is N to plus 2 at the surface Temps over a 10 day period.

N 850s for early Jan are -5. So N 850s with sunny skies and a bare ground probably warm to about +2 or 3 Norm highs at KNYC 38 in early Jan Nittany maybe a tick warmer but I think we are close.

Jan 1 - 5 on the euro are -3 850 anomalies for that 5 day period , so that's probably N . It's the 5th thru the 10th that are showing AN .

But be careful they keep cooling as we get closer.

But the fact that the 500 mb pattern is such that HP flows through the lakes and if anything attacks and stays to your S and E those N 850s (-5) all of a sudden become snow at the surface.

Day or Night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations.   But one day 'does not a trend make'.  That is why there is a daily output and a 5 day and 10 day average for the CFS.

When the 5 and 10 day keel over I will believe it (if it makes meteorological sense).   Meanwhile the experimental 60 day CFS analog still never has the mean value line dip below the normal line for the duration around here.    After Jan. 20 about 70% of the members are still favoring above normal.

 

The GFS often moves a potential storm hundreds of miles from the same run 24hrs. earlier.  Probably both are wrong.

 

More timely, today's SST @ CI is 53 or +9.   Yesterday it was 52----should I now assume it is on the way up and will be 54 tomorrow---or is it better to use the travelling 5 day average to predict tomorrow.

 

But clearly something kick started the model into the right direction.   Heights are lower in the southerly jet.  I am in the wait and see camp.

 

 

 

This is one day ? 

summaryCFSv2.NaT2m.201601.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cik

Global W

Hiatus

SnoSki

Snowman

Were all on board with the CFS and argued against and totally dismissed the pattern change.

I clearly agreed we would see a huge step down from December but still AN overall, which looks on point as of now. Beside an occasional 2-4 BN days (1st half of Jan) temps look to be AN though much closer to seasonal than we've seen.

And you can't declare victory prematurely either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I clearly agreed we would see a huge step down from December but still AN overall, which looks on point as of now. Beside an occasional 2-4 BN days (1st half of Jan) temps look to be AN though much closer to seasonal than we've seen.

And you can't declare victory prematurely either.

You did nothing of the sort .

ME

Dude 2 more weeks of this and the torch is over. OVER

You are now on record believing this pattern doesn't change til February and think it's possible that we have a snowless winter because of a warm December.

YOU

Yes possible but I'm not favoring a snowless winter and yes the rest is correct and noted.

The call was A TOTAL pattern flip at 500 and 2m N to plus 2 , you are plus 6 for the month . Are you still plus 6 seeing the guidance leaving you ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ask yourself....

who do I trust in the forum?

what insight do I glean?

 

we have seen some very poor progs in the past 

myself included---

 

  (the NWS bombo last season?) FAIL

 

with that in mind 

you have got to fight for your right

to bring us a snow--- PARTAY!!!!!

 

till then,I won"t swing at EL NINO   :pimp:

 

http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/UA/OPC_ATL.gif

 

Greenland with 1015 HP ATM

does not give me any good vibes!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accuweather Jan. outlook has no spectacular highs or lows or much mention of snow.    It predicts a low of 20 for the month, which keeps us in the running for the highest low temperature for a winter ever.   In 2001-2 thermometer spent less than an hour all winter under 20, bottoming twice at 19degs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0z Euro shows -NAO ,-AO ,+PNA

 

 

THE TRIFECTAAAA

Accuweather Jan. outlook has no spectacular highs or lows or much mention of snow.    It predicts a low of 20 for the month, which keeps us in the running for the highest low temperature for a winter ever.   In 2001-2 thermometer spent less than an hour all winter under 20, bottoming twice at 19degs.

Don't look at Accucrap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accuweather Jan. outlook has no spectacular highs or lows or much mention of snow. It predicts a low of 20 for the month, which keeps us in the running for the highest low temperature for a winter ever. In 2001-2 thermometer spent less than an hour all winter under 20, bottoming twice at 19degs.

lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is talking snow. No need to move the goal posts here.

The trough axis is too far east and snow is not modeled nor expected.

We can get back to the pattern change that many of you called transient and a head fake.

Looks like the models show  the  northern stream dominating  for early January . Correct me if I am wrong but during El Nino winters, the STJ doesn't really get cranking until mid  to late January. Patience =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is better than being much colder with no snow like some years from the past...the ao is forecast to go negative in January...until then enjoy the warmth and low heating bills...

 

Too bad the block near Scandinavia didn't pop over Greenland. Those anomalies would have tanked the 

AO below -5.000 if they happened closer to Greenland. That is a near record block for that location in late

December.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad the block near Scandinavia didn't pop over Greenland. Those anomalies would have tanked the 

AO below -5.000 if they happened closer to Greenland. That is a near record block for that location in late

December.

 

attachicon.giff120.gif

a minus five is worlds apart from a plus four for the ao this time of year...the forecast is for a down trend...twt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad the block near Scandinavia didn't pop over Greenland. Those anomalies would have tanked the

AO below -5.000 if they happened closer to Greenland. That is a near record block for that location in late

December.

f120.gif

The Kara Sea high is beyond impressive, it is absolutely ridiculous based on what I've seen historically.

Anyway, regarding this pattern the split flow nature of this in the 11-15 day would not be a cold signal on the east coast. This is one of those situations where the teleconnections look better, but the east still gets flooded with mild air.

Still think the playbook here is to follow the Nino filtered MJO analogs. They argue this cool shot is likely underforecast short term and consequently the GEFS would likely be too cold 11-15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a minus five is worlds apart from a plus four for the ao this time of year...the forecast is for a down trend...twt...

 

That gradient setting up between the extreme block and the deep low is pretty impressive.

Probably not a good time to take the sailboat between Iceland and Ireland. ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Kara Sea high is beyond impressive, it is absolutely ridiculous based on what I've seen historically.

Anyway, regarding this pattern the split flow nature of this in the 11-15 day would not be a cold signal on the east coast. This is one of those situations where the teleconnections look better, but the east still gets flooded with mild air.

Still think the playbook here is to follow the Nino filtered MJO analogs. They argue this cool shot is likely underforecast short term and consequently the GEFS would likely be too cold 11-15.

 

I believe it's the most impressive block in that location since Late January and early February 2012.

When you see those 500 mb anomalies cranking over 500 meters above average, you know something

major is going on. There has been plenty of research on the enhanced blocking in that location

over the last decade or so related to the very low sea ice there into the winter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Kara Sea high is beyond impressive, it is absolutely ridiculous based on what I've seen historically.

Anyway, regarding this pattern the split flow nature of this in the 11-15 day would not be a cold signal on the east coast. This is one of those situations where the teleconnections look better, but the east still gets flooded with mild air.

Still think the playbook here is to follow the Nino filtered MJO analogs. They argue this cool shot is likely underforecast short term and consequently the GEFS would likely be too cold 11-15.

Those are small sample sized. Days 11 thru 15 end up N In the east. The NEG is too far west in AK.

Days 5 thru 10 cooled the same way . After that D15 on the Euro ensembles are about to deepen that trough into the east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...