Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

NYC/PHL 12/21-12/27 Forecast Threats


am19psu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 995
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Arguing about ratios on a storm 6 days out... :lol:Anyway, just remember that the GFS has a slight wet bias and the EC has a slight dry bias, QPF-wise.

I think you're a bit softspoken on our threads but I really do value your opinion, as you've seemed pretty dead on so far except when the Euro confused you a little for this past non-event. So, what are you thinking? Does the h500 pattern truly support a bomb, or more of what DT is thinking. I ask you because you're completely indifferent, given your location, but if we do get this storm there's plenty of room chez-moi if you wanna come stay.:drunk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GFS gives 18-25" throughout area.... lol facepalm.png

If you overlay the GFS charts onto the Euro, they have good agreement at surface and h5 for days 5, 6, and 7. But the GFS is about 12 hours faster, so the comparison, for example, is Euro Day 6 vs. GFS Day 5.5. Obviously there are differences, but this degree of agreement for 144hrs is very encouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's about a 70% chance of a widespread 1-3/2-4" snow event, a 50% of a 3-6/4-8" widespread event, a 30% of a 6-12" widespread event, and a 5% of a widespread 12"+ event. I like these odds, let's see what happens.

Yeah, I'll go with 4-8 now.... anything more than that would be a pleasant surprise. Where do you get these odds from btw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're a bit softspoken on our threads but I really do value your opinion, as you've seemed pretty dead on so far except when the Euro confused you a little for this past non-event.

A lot of us were confused :arrowhead:

So, what are you thinking? Does the h500 pattern truly support a bomb, or more of what DT is thinking. I ask you because you're completely indifferent, given your location, but if we do get this storm there's plenty of room chez-moi if you wanna come stay.:drunk:

I definitely wouldn't say I'm indifferent... especially with this storm. :snowman: I'm going to be particularly soft spoken with this storm... the GFS depiction is a dream-come-true (for me too, not just you). I always guard against a miss because its such a big let down, and this time I'm gonna be even more guarded. But yes, I think the pattern is favorable... but that doesn't always mean there's a storm. An interesting study project I might undertake if I ever get back east would be to go back and see how often a favorable pattern DIDN'T produce. Then again, someone might've done that already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His head, probably...I can't believe we're throwing out totals at 150 hours.

I'm basing my odds on what the models are doing and the overall look to the pattern. I agree though that it's probably too early to focus on totals but people spent over a page discussing QPF and BUFKIT from the gfs. I need more model agreement from the Ukie, and GGEM before we go any further, but it's always fun to discuss snow amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His head, probably...I can't believe we're throwing out totals at 150 hours.

Setting up for disaster again. You know, the usual. :rolleyes:

At least this one has a better chance. It's just a matter of how much. It could track over us and be weak with only light precip. It could be suppressed and only give us light precip or only people to the south. This one has a better chance of giving us snow at least, but I agree throwing out amounts this early is a bit much. I'm sure we can find some maps on the accuwx forums if we wanted. haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Word. Imagine sitting at home with snow falling and a whitened ground with 4-8" while, depending on your beliefs, your Christmas tree is all lit with the family in the house.

Even with a few inches, considering the day, it would make last week's bust (today's actually lol) a distant memory!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after this weekends model fiasco i wouldnt be even thinking about issuing a snowfall map etc. even just rough numbers off a qpf map until were inside 96 hours or less. you gotta admit this storm has atleast taught me to be very cautious with every storm, granted the setup had to be prefect for it to happen anyway and really had to have a miracle for it to happen. the setup with this storm is great though and im excited about it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after this weekends model fiasco i wouldnt be even thinking about issuing a snowfall map etc. even just rough numbers off a qpf map until were inside 96 hours or less. you gotta admit this storm has atleast taught me to be very cautious with every storm, granted the setup had to be prefect for it to happen anyway and really had to have a miracle for it to happen. the setup with this storm is great though and im excited about it too.

It's also reassuring that the shortwave will technically be on the CONUS in 72 hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...