Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,029
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Atlantic Tropical Action 2014


Recommended Posts

92L is certainly intriguing. The circulation still appears to be closed, with a decent amount of westerly winds to the south of the convection over the Bahamas. Note the interesting wind shift that took place in Great Abaco Bahama earlier today. While 10-15 knot westerlies might not sound like much, that's more than what the global models are depicting currently. The easterly winds are likely stronger in the northern quadrant where the deep convection is ongoing. Pressure is still steady around 1014 hPa, but should typically be rising in a typical diurnal cycle. It will be interesting to watch these stations to see if there are any significant changes during the overnight hours. 

 

gji5D4d.png

 

mLhx4X4.png

 

There is a really strong shear axis just to its north which is dropping south with time. So I agree 92L will probably have to keep dropping south if it wants to survive. However, I don't think the global models have an adequate depiction of the current organization of the circulation. Small systems like this often fly under the radar so to speak, and sometimes these relatively small llc's that form from upper-level TUTTs can be suprise developers (e.g. Michael 2012).

 

The key though is the convective organization. If it can build a symmetrical cirrus canopy, small systems like this can spin up quickly. If it doesn't do that before the shear hits though, its game over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

As the mid/upper ridge strengthened, so the shear has increased as well. Now we have a decoupled mid and low level vortices. The surface low is still north of the Abaco Islands, while the mid level vortex is moving WSW and is currently north of the Grand Bahama...unless there's a better stacked up low, I expect little development in the short term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the mid/upper ridge strengthened, so the shear has increased as well. Now we have a decoupled mid and low level vortices. The surface low is still north of the Abaco Islands, while the mid level vortex is moving WSW and is currently north of the Grand Bahama...unless there's a better stacked up low, I expect little development in the short term.

Would a stronger ridge to the north lend more confidence in a southern FL track rather than Central FL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the mid/upper ridge strengthened, so the shear has increased as well. Now we have a decoupled mid and low level vortices. The surface low is still north of the Abaco Islands, while the mid level vortex is moving WSW and is currently north of the Grand Bahama...unless there's a better stacked up low, I expect little development in the short term.

Now that I take a closer look at the radar, I do see two distinct circulations with the mid level one being more SW. It's probably compliments of shear since the main convection is moving SW along with the shear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the environment 92L is presently in is quite good. However, shear has been increasing steadily just 100-200 km to its north, and there's also some subsidence in the area. The fact that it's such a small system will make it more vulnerable to a deterioration of its environment. I'd say it's best chance is if it begins drifting southward overnight. A track along the lines of the NAM would probably be ideal.

It looks like the quite good conditions for development that we agreed were there yesterday have deteriorated due to the NE shear that you noted increasing just north of the system last night. It doesn't look as stacked to me now and it didn't take long for this to occur as it was still looking pretty good well into the evening. My prior thinking of 2/3 chance for TD+

while still E of FL is looking quite a bit too high to me now despite there apparently still being a pretty good LLC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8NdnMTJ.gif

 

Even though the vertical wind shear is increasing over 92L, note that the the upper-levels will also be very diffluent over 92L as the upper-level low to 92L's northeast is causing some upper-level wind vectors to shift back westerly. This is one of the reasons the initial dry air over the region has moistened rapidly the last 12-18 hours. This should also allow convection to continue to pulse which will mitigate the strongest easterly vertical shear the next 24-48 hours. Center relocations south and west further into the deep convection are also entirely possible, and in fact might be trying to occur currently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Even though the vertical wind shear is increasing over 92L, note that the the upper-levels will also be very diffluent over 92L as the upper-level low to 92L's northeast is causing some upper-level wind vectors to shift back westerly. This is one of the reasons the initial dry air over the region has moistened rapidly the last 12-18 hours. This should also allow convection to continue to pulse which will mitigate the strongest easterly vertical shear the next 24-48 hours. Center relocations south and east further into the deep convection are also entirely possible, and in fact might be trying to occur currently. 

west?

 

It appears that the current burst of deep convection is doing the trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

west?

 

It appears that the current burst of deep convection is doing the trick.

 

Haha yes... I mean west. In any event, I have yet to see a model that currently depicts the current large region of stratiform and embedded convective precipitation. The GFS has no convection over the region that currently has < -60 oC tops. Because the pressure minimum with the system is not that significant, its should be relatively easy for convection to result in a new center formation since there isn't much inertial stability in the circulation. If the convection collapses it could similarly destroy the vortex. 

 

92L.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...