Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,518
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    bowsunski
    Newest Member
    bowsunski
    Joined

December 24-25 Snowstorm


Jim Martin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

12Z NAM puts yet another nail into the coffin for the storm in my area. I'm so sick to death of this pattern. :arrowhead:

as the bus driver it's my duty to tell you to sit down and be quiet....we will make it to our destination. I'm now taking the perilous route that includes the idea of a much slower system, an earlier phase, and inland event.....buckle up!

:snowman::drunk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

storm cancel...:axe:

although the SREF spread gives us some hope lol hilarious how the models were pretty set on a solution for days and now we get this! gotta love model mayhem

The Euro was all over the super slow and suppressed solution and i was too arrogant to accept it. It's only a matter of time before the GFS retreats.

EDIT: i also see talk of phasing, but i don't see anything close to a good phase being modeled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as the bus driver it's my duty to tell you to sit down and be quiet....we will make it to our destination. I'm now taking the perilous route that includes the idea of a much slower system, an earlier phase, and inland event.....buckle up!

:snowman::drunk:

Main ingredient is the speed and the phase. If its faster I think we have a better shot, or we need to pray for a nw shift, and we get an inland runner. I'm riding the GFS train. On another note, I don't think I have ever seen you this determined lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just some musings and observations this morning...

This is looking like the classic Euro SW/4 Corners area bias. I could be wrong here, but the thing that tripped me off was that it took the model 24 hours to move the vort from So. Cal to central New Mexico, and it's very fast to close it off after coming onshore. That's extremely slow when the flow (and thermal wind pattern) is basically due W-E (zonal). ALL mesoscale models and model members at that range push it right along. This general disagreement between the mesoscale modeling systems and the global models may be symptomatic.

Another big thing I've noticed is the handling of the vorticity fields in the northern stream. There is going to be a chaotic pattern from the W. Coast over to the Canadian Prairies due to the disintegrating block, the amplifying ridge out west, and the trough and trough extension to the east. The globals seem eager to generate a good deal of vort energy between these features (as well as a shortwave cutting under the ridge in B. Col.) and when the ridge begins to seriously amplify, they in turn eject (or "flush") all of this relatively disorganized vort energy downstream to interact with the southern wave. The mesoscale modeling systems have shown no such scenario and are much more bearish on both the strength and phasing of this energy.

Good write up. I enjoyed reading it and I appreciated the points you made.

I agree with what you said about the European "southwest bias". I saw the ensemble mean was a bit further north and a bit faster, for what it is worth.

In any event, if the series of amplifications will vacate the Southwest Corners area sooner, would phasing in the Midwest/continued amplification be more likely?

The reason I ask is looking at the 06Z GFS within the first 72 hours it still holds on to a monster west Atlantic low. While that system is in a state of decay and will eventually move as the Greenland block begins to break and the NAO begins to turn less negative, it is still there. I'm trying to conceive a long wave pattern with a monster upper-air low in the west Atlantic and a developing low in the Midwest. That's a hard pattern for me to visualize. Just throwing some thoughts out there...

I have written this storm off for Northeast Ohio.

This is the AFD from OKX (Brookhaven, NY) which I thought was good:

NW FLOW ALOFT INTO FRIDAY GIVES WAY TO WEAK RIDGING FRIDAY

NIGHT-SATURDAY. CLOSED 500 HPA LOW DIVES INTO THE CENTRAL

APPALACHIANS BY SUNDAY MORNING...SUPPORTING A STRONG SURFACE LOW

NEAR THE NC/VA CAPES. THE LOW THEN LIFTS NE...ALONG WITH THE 500 HPA

LOW. THE CMC GLOBAL LIKELY IS TO FAR NW WITH ITS LOW TRACK...GIVEN

THE STRONG BAROCLINIC ZONE NEAR THE NORTH WALL OF THE GULF

STREAM...BUT WITH MODEL CONSENSUS GROWING TOWARDS A TRACK INLAND OF

THE N WALL...OPTED FOR A ECMWF TRACK WITH THE STORM...TAKING IT

INSIDE THE 70/40 BENCHMARK...BUT PER ECMWF THERMAL FIELDS...JUST FAR

ENOUGH OFFSHORE TO KEEP ANY RAIN/SNOW MIX JUST OFFSHORE. BASED ON

CMC TIMING...WOULD EXPECT THE LOW TO BE NEAR CAPE COD MONDAY MORNING.

THE GFS HAS FLIPPED FLOPPED FROM ITS 18Z RUN GOING FROM THE LOW

LINGERING OVER THE WESTERN CANADIAN MARITIMES...TO RIDGING BUILDING

IN...AS THIS IS INCONSISTENT WITH A LIKELY CUTOFF LOW...OPTED FOR A

SOLUTION CLOSER TO THE ECMWF MONDAY...WITH THE REGION IN CYCLONIC

FLOW BEHIND THE STORM.

In my opinion the GFS has done really poorly (in the medium range)with at

least the last 4 short-wave amplifications affecting the eastern 1/2 of the nation.

It's difficult for me to accept the output after about 72 hours or so with

this storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Main ingredient is the speed and the phase. If its faster I think we have a better shot, or we need to pray for a nw shift, and we get an inland runner. I'm riding the GFS train. On another note, I don't think I have ever seen you this determined lol

the nam at 84 is pathetic looking to me....so im throwing it out lol. seriously there is virtually no ridging ahead of the sw in the east. I think we also need something stronger in the northern stream to come down and phase in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the nam at 84 is pathetic looking to me....so im throwing it out lol. seriously there is virtually no ridging ahead of the sw in the east. I think we also need something stronger in the northern stream to come down and phase in.

A few things I don't get, for one, typically when N and S streams phase close to us, we normally do good, but even on ensembles that show this scenario, it is just ehh. And wth happened to the north trend we have see with every single storm this year? What is making this one so much different than the others. Ill be shocked if both the gfs and euro hold their ground today. One or the other is going to give soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few things I don't get, for one, typically when N and S streams phase close to us, we normally do good, but even on ensembles that show this scenario, it is just ehh. And wth happened to the north trend we have see with every single storm this year? What is making this one so much different than the others. Ill be shocked if both the gfs and euro hold their ground today. One or the other is going to give soon.

mets can correct me here, but our biggest issue has been the damn confluence over the ne and the stubborn vortex. Simply put we can't get a ridge of any decency to pop out ahead of this system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's an illustration of one of my biggest concerns for my region regarding the xmas event. Basically a strong low emerges from the central rockies, begins to move east spreading a nice swath of snow to about Indiana, then dives southeast towards the southern TN valley where it begins redevelopment and carries up the coast. Leaving a large screw zone centered over ohio and points north.

This happens from time to time....see Feb '06. Even January '96 had a similar track however we were saved due to the fact once it got to the coast it slowed down enough to throw a comma head all the way back here, (but if we had to count on the low bringing us moisture as it swung south of us, we wouldn't have gotten anything).

then again, it could be a pdll event :snowman:

....and of course lets not forget the other potential issues. It simply peters out and doesn' t phase. It phases earlier and tracks north.

As of right now, i give cmh a 30% chance of a 3"+ snow event xmas.

I think your map's gonna verify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think your map's gonna verify.

Wow that screw zone is perfectly placed. Its ok. Most Mets around here called for the heavier snows after December so patience and it will come

assuming it verifies....

the victory is bittersweet :axe:

btw, the gfs still slowing down the sw....pretty soon this will be the new years day storm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good write up. I enjoyed reading it and I appreciated the points you made.

I agree with what you said about the European "southwest bias". I saw the ensemble mean was a bit further north and a bit faster, for what it is worth.

In any event, if the series of amplifications will vacate the Southwest Corners area sooner, would phasing in the Midwest/continued amplification be more likely?

The reason I ask is looking at the 06Z GFS within the first 72 hours it still holds on to a monster west Atlantic low. While that system is in a state of decay and will eventually move as the Greenland block begins to break and the NAO begins to turn less negative, it is still there. I'm trying to conceive a long wave pattern with a monster upper-air low in the west Atlantic and a developing low in the Midwest. That's a hard pattern for me to visualize. Just throwing some thoughts out there...

I have written this storm off for Northeast Ohio.

4 days out and you have written this off? Granted NE Ohio would be on the far northern fringes... but I don't know about writing it off at this point. I'm still enjoying the ride on the Buckeye bus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should have known the euro was right....again.

Im gonna lol if euro is north now lol.

Im off the bus towel is thrown. So tired of this bs garbage. GL to the ec then, back to normal life. Should've known it wouldn't work out. Done. :) Buckeye, just wreck the bus off the cliff and put us all out of our misery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...