Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,217

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. brooklynwx99
    this is awesome. can even see some ridging trying to form on the WC despite BN heights. active polar jet, very cold, -NAO decaying in a perfect spot
  2. brooklynwx99
    ready for 60s and 70s?
  3. brooklynwx99
    it moved that way too
  4. brooklynwx99
    EPS is definitely pushing that lobe under the block more. considerable change from last run
  5. brooklynwx99
    pretty significant change with heights east as well. definitely pushing that lobe under more
  6. brooklynwx99
    EPS does just that
  7. brooklynwx99
    the -NAO does not correlate to a SE ridge overall. the months with the strongest -NAOs often have a SE trough
  8. brooklynwx99
    that's in the far medium range, too. far from fantasy
  9. brooklynwx99
    this will work. HL blocking is insane
  10. brooklynwx99
    yeah, the wave breaking -NAOs are always so tricky. they're usually modeled way better when they're the classic retrograding Scandi blocks
  11. brooklynwx99
    yeah, the GEFS is a lot more like the CMC/GEPS than its own OP
  12. brooklynwx99
    you need to start here first. you know this
  13. brooklynwx99
    GEPS remains mint too
  14. brooklynwx99
    that western trough should retrograde into the typical Aleutian Low for Feb
  15. brooklynwx99
    yup, the GFS evolution is just delayed, not denied. you still get legit Arctic air into the pattern, it’s gotta go somewhere
  16. brooklynwx99
    no you don’t. you guys can hit average in 48 hours. definitely a couple of weeks
  17. brooklynwx99
    at the same time, i think the lack of retrogression on the GFS is due to the fact that it buries everything out west and you don’t have that final wave break
  18. brooklynwx99
    i think the GFS just buries it. doesn’t mean that it’s correct. even if it is correct, it just delays the cold air outbreak for a few days, it wouldn’t be disastrous or anything
  19. brooklynwx99
    prob shouldn’t be using OP runs, but there’s a big disparity here I feel like the CMC makes more sense synoptically, but who knows at this point
  20. brooklynwx99
    if you’re looking at the GFS, sure
  21. brooklynwx99
    one of these things is not like the other i do feel like the first depiction makes more sense synoptically but who knows at this point
  22. brooklynwx99
    i can't do this anymore LMAO i do not know what some people are talking about
  23. brooklynwx99
    the cutter on the 10th was going to be a cutter for like the last 10 days lmao
  24. brooklynwx99
    yup, pretty well defined trend here. that's making the difference, was definitely a nod to the GFS
  25. brooklynwx99
    definitely a trend to phase the kicker in earlier, leading to a much better PVA axis overhead. i'm inclined to believe the GFS is wrong, but this is worth watching
×
×
  • Create New...