Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,954

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. brooklynwx99
    the GFS has the TPV farther east and the ridge comes over the top, allowing the ULL to dig more compared to the ICON
  2. brooklynwx99
    can’t remember the last time we’ve seen subsidence like this over the MC… straight up P8 forcing late month
  3. brooklynwx99
    this system is honestly annoying the crap out of me at this point and I'd rather just get to the 18th, which has had a better chance all along
  4. brooklynwx99
    lol
  5. brooklynwx99
    this somehow produces like 3-6” of snow. how do you even make this up
  6. brooklynwx99
    always has to be something
  7. brooklynwx99
    usually when you have a vort of that intensity at that latitude it’s a nuke. truly incredible
  8. brooklynwx99
    PVA axis is more N-S
  9. brooklynwx99
    it’s gonna do it again
  10. brooklynwx99
    i mean, tick it more amped and you curl the PVA back west. it’s close
  11. brooklynwx99
    it really unreal how this isn’t a MECS at first glance. that vort is insane
  12. brooklynwx99
    yeah, stronger and more neg tilted
  13. brooklynwx99
    yeah, not as exotic as 12z but still a bomb
  14. brooklynwx99
    absolutely, allows that NS piece over the Lakes to come in at a good angle... that's why the GFS is as amped as it is
  15. brooklynwx99
    the +PNA ridge in and of itself argues for a coastal... that's 2.5 sigma over ID, nearly ideal
  16. brooklynwx99
    this is really as large of an amped shift as you'll see on the EPS at this range
  17. brooklynwx99
    the main differences between the GFS and the ECMWF are that the kicker on the ECMWF is more defined, hurting amplification, and the TPV is also closer to the trough. we'll see how those features trend overall, though, they are actually pretty similar from a synoptic standpoint now
  18. brooklynwx99
    the main differences between the GFS and the ECMWF are that the kicker on the ECMWF is more defined, hurting amplification, and the TPV is also closer to the trough. we'll see how those features trend overall, though, they are actually pretty similar from a synoptic standpoint now
  19. brooklynwx99
    the main differences between the GFS and the ECMWF are that the kicker on the ECMWF is more defined, hurting amplification, and the TPV is also closer to the trough. we'll see how those features trend overall, though, they are actually pretty similar from a synoptic standpoint now
  20. brooklynwx99
    could have been better, but yeah, hard to ask for a better shift
  21. brooklynwx99
    stop doing what? that is a significant move towards a more amplified solution... definitely much more than I thought was going to happen
  22. brooklynwx99
    bit of a shift here if you ask me
  23. brooklynwx99
    holy shit. let's go
  24. brooklynwx99
    wait until you see the euro
  25. brooklynwx99
    euro is notably more amped with the whole trough. holy shit
×
×
  • Create New...