Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. this is why it’s sometimes not as simple as worse PNA -> weaker storm… the TPV is better oriented and allows the vort to curl more on the ECMWF
  2. this is why it’s sometimes not as simple as worse PNA -> weaker storm… the TPV is better oriented and allows the vort to curl more
  3. the GEFS is so horribly underdispersive that the OP probably is influencing its ensemble 16 days later
  4. AIFS ENS actually looks pretty nice. I feel like this is more likely given the tropical forcing but who knows
  5. isn’t most of the warmth forecasting on this forum persistence forecasting? lmao
  6. ECMWF with a pretty significant improvement with heights out west. went from nothing to something
  7. thermal gradient aloft is pretty impressive so you really just a little bit of 500mb forcing
  8. nice Arctic wave. seeing the PNA get a bit better is a plus
  9. what would you consider “this?” i’d think there’s still a good bit of regression and generally unfavorable -ENSO/-PDO type stuff going on as well along with the compression you always mention
  10. west based blocking decaying around that time also argues for a storm popping up
  11. yeah, talk about dynamic. you have an actual ridge in the west, too. stout
  12. 12-13th might be an actual window to watch. nice to see the ridge out west trend taller, which helps shift the trough west as well
  13. nice to see the ridge out west trend taller. helps the trough location and amplitude
  14. yeah, can see heights trending higher in the West and the trough inching into a better spot as a result
  15. the weeklies usually defer to ENSO climo as you head later into the winter anyway
  16. personally, I usually go about saying what the pattern may call for (small to mod events) rather than saying that it can't satisfy the upper echelon of events. like how cold is it? will it be dry? what's the mean storm track like? what he said wasn't incorrect... I agree with him. I just think there's more value added saying what you can get or the flavor of the pattern itself rather stating that you won't see a NESIS level event. you will be able to do that 90% of the time
  17. i do think a larger storm is possible after the 15th into early Jan if the -NAO holds on and heights rise out west a bit more with help from tropical forcing, but that's way out there
  18. who was calling for one? I don't think anybody has mentioned the risk for one... seems like light to mod events generally my point was that saying that a pattern isn't conducive for historic storms isn't really saying all that much. you can say that about most patterns. it's like saying most football players won't make it to the NFL. it's implied
  19. to be fair, most patterns are "hostile to KUs." they're rare and require some specific features
  20. i mean, I don't think it's deniable that the pattern looks conducive for at BN temps for most of the month. looks a lot better than it did last week with the GEFS falling flat on its face. then, we should see that pattern continue into mid-late month aside from maybe a brief warmup around the 13th or so snow is more difficult to predict, though. the northern mid-Atlantic should see chances through the month, especially after the 15th IMO you know Tony just regurgitates that stuff though lmao
  21. who are you even following? nobody reputable is calling for that
×
×
  • Create New...