Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,052
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. i agree with you there. it's possible, but needs more support
  2. OP is obv on the more amped side of its own ensemble (though they're more or less different models at this point after the GFS got upgraded) the GEFS itself is more amped compared to its 06z run
  3. i said the same thing last night and I am lowkey shocked that the GFS amped up like that again
  4. this is really low predictability... you have the NS vort digging and then buckling, you have another wave out west trying to dampen upstream heights, and then you have the issue of how the TPV impacts the trough. what a mess
  5. yeah, it's been trending, as has the AIFS, which makes me feel a bit better CMC is snow showers, which is kinda hilarious. kind of in its own universe with the TPV
  6. meanwhile, the CMC has a beach ball of boredom over NE
  7. there’s just no way that’s right lmao i would like to see some more support
  8. agreed, 16th isn't impossible, but would take some doing in its current presentation
  9. yeah, nice to see that forcing move east into the CPAC and WHEM coinciding with the WWB taking place. should keep canonical Nina impacts at bay
  10. this is literally full of condescension and yet, you are going to say that i was being insulting after you said that my degree was undeserved and unearned. I am going to stop responding to you, as I do not want to clutter this thread, but you should look at what you're doing here. it's really not cool
  11. it was mentioned because my qualifications were questioned, as if the degree or title I earned was not deserved. it absolutely was
  12. true. at least the antecedent airmass is better... hopefully we can get some height suppression beforehand, should be a beefy vort
  13. GFS is explosive but I think it'll be tough to pull off... I think the 18th holds better potential with the 16th trying to act as some confluence
  14. you can't even really forecast events that far in the future... you just kinda have to look at trends and the general longwave pattern and see how that goes. i don't think any respectable met would make a deterministic forecast more than 72 hours out
  15. you're right. just kinda hard to take sometimes when someone's insulting your intelligence in that way. i worked my ass off for this lmao
  16. i literally won most forecasting competitions in my classes at school and had a negative Z-score in WxChallenge. just stop it
  17. lol the people at my job that I actually forecast for would beg to disagree. you're just an ass
  18. what else is there to do? not analyze models? that's what we're here for
  19. this is why we look at ensembles and not OP runs
  20. yeah i think that's the one to watch. very tough to get two waves in two days and the 18th has a more favorable config to work with
×
×
  • Create New...