Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,637
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. EPS is even more amped than 00z. insane for a mean at this range
  2. I would argue the GFS is the one with little to no support. GEPS, EPS, ECMWF, CMC, and UKMET all had amped solutions. GFS is the only one that’s pretty flat
  3. EPS is very amplified. what a look btw, that isn’t a SE ridge linking with the -NAO… those are height rises downstream from the amping vort
  4. EPS has trended back to its more exotic look from a couple days ago at 00z
  5. honestly, the AIFS hasn't been any more consistent than any other model, and this storm is 8 days out. too much emphasis is placed on it IMO
  6. nah i could go without being the scapegoat for less frozen water falling from the sky. i'm good
  7. lol no model shows a cutter. could it get a little too close for comfort for the immediate coast, sure, but i find it highly unlikely that we see a system cut through the Apps. more likely to see suppression than a wet outcome here
  8. like I can't look at this and not get a little excited. it has every synoptic feature you're looking for
  9. all we can use is the data we have right now. if things change, we can change our view on the pattern. right now, things look really good... we'll see what happens over the next few days. it's worth it to temper expectations but also acknowledge that there is heightened potential for a significant to even major storm around the 20th
  10. the EPS is wild again. stronger -NAO and 50/50, too, which I like. strong confluence is always a good thing here
  11. i mean, what is there to say? it's all there lmao
  12. this ring a bell? i’m not gonna say it out loud
  13. December 2022 had -PNA issues and Feb 2024 never really got going with the block never forming. this is inside of D10 so it's no longer pure fantasy and the PNA region is more favorable
  14. the block for Feb 2024 was tenuous and it never really formed. late Feb 2023 was in March, so it could have delivered, but it was too warm. and I don't recall March 2022 this time, the block is going to form and retrograde in an ideal location. just need to iron out the details
  15. not like this, though. not sure the last time we had a signal like that show up on all ensembles. maybe Feb 2021
  16. could be the one. this is a highly favorable look with the decaying block
  17. agreed. want to get into that D5-6 timeframe but for now, it seems as though a lot is aligning. hopefully we can pull together a thump for the NW posters with the 15-16th. unfortunate to see the confluence weaken in the worst spot
×
×
  • Create New...