Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,651

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. brooklynwx99
    CMC is going to phase too
  2. brooklynwx99
    yeah, much more like foreign guidance
  3. brooklynwx99
    massive change on the GFS
  4. brooklynwx99
    massive change on the GFS
  5. brooklynwx99
    just a massive change on the GFS
  6. brooklynwx99
    lol you’d think this was an awful winter for the area. let’s ignore the EPS, 12z OP ECMWF, GEPS, UKMET because of the GFS and AIFS
  7. brooklynwx99
    it’s been flopping around for days. not any better than any other piece of guidance
  8. brooklynwx99
    that isn't progressive. PNA is stronger and there is a strong closed low over MN. the low will pivot and bring PVA up
  9. brooklynwx99
    ECMWF looks just like the 12z EPS. nice to see
  10. brooklynwx99
    if this was the other way around with the GFS/GEFS only showing something and everything else relatively unenthused, the GFS would be launched to Pluto
  11. brooklynwx99
    that kicker actually helps pump the PNA for a brief time as the trough amps. pretty common before it flattens things, but if the spark is already lit it doesn't matter
  12. brooklynwx99
    EPS actually upped the ante from 00z
  13. brooklynwx99
    if the EPS has even a clue with this kind of look I think we're in for a significant event
  14. brooklynwx99
    EPS is even more amped than 00z. insane for a mean at this range
  15. brooklynwx99
    I would argue the GFS is the one with little to no support. GEPS, EPS, ECMWF, CMC, and UKMET all had amped solutions. GFS is the only one that’s pretty flat
  16. brooklynwx99
    EPS is very amplified. what a look btw, that isn’t a SE ridge linking with the -NAO… those are height rises downstream from the amping vort
  17. brooklynwx99
    EPS has trended back to its more exotic look from a couple days ago at 00z
  18. brooklynwx99
    EPS is sick
  19. brooklynwx99
    what a monster
  20. brooklynwx99
    honestly, the AIFS hasn't been any more consistent than any other model, and this storm is 8 days out. too much emphasis is placed on it IMO
  21. brooklynwx99
    there is some interest
  22. brooklynwx99
    nah i could go without being the scapegoat for less frozen water falling from the sky. i'm good
  23. brooklynwx99
    lol no model shows a cutter. could it get a little too close for comfort for the immediate coast, sure, but i find it highly unlikely that we see a system cut through the Apps. more likely to see suppression than a wet outcome here
  24. brooklynwx99
    just a massive signal here
  25. brooklynwx99
×
×
  • Create New...