
Typhoon Tip
Meteorologist-
Posts
41,098 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Typhoon Tip
-
Yeah ... I didn't know that about the GFS/NAM specifically with that site, but I do use it first thing in the morning over a cup of coffee for the Euro and Canadian. I like a coarse/cursory eval to either confirm, deny or piss me off before I dig deeper later in the morning (when I'm supposed to be doing my actual day job...) haha.
-
Not to impugn you guys ( seriously ) but that seems kind of questionable as auto practice? Tell me that's not what's happening there. We can't just dump a bunch of raw output mass into a blender - doesn't that utterly defeat the very real possibility that the nuanced solution is more correct? I'd argue that latter aspect is pretty prevalent in these fast flows scenarios. Also whence it's become more apparent that telecon correlators seem to skew relative to results
-
Okay ... I see. The ICON is doing what the Euro is attempting to do. Both appear to initiate a coastal response ( to varying specific success) out of the first wave, which is in the process of being merged with the 2nd - playing rapid catch up. The 2nd wave sort of quasi captures where the first wave initially triggered the coastal response, and then takes over governing the evolution of the event thereafter.
-
I'd be okay with that. I mean ... ( you know what I mean here -) this is our first attempt at getting this winter to do jack shit that looks at all like winter. I'm willing to (holistic sensibility) allow this be an appetizer -shot across bow- type of event. You know, there's a signal around the 15th -any takers? LOL
-
NCEP should create a crowd control model called the 'OHMYGODISH' Run it several iterations over -whatever it takes - with perturbed physics and/or diabolically tweaking initialization grid values, anything to get the model to always illustrate the maximum dystopian potential. -that way ... if when we say, "It looks OHMYGODISH..." we have a direct frame of reference to pin our hopes to
-
man - this is annoying. It seems I keep seeing model renditions of this POS that match my discussion points, while they're not actually picking one of them and f'ing sticking with it. I said this morning that this NAM extrapolation -type look would be possible. I gave it some 20 or 30% chance and then here we are, a model goes ahead and maps that out. But this has happened to all of us this week with this thing. It's all shot gun solutions still
-
okay I see it - yeah that solution may (if not likely) just the NAM being the NAM. But it's putting all the emphasis on the trailing S/W. In fact, extrapolating that 84 hour frame would argue that's enough mechanical power there to trigger some sort of NJ model low response out of that thing alone. But as far as the lead, it's all but completely damping it out of existence due to wave space/destructive interference
-
Two little things to remember - this dips S (total manifold) before lifting up. Climo on that is typically a wetter system. Not sure how that aspect plays into this, but that seems like there's room there to speculate. the other aspect is that S system tracks tend to inch N when climbing up a flow slope like this scenario appears to be.