Jump to content

EastonSN+

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,008

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by EastonSN+

  1. EastonSN+
    Ha. What are your thoughts on this March 10th window? So far have not heard a MET argue against a good look yet (even DT is onboard now). Would like to get your thoughts.
  2. EastonSN+
    This was one of the most impressive miller Bs I have lived through. I only received 5.1 inches, however mixing in buffalo to a low off the Delmarva and 1.8 at the park shows how intense the NAO was.
  3. EastonSN+
    You WANT this in a strong block otherwise you are suppressed and it's congratulations MA. Look at last night the RNA actually helped us. If the RNA was weaker we risk suppression. Take a look at the MA, this and the NE sub forums. Most METS are onboard with only posters arguing against. Most of the arguments are just from "persistence". Now, if you can convince me how the H5 look is likely to fail I am all ears.
  4. EastonSN+
    Wow GEFS caved to the EPS. We have the pattern, I would wager against striking out again like December. Can't get hit by lightning twice in one year
  5. EastonSN+
    I am just happy it was not 1.3 that was reported earlier.
  6. EastonSN+
    The good period gets going around the 10th. That being said, we can still get confluence and start as snow and maybe a couple inches.
  7. EastonSN+
    This looks great, we have good cold air AND an RNA to avoid suppression
  8. EastonSN+
    I hope they remembered to measure again
  9. EastonSN+
    Yup NYC is so large there can be big diffs I don't know if the 1.3 for this storm is official.
  10. EastonSN+
    Measured 5.1 IMBY Easton CT 6.6 on the year.
  11. EastonSN+
    If I am not mistaken then it's 1.7 on the year. CPK needs 0.7 to get past the all time record I believe.
  12. EastonSN+
    Measured 5.1 in Easton CT. Any other measurements from Fairfield, Trumbull, Weston CT?
  13. EastonSN+
    Did CPK provide a measurement?
  14. EastonSN+
    Lol. Not even worth tracking records.
  15. EastonSN+
    Thata a good question. If CPK already had an inch but they don't take the measurement before 1, then the whole record keeping is complete BS and should not be considered legit in any case.
  16. EastonSN+
    Grass is where the measurements are taken not pavement.
  17. EastonSN+
    Yeah it will just be on grass where they take the measurement.
  18. EastonSN+
    When will they provide a measurement dying to know.
  19. EastonSN+
    Latest HRRR
  20. EastonSN+
    According to hourly in TWC app. At midnight the temp in NYC will drop again to 32.
  21. EastonSN+
    Cool. CPK official measurement I take in central park so as long as the grass is covered will count as an official measurement.
  22. EastonSN+
    The NAM resembles the HRRR. According to the NAM mixing during the lull then back to snow during the next pulse then back to mix.
  23. EastonSN+
    Gap followed by next pulse.
  24. EastonSN+
    On TWC the entire ground is covered in NYC. Not sure if they are in CPK. He DID say NYC had more snow in the last hour than all winter!
  25. EastonSN+
    According to HRRRR and NAM there will be another heavy pulse BUT the mix line moves north. Will see what happens.
×
×
  • Create New...