Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. The 06Z GFS shows some post St. Pattrick's Day snow for the SC coast . That would cause some confusion for those who celebrated a little late the night before. They would wake up thinking they slept through spring, summer, and fall.
  3. It's basically close the shades for the next week, then hopefully something starts appearing on models for the last 1/3 of March. Not ruling it out, but pretty boring for the foreseeable future.
  4. It’s 3/10…still a month of threats to go. But we’re approaching the equinox and obviously anything we get will be gone relatively quickly. Old snow is always the most difficult to melt.
  5. Extremely active storm track but fortunately it seems west of here for the near future. Possibly a significant tornado day in Texas and maybe even Illinois today. If energy keeps rising from Texas to Michigan we will keep catching tail end of systems with highest severe threats when they are this week west of here
  6. So much talk about melting snow….does it really matter…it’s comical.
  7. You just said yesterday it’s done…or were you just playing along with Scott?
  8. It will be nearly or completely vanquished by Thursday morning. dews in the low-mid 50's overnight tomorrow: If you can survive that, then you might be able to retain it for a while afterwards.
  9. Not a zero percent chance for something to pop
  10. "1884: John Park Finley issued the first experimental tornado prediction. Finley studied the atmospheric parameters that were present during previous tornadoes. Many of these same criteria are still used by operational forecasters today. But the use of tornado forecasts would be banned just a few years later and remain forbidden until 1952." Why were forecasts banned? Do you know? Found this. http://site.extension.uga.edu/climate/2025/03/tornado-forecasting-was-banned-in-the-u-s-for-60-years-why/
  11. The 6Z GFS suite is looking really stupid in being on its own including all of the main short term models in showing a snow threat in portions of C and E NC on Thu (3/12). Why is the GFS showing this?? GFS (Kuchera): GEFS mean (10:1): GEFS mean is almost all from the clueless members 4 and 14 with a small assist by 2 and 7 while the other 26 members essentially have nothing outside of the mtns:
  12. you know it's over when the conversation is about how fast the leftover snowpack and piles will melt
  13. I can walk on this and there's plenty left right now.. some knew
  14. Hard to knock a winter that started in late November and will finish with over 90" inches of snow, but having winter completely disappear after early to mid February along with the 3 complete melt offs in early December, Christmas, and early January take me from what would have been a A/A+ to an A-.
  15. Track the Mets season. Let's go Mets! Let's go Mets! We'll miss the Polar Bear though....
  16. I agree, it will go faster today...yesterday the dews slowed it, which was my original point.
  17. Just patchy at this point, and some coverage remaining across shielded areas. not sure it counts as 'snow cover'. I'll call the streak at 43 days
  18. My allergies just suddenly popped up today. I am miserable right now.
  19. Tw’s were still in the mid 40s. It’s softening up and getting more primed though. Today will be a more efficient melter up here…warmer, higher dews, and less cirrus taint. Put a stick on top of your pack and see how far it sinks through today.
  20. "we" meaning in this area here Aside, the post was about 'warm being defeated' ... some were using snow as the observational proxy in that, which was dumb and proves a filtration bias in the first place because it was warm yesterday. Frankly, I care less about the snow stuff anyway. We did lose a substantial amount though. It looks like half..
  21. I'm going to absolutely LOSE IT if RIC gets more snow while we suck ass
  22. I had 23-25" depth at peak, now I have 13-15"...so have lost 10" off of peak depth....nothing to argue there; I took the measurements...it's ground truth. 30-50% loss in total, yes....about dead-on.
  23. You could give people a bowl of oranges and ask them what color they are and half of them would tell you blue or purple. Joe public isn’t too bright.
  24. Yesterday alone? False...not where I am....I didn't lose 7".
  25. . Interesting. I’m shocked at the axis of heavier stuff tho. Absolutely shocked.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...