Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Looks like the rain yesterday has boosted surface dews a bit. Helps to offset the fact that air temperatures aren't climbing really into the 90s.
  3. Channeling my inner Wiz right now...All this heat and dews and/or summer cancel talk is boring, are we getting t-storms tonight or not?
  4. So we really still going to see storms fire off today?
  5. Looking to be more of a flash flood event for Chicago versus severe at this point. Not feeling confident for severe later.
  6. dewing the dew with a 77 dew!
  7. Yup.. sucks lol. Working outside now sucks. Oh well. Better then being stuck in an office building.
  8. Concord River in Billerica is very, very low. Signs of the drought
  9. Chicago NWS Izzi CAM guidance remains very aggressive with a strongly unstable and rather large warm/unstable sector ahead of the cold front, though most CAMs do not seem to be handling the current size/magnitude of the MCS and associated cold pool well. Recent observational trends raise significant questions about how realistic the CAM depictions are. Certainly, given the magnitude of the forcing, we feel that at least some moderate destabilization will occur and likely support a strongly forced QLCS developing along the cold front this afternoon and spreading into northern IL this evening. Magnitude of the recovery and subsequent destabilization across northern IL is somewhat unclear ahead of this QLCS, but given the strong forcing and unseasonably strong deep and low level shear, there could a damaging wind and QLCS tornado threat even with somewhat modest instability. Should recovery and instability be more significant, like many CAMS show, then potential would increase for a derecho/QLCS tornado threat this evening. We will be closely monitoring observational trends this afternoon.
  10. Great to hear the news, @Ian!! Will be supporting anyway I can and would love to chat in person sometime. Feel free to stop by more!
  11. Moderate nudged south some? Riding the Bloomington/Pontiac/Kankakee corridor
  12. Mostly tho really annoying summer cold...
  13. Nice! I know our severe wx expert Jeff Halverson uses the site a lot -- he is always posting it in Slack. It does seem to be going well so far... kinda weird but should be fun.
  14. I installed one yesterday and the other this morning.
  15. Yea our June’s have been so incredibly warm recently that our collective bias is +5
  16. Mesoscale Discussion 1087 NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 1127 AM CDT Thu Jun 11 2026 Areas affected...western Pennsylvania...eastern Ohio...western Maryland...north-central Virginia...and much of West Virginia Concerning...Severe potential...Watch possible Valid 111627Z - 111830Z Probability of Watch Issuance...60 percent SUMMARY...Increasing thunderstorm coverage is anticipated across the region through early afternoon. The main risk will be severe wind gusts, and perhaps some hail. A severe thunderstorm watch may be warranted to cover these threats. DISCUSSION...Amidst a relatively zonal (if not slightly ridged) upper-air pattern, a subtle impulse is noted in water vapor imagery over western Lake Erie and central OH as of 1600z. Associated mesoscale ascent is contributing to increasing mid-level cloudiness in the area. Closer to the surface, diurnal heating and warm, moist advection with southwesterly surface flow is driving temperatures and dewpoints into the low-/mid- 80s and 70s F, respectively. The 12z PIT (Pittsburgh, PA) sounding showed steeper lapse rates around 1-3 km AGL (up to around 7 C/km) that decrease with height, and bulk shear around 20-25 kts. Over the next couple of hours, this modest westerly shear should persist as the mid-level impulse moves through. Associated forcing and diurnal destabilization should yield scattered thunderstorm development through the early afternoon. Relatively large CAPE values (around 2000+ J/kg) will support some downbursts/severe wind gusts with any stronger cores or merging outflows. The moist environment and weaker-shear regime should temper the hail threat, but some hail cannot be ruled out. ..Flournoy/Gleason.. 06/11/2026 ...Please see www.spc.noaa.gov for graphic product... ATTN...WFO...BUF...CTP...LWX...RNK...PBZ...RLX...CLE..
  17. As of noon, RDU (and Rocky Mt, NC also) was at 94F, not surprisingly THE hottest in the entire SE. I’m including all SE states including FL. With 94 at noon, RDU has a a good shot at ~101-2 despite the NWS forecast having “only” upper 90s for the Raleigh area. This, of course, is assuming that clouds and convection don’t start to increase there or even in the general vicinity: “TODAY MOSTLY SUNNY. ISOLATED SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS THIS AFTERNOON. HOT WITH HIGHS IN THE UPPER 90S. SOUTHWEST WINDS 5 TO 10 MPH. CHANCE OF RAIN 20 PERCENT. HEAT INDEX VALUES UP TO 102.”
  18. Logan is referenced all the time. Have an intern look up the coops and they’ll see it’s off by 2-3” total LEQ for the late Jan and late Feb snow events. But the media just blindly runs with it.
  19. Man that is one clean looking radar at the moment.
  20. There's not a single 12z CAM that has a handle on evolution of the initial MCS.
  21. Scott is right about piss poor w.e. measurements in some of the big snow events. Slap on a few inches there. The last 20+ years have been really wet overall too and that has caused a bump up in the 30 years normals. Throw in a slightly dry stretch and the same period looks a lot drier now than it would’ve in the 90s. I’m not saying it hasn’t been BN in some areas long term, but I think lake and stream levels are better indicators. And don’t get me started again about 1” lawns.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...