Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,003
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Augdewst 2026: Summer's Last Stand


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, dendrite said:

heh. Found the obs. Almost the same exact deal as today. A nice TSRA to bring the swampazz back after the 100F too.

MIA,1942-07-21 15:00,METAR KMIA 211500Z 31510KT 34/23 A2997 RMK AO2 SLP152 T03390233 
MIA,1942-07-21 16:00,METAR KMIA 211600Z 31507KT 35/22 A2997 RMK AO2 SLP152 T03500217 
MIA,1942-07-21 17:00,METAR KMIA 211700Z 27008KT 35/22 A2996 RMK AO2 SLP149 T03500217 
MIA,1942-07-21 18:00,METAR KMIA 211800Z 27008KT 36/24 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP139 T03610244 
MIA,1942-07-21 19:00,METAR KMIA 211900Z 36006KT 38/21 A2992 RMK AO2 SLP135 T03780211 
MIA,1942-07-21 20:00,METAR KMIA 212000Z 13507KT 8SM +TSRA SHRA 34/24 A2991 RMK AO2 SLP132 T03390244

Synoptically there is light NW flow at 925 mb over FL still tdy, so that makes such events more likely, but as we saw ydy, the mesoscale details were everything.  It all lined up perfectly for 2-3 hr.  Law of averages and large numbers say this will happen at times!  And this time, it just happened to be at a long-term climate site.

Also, when one extreme occurs, another one like it in the short-term is often much more likely.  Similar patterns breed similar sensible wx.  How about that period Jan-Feb 2015?  Probably one of the most spectacular examples for New England, and it was so localized, confined to ern MA/RI and Downeast ME, but it was @CoastalWx "VIOLENTLY RELENTLESS! " :D

It used to be thought heat bursts were rare, but once the NWS and FAA installed ASOS/AWOS in the 90s w/ so many more locations and 1-min obs 24/7, we found they are a lot more common than we thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Your brain is beer fried if you think 82/57 isn't COC in mid August. 

Screenshot_20260819_121021_Chrome.jpg

It mixed out a bit, but I don’t think of this as a traditional chamber airmass even though it’s a beautiful day. Dews will be back in the mid 60s there this evening into tomorrow.

There’s a larger airmass change tomorrow into Friday in NNE, but the front will be hung up way down there. Next week we may see more of a backbreaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

S coast south and west . Lots of mid level dry air inland 

The dry air is relative to the track and placement of the front. The overall heaviest of rain and thunderstorms is south (NJ/LI)...maybe CT coast but I think the llvl warm front is north enough to where we get precip to build inland. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

The dry air is relative to the track and placement of the front. The overall heaviest of rain and thunderstorms is south (NJ/LI)...maybe CT coast but I think the llvl warm front is north enough to where we get precip to build inland. 

Yeah can’t rule out a couple showers scattered but the heavy stuff stays south 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chrisrotary12 said:

Didn’t SSTs down there hit 100 a couple years ago?

Yes, but this common, esp. in shallow marshes/swamps in S FL.  Too many hype-masters act like it significant, but it is not.  Also, we have many more marine sites now, not just from NDBC, but NOS and private organizations.  You have an entire dense network dedicated to the coastal Everglades (see map attached), so finding a location that has 100 F water temp is not hard these days.

What happens if the area is in a dry period or a single location just happens to miss out on diurnal SHRA/TSRA for an extended period in the summer, that stagnant shallow water heats up, but as soon as you get heavy rain at the location, you'll see the water temp plunge into the mid 80s. 

All this is normal.

I see posts merely for hype and content, showing coastal water temps in the low 90s for the cntrl and srn part of FL, when again, this is normal every summer.

The angle used is that "this is big fuel for hurricanes!"  No, it is not. Local shallow water this warm is not a factor, and really, well before the core of a TC gets to these locations, it has already rained and the water temps have dropped significantly!

You need large areas of warm water, and not just skin deep, for a TC to thrive and get intense.  And this I bet many are not aware, even some mets.   The limit for SSTs over large, open areas (key here *is* "large" and "open") around the globe is ~30-31 C.  This is b/c at this temp, evaporation matches the incoming solar radiation, so that caps things off.  Also a factor, many areas where the SSTs are this high, the atmosphere is conditionally unstable, so large areas of SHRA/TSRA are common, never mind semi-permanent features such as the ITCZ and monsoon trof present, and this also keeps things in check for SSTs.
 

sfl.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Really starting to think alot of these GFS "canes" are a mere factor of a heavy climatological skew so the GFS just wants to pump out hurricanes. 

This might be the most uneventful hurricane season in my lifetime 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Why are we picking different airports for each post thruout the day, none of which is anywhere near where the  poster lives or works ?

Worcester is the closest station to me. Concord is the closest station to dendrite. It's not that difficult. I can give you the information but I can't make you understand it .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WxWatcher007 said:

 

Bob likely had several spinners in SE MA and CC, but this was two years before the 88D was installed and prior to the NWS MAR (Modernization and Restructuring) in the mid 90s.  Documentation of spinners in the NEUS prior to this time?  I was not impressed.  It was not nearly as systematic and detailed as it is now.  Also, the sheer scale of the HU wind damage likely precluded any tor investigations for Bob.

Look at this statement from the PVD WSO a few days after Gloria (attached).

First, @weatherwiz proby be like, "This is blasphemy!  They did not officially counts these!  EVERY spinner in New England is a BIG DEAL!"  :D

Second, this proves my point about the practices in these days.  They had valid and reliable tor reports, but chose to "punt" and do this instead.  These tors here do not show up in NCEI Storm Data, so they are not part of the official record.  5 tor reports here, that is significant.  How many single days have 5 tors in New England, let any tor in RI?  Going back to 1950, up until Gloria, there were only 2 official tors I think in RI in Storm Data, and there were 3 reports from Gloria alone.  That is huge from a climo standpoint!  Side note:  The following year, RI was "vindicated."  You had this highly visible spout in Narraganset Bay just offshore of Bristol on July 3, 1986 (not the 8th as said here), and clearly seen from the PVD airport.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/july-8-1986-bristol-rhode-island-narragansett-bay--63894888436120341/

And then RI 3 spinners Aug 7-8, 1986, including an F2 in downtown PVD!
 

pvdtor.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...