Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,681
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

"Don’t do it" 2026 Blizzard obs, updates and pictures.


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

There is some deep shit on the S shore even after the settling and mild weather. This is Hanover. No drift. Not shady either. 
 

IMG_2020.jpeg

Epic maybe have that :cory:dude come measure what 84 hrs later. I went from 38 to 23.5. There peak depth had to be 40+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dendrite said:

Those rates were large enough that there was a period where they were racking up high ratio snows. Compaction is real especially with big totals like that. I think it’s a little insulting to assume everyone in that 30”+ zone doesn’t know how to measure new snowfall…especially paid, trained observers at PVD. 

Oh thank you. I told him it is demeaning to those who faithfully and diligently assist our Government. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tunafish said:

I would have liked to have seen the constitution he carries in his car.  At least that would have been a consolation payoff.  But we know he doesn't actually have one.

It's a Pocket One Genius, Given to me by our Senator at his DC office years ago.  Asshat.  Not a freaking Parchment Paper from the 18th Century.  You guys Absolutely Suck.  And for F's Sake WHAT was a Joke in the video?  That I couldn't find ONE Single Measurement over 18.5" even though I went to 24 spots over 12 towns Less than 15 hours after the storm ended?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheSnowman said:

And for F's Sake WHAT was a Joke in the video?  That I couldn't find ONE Single Measurement over 18.5" even though I went to 24 spots over 12 towns Less than 15 hours after the storm ended?  

Okay you got me, and all of the shadow measurers who've co-conspired to fake the snowfall totals all across SNE, working in collaboration with Big Accordion to get you so frustrated with this hobby that you go out and impulse buy 10 Pigini Mythos accordions to fix the snow drift-sized hole in your heart. You've busted us, just like your snow forecast busted. The jig is up. You happy now?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Cobalt said:

The self-listing of accolades under the Youtube bio tells the whole story

2a08ece714ae76bfb400241f8dcdabdb.png.704e0738054050e5ac5353d6523b9242.png

by the way, those 4 "TED Talks" are a subset called TedX talks. Basically anyone can apply for one of those so long as they have an interesting story, no accolades or anything required. Someone could probably do one on the ups and downs of being on this board lmao

I wasn't aware that in the Entertainment Industry, you are NOT supposed to show your accolades on your channel.  I guess everyone has been doing it wrong.  And Another Presumptive Lie - I was ASKED By those TEDx organizations to give talks.  You don't just apply and get them.  And My first one in 2013 was The First in the WORLD on the Accordion.  It's sad I have to defend my music career on a weather board because you people are acting like this.  Provide.  Evidence.  Against.  What I showed in the video.  SHOW ME Videos of people's measurements and time lapses.  Not going after my music career with baseless BS.  

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cobalt said:

Okay you got me, and all of the shadow measurers who've co-conspired to fake the snowfall totals all across SNE, working in collaboration with Big Accordion to get you so frustrated with this hobby that you go out and impulse buy 10 Pigini Mythos accordions to fix the snow drift-sized hole in your heart. You've busted us, just like your snow forecast busted. The jig is up. You happy now?

So how much snow did I get?  Tell me, how much did I get?  I've only been measuring storms since 2002, and apparently I'm 15" off on this storm, so please tell me, with a 14" compact total at the highest, and 18" at Best guess with the 6 hour rule, How much did I get?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Epic maybe have that :cory:dude come measure what 84 hrs later. I went from 38 to 23.5. There peak depth had to be 40+

I went out to 6 towns only 4 hours after the show stopped, and 6 More towns 15 hours after the snow stopped.  And that STILL doesn't explain getting almost Half of what it should have been.  

If you get 36"-39" of show, it should be AT LEAST 31"-32" Compact or else we should ERASE All previous statistics of snow history cause we're lying to ourselves in how we measure.  And you want to say it compacted a few inches by the time I got to some of these spots?  Sure.  So I should have seen copious 28" measurements, and hence 33"+ snow depth measurements with the spots that had previous snow beneath.  And yet you saw what you saw.  Consistent 14"-18", including my town.  Just as the piles in my town look almost Identical to the Providence and Cranston bullseye.  

You're All telling me The Storm Compacted 40%+ in 4 hours or 50% in 15 hours?  Give me a break.  That's Never happened in any storm Ever around here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheSnowman said:

So how much snow did I get?  Tell me, how much did I get?  I've only been measuring storms since 2002, and apparently I'm 15" off on this storm, so please tell me, with a 14" compact total at the highest, and 18" at Best guess with the 6 hour rule, How much did I get?  

Occam's razor. Either 50+ trained spotters with corroborating radar history + liquid equivalent measurements + hundreds of non-trained measurers were completely off their rockers and ALL mismeasured by half the storm's total or greater, or.. one emotionally-charged postered missed out on the best banding, and got salty about it? 

  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's gotta be a new term for this. Slant sticking is when you're salty about your own snow measurements so you inflate your own totals. What do you call it when you're salty about your own snow measurements so you go out and deflate other people's snow totals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tunafish said:

He's cherry-picking to fit his narrative.  Notice how all but one of his shots show only the yardstick and about a square foot around it?

Cherry Picking?  I went to 2 spots Per Town!  What tuna, I needed to make a 2 Hour video NO ONE would watch of me walking out of my car and going to the spot?  Nothing in the video is a lie.  The Big open TF Green spot before the runway is as clear as day for one.  I didn't go into crappy spots.  I'M THE GUY that Screams at people for horrible places to measure.  I was Looking for any big open untouched area that looked like it had Lots of snow.  I didn't go where I could try to prove my point.  One of the other 2 spots I put on the video for TF Green was Clearly a bit drifty but I Still measured it.  I was not trying to find evidence I was right.  The fact almost every measurement across all the towns was between 14-18 Including my own, should tell you something.  As should the piles not looking any different NOR 12"-15" of snow Bigger than 2015 or 2013 or 2005 which is what we got.  The piles should looked Unbelievable and Out of a Snow Dream in every way.  They were not.  Especially today they aren't as had tons of melting today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Cobalt said:

There's gotta be a new term for this. Slant sticking is when you're salty about your own snow measurements so you inflate your own totals. What do you call it when you're salty about your own snow measurements so you go out and deflate other people's snow totals?

Dick Slanting? or Slant Dicking?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, tunafish said:

I wasn't even talking about his theory, I just think he is a gigantic turd.  

But now that we're talking about it... am I supposed to believe that all those observers conspired together to inflate their totals, via selective drift measurements, and that almost all of them reporting damn close to double what dipstick is saying?

And the other guy in here thinks it's people were trying make the storm live up to the hype after the 'rug pull', just so they dont feel like they missed out on a generational storm?  Wut?

Do I think those measurements are 100% accurate, definitely not, but I'm talking within 15-25% of reality. You could convince me of the higher end, but not broadly.  But dozens of people reporting 100% more than "what really fell" is ridiculous to me.

Also highly doubt the NWS tried earnestly to convince him he had a higher total.  Impressive display of narcissistic personality disorder, really.

I think this is a guy who has a history of overreaction when it comes to jackpots and him missing out.  He was having epic meltdowns leading up to this event.  I dont think he can handle missing the earlier event this season and the jack on this.  If I can't have it nobody can'd.

He's actually greatly respected in his field and probably the best accordion player alive. Measuring snow may be a different story, I don't know, not following, storms done sand goner, we got what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...