Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,488
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, winter_warlock said:

Ok question for u all  how accurate is the AI GFS and AI euro compared to the others?

The AI Euro is a deadly fuckin model, especially inside D4. It was the only model that reliably sniffed out that the Feb 2025 storm was going out to sea, without really wavering.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question for anyone more knowledgeable about the internals of AI models, both the Euro and GFS versions.  Do they tend to "hold onto" or continue to reflect previous runs in general, for a couple of cycles?  That is, if they show a great hit, do they tend to still sort of show that in the next run and perhaps gradually diminish over time?  I ask that in terms of the standard dynamical models which rely upon initial conditions based upon a short forecast from the previous run, so some of the "information" gets propagated so to speak.  This doesn't happen all the time, but there are notable events (ahem, some storm in Dec. 2010!) that held on to "good" runs for us before finally later giving up on that idea.  Vice-versa has also happened I'm sure (but we tend to recall the bad busts!).  I don't know if AI models do the same or if they just take an initial field, and based on the same long training sample they were derived with, come up with whatever forecast regardless of what the immediate preceding run(s) showed.  Not sure if I asked this correctly and hope it makes sense, but I am curious.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

Question for anyone more knowledgeable about the internals of AI models, both the Euro and GFS versions.  Do they tend to "hold onto" or continue to reflect previous runs in general, for a couple of cycles?  That is, if they show a great hit, do they tend to still sort of show that in the next run and perhaps gradually diminish over time?  I ask that in terms of the standard dynamical models which rely upon initial conditions based upon a short forecast from the previous run, so some of the "information" gets propagated so to speak.  This doesn't happen all the time, but there are notable events (ahem, some storm in Dec. 2010!) that held on to "good" runs for us before finally later giving up on that idea.  Vice-versa has also happened I'm sure (but we tend to recall the bad busts!).  I don't know if AI models do the same or if they just take an initial field and based on the same long training sample come up with whatever forecast regardless of what the immediate preceeding run(s) showed.  Not sure if I asked this correctly and hope it makes sense, but I am curious.

@high risk my MVP wil likely be able to provide the answer

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bncho said:

The AI Euro is a deadly fuckin model, especially inside D4. It was the only model that reliably sniffed out that the Feb 2025 storm was going out to sea, without really wavering.

Then it would throw us a bone by shifting very slightly north and west for a run only for the very next run to shift even further south and east that it was before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know from looking at various types of events (not just for snow) that the AIFS (Euro) has done a stunningly good job out to 5 or even 7 days for situations that are rather tricky.  And it tended to lock in, not go all over the place.  Granted, those cases were just specific individual ones that maybe were more favorable for it, but you get the idea.  I'm pretty impressed with how the AI models have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

I wouldn’t pay much attention to the AI models for mesoscale features. But synoptic scale? Euro AI is a cheat code inside D4-5. GFSAI outperforming physics-based GFS as well

Totally agree...at this point (until they improve or there's more mesoscale AI type models) they won't capture small features like banding, convective elements, and the like.  But for overall synoptic setup and general low and precip locations as you say, it's rather bang-on in a lot of cases.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bncho said:

pretty cool signal for 8 days out

Screenshot 2026-01-18 at 1.00.42 PM.png

Oy, Gevalt, yes please!  But seriously...ignoring the specific amounts, the ensembles (mean at least) clearly has the main swath of snow (and precip) through the area here.  Going with just that, it's clear the deterministic GFS is currently outside the main envelope here with giving GA/SC/NC the heaviest snow and/or ice.

(ETA:  Gotta put out the usual disclaimer that I'm not saying the GFS will be wrong, just that with the current indications it's looking like an outlier solution or at least too much suppression.)

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

Oy, Gevalt, yes please!  But seriously...ignoring the specific amounts, the ensembles (mean at least) clearly has the main swath of snow (and precip) through the area here.  Going with just that, it's clear the deterministic GFS is currently outside the main envelope here with giving GA/SC/NC the heaviest snow and/or ice.

(ETA:  Gotta put out the usual disclaimer that I'm not saying the GFS will be wrong, just that with the current indications it's looking like an outlier solution or at least too much suppression.)

You can see a secondary swath across the deep south, so its clear that there are a few suppressed members. But still are in the minority. The op just happens to be one of them this run. Would not be surprised to see a very different 18z op run. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Terpeast said:

You can see a secondary swath across the deep south, so its clear that there are a few suppressed members. But still are in the minority. 

Yeah, good and fair point.  I don't have subscriptions to all that information so was just going by what I could make out on the zoomed-in image above.  All the same, what you mention does indicate some suppressed members but in the minority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...