Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,343
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

2025-2026 ENSO


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, stadiumwave said:

Winter cancel?

0z EPS DEC 4

Screenshot_20251122_073842_Chrome.thumb.jpg.afaebb67cde9dec3117a325885f12c43.jpg

The 0z EPS rolls the cold forward pretty much as one would expect with a WPO-/EPO-/AO-/PNA- pattern evolution. One sees how the Great Lakes/Upper Midwest is the focus of the cold while warmth proves very persistent in the Southeast.

 

288 hours:

image.thumb.png.198769397e8c070d75805c872fed0cc8.png

312 Hours:

image.thumb.png.4472b3f1431c8775cb6dd4680065477c.png

336 Hours:

image.thumb.png.933b4c3e2618f7c3b1ac90bcc13d257c.png

360 Hours:

image.thumb.png.816b7d62a7d9b3168ecfcb22e4bf017a.png

The usual caveats concerning skill apply that these timeframes. Moreover, how the stratospheric warming propagates will influence the pattern evolution for the second half of the month. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^That's a massive +NAO, MJO. With heights over Alaska neutralizing, we are going to go really warm there. These are large scale features that have a big impact on the east coast. Look at how the ridging in Alaska is just about gone in that 360hr map. If we don't hold that, the cold pattern is going to fall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

The question is what period you're discussing. There are conflicting signs the way I see it. Even conflicts with the models' own MJO forecasts and 5H forecasts. In the end, all that be done is to look at modeling and hug whichever one suites one's opinion/gut/biases since everything remains on the table once out 7+ days. But we can't deny the medium and long range forecasts this year of warm, like last year, have not been great. So that along with a weak Niña on its way out the door by year end with noticeable western Pacific cooling, I think the urge to assume warmer LR forecasts are going to verify is risky for now. If they do verify, that will change things in my weenie mind.

 

oisst_ssta_change30_global (2).png

oisst_ssta_global.png

As evidence of my statement that longer range forecasts haven't done well this year, top pick is last night's EPS forecast for Black Friday 12z and bottom forecast us from 11/15 12z.

eps_z500a_nhem_26.png

eps_z500a_nhem_52.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

As evidence of my statement that longer range forecasts haven't done well this year, top pick is last night's EPS forecast for Black Friday 12z and bottom forecast us from 11/15 12z.

Come on man.. there is like 1 instance of a ridge leading to a trough in the east coast over the last year, and it's already been posted like 3 times lol. The large scale features held: -epo, +pna. I don't know why it had a big ridge when the Pacific looked like that anyway, but you know long range models hit at about 0.80 correlation accuracy. Especially when 1,000 mile wide features have a strong signal. It's predictable. 2-4 week models are much less predictable, there is a pretty big fall off after 384hr in predictability. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Come on man.. there is like 1 instance of a ridge leading to a trough in the east coast over the last year, and it's already been posted like 3 times lol. The large scale features held: -epo, +pna. I don't know why it had a big ridge when the Pacific looked like that anyway, but you know long range models hit at about 0.80 correlation accuracy. Especially when 1,000 mile wide features have a strong signal. It's predictable. 2-4 week models are much less predictable, there is a pretty big fall off after 384hr in predictability. 

Come on what? It's a perfect example that the models are doing poorly with warm forecasts and second, we're all wasting our time with these digital slot machines we call models! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mitchnick said:

Come on what? It's a perfect example that the models are doing poorly with warm forecasts and second, we're all wasting our time with these digital slot machines we call models! Lol

In the bigger picture, it's not really a big deal. It happens rarely. I think the other notable one was in August when a lot of models were warm in the long range and it ended up being cool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

The 0z EPS rolls the cold forward pretty much as one would expect with a WPO-/EPO-/AO-/PNA- pattern evolution. One sees how the Great Lakes/Upper Midwest is the focus of the cold while warmth proves very persistent in the Southeast.

 

288 hours:

image.thumb.png.198769397e8c070d75805c872fed0cc8.png

312 Hours:

image.thumb.png.4472b3f1431c8775cb6dd4680065477c.png

336 Hours:

image.thumb.png.933b4c3e2618f7c3b1ac90bcc13d257c.png

360 Hours:

image.thumb.png.816b7d62a7d9b3168ecfcb22e4bf017a.png

The usual caveats concerning skill apply that these timeframes. Moreover, how the stratospheric warming propagates will influence the pattern evolution for the second half of the month. 

 

Dump west...bleed east

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Here's my thinking based on the latest guidance and some of the longer-range guidance. I focus on what I believe are the three biggest potential scenarios for much of December.

image.thumb.png.faaa5e7c18e50f9786e0689b3730a820.png

Not to be a weenie but what makes you think it’s “very unlikely” the pna flips positive for a period in december?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...