Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,511
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Upstate/Eastern New York


 Share

Recommended Posts

Then, for Wednesday night there remains some model spread. The
GFS is waffling a bit from run to run with how far north the low
pressure system and subsequent precip shield will get Wednesday
night...the 00z run shifted back south slightly. Meanwhile, the
00z ECMWF and it`s ensemble members actually shifted the low
and axis of heavier QPF/Snow a bit further north and west with
the 00z run. The 00z CMC remains a compromised between the GFS
and ECMWF. All 3 models show a closed 700mb low...but differ on
its track. For this forecast used a blend of WPC/ECMWF and GFS
then made minor edits. This gave QPF amounts of 0.75 to 1.30
inches across the southern tier and all of NE PA.

Still feeling confident that ptype will be exclusively snow for
our entire area, with very cold air in place...in fact as we
wet bulb out and the steady snow begins, it`s likely
temperatures will generally be in the upper 10s to mid-20s
through the event. This should get snow to liquid ratios on the
order of 14-18:1. Again, confidence is increasing that a swath
of heavy snow will impact at least a portion of our forecast
area...but exactly where this sets up remains to be seen. It`s
still too early to pin down any storm total snow amounts from
this potential storm, as it`s about 3.5 days out...but
probabilities for 6"+ are increasing across NE PA and the
Southern Tier/Catskills of CNY. Meanwhile, a tighter gradient is
showing up on the NW edge of the system, with low snow totals
noted by the latest guidance along and north of the NY
Thruway...of course there is still potential for this storm
system to shift further north...or south, which would greatly
impact potential snowfall totals.

https://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=BGM&issuedby=BGM&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the Mets in this office serious? This is the reason I now default to the KBGM office as their discussion's are much more in depth with explanation. When Tom Nizziol left the NWS that office went with him unfortunately and they will never find anyone to replace him!
Whoever is writing these discussions hasn't got a clue, seriously though. The storm doesn't strengthen along the SNE coastline it does so across the Mid-Atlantic then scoots out south of the Benchmark. Yeah, I'll never read their discussion's again.

LONG TERM /WEDNESDAY THROUGH SATURDAY/... The focus this time period will continue to be upon a storm system crossing the Southeast, and rapidly deepening off the southern New England coastline Wednesday through Thursday. The overall flow is progressive enough to keep this eastward track to the storm, with only its northwest edge brushing by our region. Light snow Wednesday will end through the night as this storm tracks towards New England. Surface high pressure behind this system will bring quiet weather to end the week with a sub freezing airmass Thursday becoming above freezing by Saturday.



Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 96blizz said:

And then there’s the stubborn EPS. Despite no Op runs of any model showing this - enough members must blitz our area for this.
 

Until this changes, I will remain interested. 

3EE4B1B7-1BA7-4EC5-B7DA-BE115CBA1EDB.png

Only issue is that's the control run, basically just a member..The mean at 0z was still 7" at 10-1 for ksyr..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all.

IMO, as has been discussed a bit earlier and needs to be emphasized, for much of Upstate NY, the exact track of the slp is less important than the evolution of the mid and upper level features, particularly at the h850 and h700 levels.

The models currently indicating a more favorable set up with these features for our area is euro ensemble mean, Icon, para GFS, and probably extrapolated NAM.

I like where we are right now, particularly BGM, SYR and points SE.  

00z Parallel GFS "feels" like a nice candidate for verification.

image.thumb.png.307deea0b0f49b8b1518853a4b182014.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LakeEffectKing said:

Hey all.

IMO, as has been discussed a bit earlier and needs to be emphasized, for much of Upstate NY, the exact track of the slp is less important than the evolution of the mid and upper level features, particularly at the h850 and h700 levels.

The models currently indicating a more favorable set up with these features for our area is euro ensemble mean, Icon, para GFS, and probably extrapolated NAM.

I like where we are right now, particularly BGM, SYR and points SE.  

00z Parallel GFS "feels" like a nice candidate for verification.

image.thumb.png.79cc230637a0e7afbfa027a578b4ff82.png

We can only hope. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...