Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

NYC/PHL December 24-27 Potential - Part 2


forkyfork

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The chance of the Euro showing a less favorable solution at 0z has to be > 90%. And the chance of it "blinking" and really changing for the worse might be at or greater than 50%. Blizzard model runs at Day 5 are so tenuous. I won't be alarmed unless all guidance moves in the wrong direction for successive runs.

Do i expect the Euro to show the mega bomb from this pm, No. What i meant is if it takes a low OTS like the GFS is doing. That would be a blink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

`

Could the mods please split off a seperate thread for discussing the 84 hour 18z Nam, Nogaps, JMA ,KMA, Hungarian, Brazilian, DGEX, Peruvian, Italian, Indian, Australian, Chinese, Mongolian, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Iraq models please. Thanks.:axe:

The Iraqi? I heard it has a well-known hot and dry bias....it will predict high 95 with 1% RH on 12/26. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"In fairness to you the 12Z GME weather model from the German Weather Service also shows a coastal hugger at hour 132."

I could be wrong, but the GME has one of the lowest verification scores of all global models.

I was just doing that as a point of reference, not that I actually follow the model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UKMET has been so bad on the last two storms I haven't even looked at one run of it, the GEM ensemble mean is the one thing I don't like right now, as well as the 18Z NAM at 500mb looking a bit more like the 12Z GFS from 72-84 hours.

Everything is relative and past performance is no indication of future trends, but the last two events for the PHI CWA, the gem has been steadiest (and more accurate). I'd watch the 50-50 low as much as the Rockies Ridge dp/dt the gfs solutions (and why it has become the southeastern streamer) for the last three sounding runs, its not forecasting it to move out of the way as quickly as other models leaving the confluence zone over the eastern conus longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mt. Holly says NO to the GFS.

THE 12Z GFS HAS A MUCH WEAKER SFC LOW, VIRTUALLY NO WELL DEFINED

VORT AND AS A RESULT IS MUCH MORE PROGRESSIVE WITH THE H5 PATN AND

KEEPS A MUCH WKR SFC LOW WELL TO OUR S AND E. THE 12Z GFS SOLN IS

AS CLOSE TO A NON-EVENT AS THE MDLS ARE SHOWING ATTM. HOWEVER, THE

GFS IS THE OUTLIER AND IS BEING DISCOUNTED ATTM.

http://forecast.weather.gov/product.php?site=NWS&issuedby=PHI&product=AFD&format=CI&version=1&glossary=1&highlight=off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...