Cold Miser Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I just chalk it up to who it was..there's some problems there. Funny but not really funny about that tanker accident on 84 in Tolland last night. People need to just avoid that 5 mile stretch . Evil lurks there lol. The two of you need to get into the ring sometime. Could be a good one. man vs. man, both of you on the floor, grasping on to each others nape's like a wolf carries it's young between its jaws. Ironically, I ended up with 2.75", which puts me at exactly 100" for the season. Thanks to all of you who believed in me and helped make it happen. This could not have been achieved without your continued love and support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Had a coating here once the sun set last night. Quickly melting this AM despite the cold temps. LI jackpot as many models had predicted. - CONNECTICUT...FAIRFIELD COUNTY...BRIDGEPORT 1.1 755 AM 3/29 CO-OP OBSERVER...NEW HAVEN COUNTY...NEW HAVEN 3.7 1245 AM 3/29 TRAINED SPOTTERNEW YORK...SUFFOLK COUNTY...PORT JEFFERSON 6.1 700 AM 3/29 PUBLICMATTITUCK 5.8 735 AM 3/29 PUBLICMILLER PLACE 5.4 630 AM 3/29 PUBLICROCKY POINT 5.0 800 AM 3/29 TRAINED SPOTTERSETAUKET 5.0 1200 AM 3/29 PUBLICSOUTHAMPTON 4.5 1129 PM 3/28 TRAINED SPOTTERCENTEREACH 4.4 730 AM 3/29 NWS EMPLOYEECORAM 4.3 1130 PM 3/28 TRAINED SPOTTERSMITHTOWN 4.0 1200 AM 3/29 PUBLICRIVERHEAD 3.5 600 AM 3/29 PUBLICCENTERPORT 3.5 800 AM 3/29 CO-OP OBSERVERSOUND BEACH 3.5 715 AM 3/29 PUBLICRONKONKOMA 3.4 835 AM 3/29 NWS EMPLOYEEUPTON 2.8 800 AM 3/29 NWS OFFICEFARMINGVILLE 2.8 745 AM 3/29 TRAINED SPOTTERWESTHAMPTON 2.0 1100 PM 3/28 NWS EMPLOYEEISLIP 1.5 100 AM 3/29 FAA OBSERVER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Apparently the final in North Haven was 3.7" from a spotter there. That PNS report should say north haven not new haven for that report. I was in VT so can't confirm but based on radar and surrounding reports (or lack thereof) that number seems a bit high. I'll have to go with it though since there are no other surrounding reports, 3.7 it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I didn't enjoy the event, I have no use for middling snow in late March. 6+ or 70+ is my mantra. I'm in the 70+ mode and I have to wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I didn't enjoy the event, I have no use for middling snow in late March. 6+ or 70+ is my mantra. I'm in the 70+ mode and I have to wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I'd rather flowers at this point. It's always been the way I am even as a child. I flip the switch when we get near the equinox. It takes something big ala 97 to reel me back. This one didn't cut it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I'd rather flowers at this point. It's always been the way I am even as a child. I flip the switch when we get near the equinox. It takes something big ala 97 to reel me back. This one didn't cut it.Time to retire to FL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Time to retire to FL? I hate florida but a warmer clime would suit my body better. Alas, I don't see retirement any time in the next 5 years barring health issues. It's way OT but I actually think work is good for me. Besides, I fear the dementia which runs so prevalent on my mothers side. I have this (unproven) illusion that if you keep things intellectually complicated maybe it staves it off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Valley Snowman Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Based on my 0.3 with 0.6 on existing snow only , it sounds like I got the shaft award here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I hate florida but a warmer clime would suit my body better. Alas, I don't see retirement any time in the next 5 years barring health issues. It's way OT but I actually think work is good for me. Besides, I fear the dementia which runs so prevalent on my mothers side. I have this (unproven) illusion that if you keep things intellectually complicated maybe it staves it off. Just don't look in the political and climate change forums...you'll lose your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 two parter awt Not as you thought? Loop the radar yesterday... maybe in part of CT it was, but for most it wasn't. Check out the obs at ORH for a central location... steady light snow from morning till night. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?table=1&banner=off&sid=korh Hey BDL also...steady light snow throughout. I think that goes as "APFT"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 In ern areas it wasn't really a two part system. It was either snowing during the day, or started during the evening in srn areas. Obs show most areas never had a break...or if they did, the ASOS didn't report it. Even IJD near our passive aggressive Ginxy was steady light snow reported from 8am until midnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Obs show most areas never had a break...or if they did, the ASOS didn't report it. Even IJD near our passive aggressive Ginxy was steady light snow reported from 8am until midnight. Kevin had a brief lull..but I'd hesitate to call it a classic two part system. Agreed. If you really want to get cute..you could argue the forcing was different..but that's kind of dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Kevin had a brief lull..but I'd hesitate to call it a classic two part system. Agreed. If you really want to get cute..you could argue the forcing was different..but that's kind of dumb.Well there was a small hole in his area but that's like getting a subsidence area in a nor'easter and then calling it a two-part event because you had to wait 30 minutes for the CCB to build in after the WCB moved out. It snowed lightly all over the region from ALB to BOS yesterday. In those really light events with 0.1" ever 6 hours for 3 panels, there could be some breaks. But the quote of mine Ginxy used seemed to have the meso models on top of it with 0.05-0.1" QPF consistently every 3 hours all day long. That appears to be what happened looking at the various ASOS obs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Not as you thought? Loop the radar yesterday... maybe in part of CT it was, but for most it wasn't. Check out the obs at ORH for a central location... steady light snow from morning till night. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/getobext.php?table=1&banner=off&sid=korh Hey BDL also...steady light snow throughout. I think that goes as "APFT"? you are missing what occurred. First part was fringe of CCB, second part was inverted trough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Obs show most areas never had a break...or if they did, the ASOS didn't report it. Even IJD near our passive aggressive Ginxy was steady light snow reported from 8am until midnight. ultra liberal psychobabble. Saying AWT is now PA,good to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 you are missing what occurred. First part was fringe of CCB, second part was inverted trough. Well that's why I said you could argue the forcing was different..but I would hesitate to call is a classic two part system. You had a brief lull in CT I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 2/14..now that was a two part system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 you are missing what occurred. First part was fringe of CCB, second part was inverted trough. Ok well I wasn't seeing a real break in most spots. I mean is a nor'easter with WAA followed by a CCB a two part event? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Based on my 0.3 with 0.6 on existing snow only , it sounds like I got the shaft award here. I measured 1.2 this morning on the snow board even though the grass was barely covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Well that's why I said you could argue the forcing was different..but I would hesitate to call is a classic two part system. You had a brief lull in CT I guess.Tip said snow flurries from 5 on, said no forcing after. We said no the invt would crank up. That's what started the whole discussion. PF never disagrees with any Met, that's just him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 ultra liberal psychobabble. Saying AWT is now PA,good to know. Haha you were definitely trolling passively by bumping my post with your comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 I measured 1.2 this morning on the snow board even though the grass was barely covered.WST had 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Haha you were definitely trolling passively by bumping my post with your comment.lol, mostly not about you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 LOL, you guys. Who cares. PF is skiing nude and Ginx is driving nude. All that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Tip said snow flurries from 5 on, said no forcing after. We said no the invt would crank up. That's what started the whole discussion. PF never disagrees with any Met, that's just him. Haha still passive agressive towards me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 LOL, you guys. Who cares. PF is skiing nude and Ginx is driving nude. All that matters. I have to stop the argument. Bout to get off the Gondola. Love ya Ginxy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 LOL, you guys. Who cares. PF is skiing nude and Ginx is driving nude. All that matters.just funnin, WST had rain in the first forcing even before daylight , the dynamics in the Invt gave them a solid extremely rare for them late March solid snowstorm. LI got crushed in part two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Haha still passive agressive towards me.I get nonpassive aggressive when it's 100/75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 WST had 3. Who cares? Port Jeff had 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.