Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,515
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    amirah5
    Newest Member
    amirah5
    Joined

Predicted snow total and events for 2014-15 IMBY


Deck Pic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Actually the ninos of 2002-2003 and 2009-2010 were Modoki type ninos.

 

MDstorm

"Recent Central Pacific El Niños happened in 1986–1988, 1991–1992, 1994–1995, 2002–2003, 2004–2005 and 2009–2010.[80] Furthermore, there were "Modoki" events in 1957–59,[81] 1963–64, 1965–66, 1968–70, 1977–78 and 1979–80.[82][83]"

 

Wikipedia always lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't have time to predict individual events, but I'll guess that mby gets 32" this season. I'm not buying into the hype that we get crushed two years in a row. That said, 32" is still 14" AN, so that's pretty damn good.

A guess? C'mon, man, you can do better than that. This thread is all about serious predictions backed by sound meteorological principle and scientific reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Recent Central Pacific El Niños happened in 1986–1988, 1991–1992, 1994–1995, 2002–2003, 2004–2005 and 2009–2010.[80] Furthermore, there were "Modoki" events in 1957–59,[81] 1963–64, 1965–66, 1968–70, 1977–78 and 1979–80.[82][83]"

 

Wikipedia always lies.

Central Pacific Ninos and Modoki events are the same thing----just different terms. :pimp:  .  See the index list below for the EMI (El Nino Modoki Index).  Positive values are linked to Modoki/Central Pacific El Ninos.  2002-2003 and 2009-2010 were Modoki events.

 

http://www.jamstec.go.jp/frcgc/research/d1/iod/DATA/emi.monthly.txt

 

MDstorm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Central Pacific Ninos and Modoki events are the same thing----just different terms. :pimp: . See the index list below for the EMI (El Nino Modoki Index). Positive values are linked to Modoki/Central Pacific El Ninos. 2002-2003 and 2009-2010 were Modoki events.

http://www.jamstec.go.jp/frcgc/research/d1/iod/DATA/emi.monthly.txt

MDstorm

Yep. And let's not put the cart before the horse either. We need to get a Nino first before classifying it. We are way way behind even the most conservative predictions a few months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. And let's not put the cart before the horse either. We need to get a Nino first before classifying it. We are way way behind even the most conservative predictions a few months ago.

Totally agree.  ENSO modeling can burn you.  However, with oncoming Kelvin wave and the fact that SOI has been solidly negative for the last 2 weeks, one can hope that the little  El Nino that could is on its way. 

 

MDstorm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree. ENSO modeling can burn you. However, with oncoming Kelvin wave and the fact that SOI has been solidly negative for the last 2 weeks, one can hope that the little El Nino that could is on its way.

MDstorm

It's been a pain in the rear end this year. It's been a step forward and a step back since spring. I agree that we probably have a decent chance stepping forward with the upcoming wave and soi but is this the start of a more prolonged push towards a Nino or just another false signal? I'm kinda jaded. I'll go false until true verifies. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do I look for the -PDO signature? The Gulf of Alaska still seems warm.

 

 

What Bob said..Here is a general representation...keep in mind that the placement of the anomalies is more important than the index number...

 

Here is currently...It's not super super negative,  but look at all the warm water...

 

post-66-0-25365900-1408558244_thumb.gif

 

Here is an example of a super positive PDO....2002-03 was an insanely positive PDO...the combination of the Nino, the +PDO and the warm GOA, helped create this sick cold pattern which eventually got snowy

 

anomnight.12.24.2002.gif

 

post-66-0-36191800-1408558495_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Bob said..Here is a general representation...keep in mind that the placement of the anomalies is more important than the index number...

 

Here is currently...It's not super super negative,  but look at all the warm water...

 

attachicon.gifanomnight.8.18.2014.gif

 

Here is an example of a super positive PDO....2002-03 was an insanely positive PDO...the combination of the Nino, the +PDO and the warm GOA, helped create this sick cold pattern which eventually got snowy

 

anomnight.12.24.2002.gif

 

attachicon.gifeSkH6mKCI5.png

 

I see what we are looking at now. Thanks for the clarification, although wouldn't this be beneficial for another vortex visit at some point this winter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been trending consistently down since the peak of 1.80 in May. 

 

anomnight.5.29.2014.gif

 

 

It is what it is. If the current ssta's look like this in Nov then we'll have to claw to climo snow. 

 

It fluctuates quite a bit anyway and not sure it will kill us either...The decadal state is probably still negative though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Bob said..Here is a general representation...keep in mind that the placement of the anomalies is more important than the index number...

 

Here is currently...It's not super super negative,  but look at all the warm water...

 

attachicon.gifanomnight.8.18.2014.gif

 

Here is an example of a super positive PDO....2002-03 was an insanely positive PDO...the combination of the Nino, the +PDO and the warm GOA, helped create this sick cold pattern which eventually got snowy

 

anomnight.12.24.2002.gif

 

attachicon.gifeSkH6mKCI5.png

Isn't 4 months enough time to see some big changes there?

 

Also, would a couple of strong hurricanes in the west Pacific have any effect on those ocean surface temps that far north?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...