Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Winter Interior NW Burbs & Hudson Valley - 2014


Animal

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Zip 10952 (Rockland county), elevation 550ft, what do your think totals looking at?

 Hi neighbor. I live in Nanuet. If the EURO, NAM and SREFs are correct, I think 18 inches or so is a distinct possibility. It's close, because the cutoff on precip will be sharp, but we are not very far north and west of the city

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is my final call. Tossing the extreme euro solutions.

the gfs is garbagio in general but especially within 36 hours, the two most reliable within 24 hours are euro and nam, and coincidently they offer the best solutions for most...also the trough is already tilting negative which the gfs modeling was a good 2 hours behind in its latest run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is closing off a bit sooner. That might pull it in a bit tighter . We'll see. Looks like they are leaning towards a NAM/euro solution.

Yeah I noticed that as well.. We need this b**ch to get captured directly underneath LI.. Anything E of MTP will result in huge totals for CT & LI and alot of disappointment for those W of the Hudson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consensus pretty much developing that the good dynamics make it as far as NYC and possibly the eastern side of the Hudson Valley, though this is debatable looking at the guidance as a whole. Also, every model shows a deformation band in either western (or some cases central) CT. Given the fickle nature of banding, I would say that we are all still in the game for decent totals out of this. Thankfully, I don't think any of us expected 2-3 feet to begin with, so that should help ease the sting of 10"+ of snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consensus pretty much developing that the good dynamics make it as far as NYC and possibly the eastern side of the Hudson Valley, though this is debatable looking at the guidance as a whole. Also, every model shows a deformation band in either western (or some cases central) CT. Given the fickle nature of banding, I would say that we are all still in the game for decent totals out of this. Thankfully, I don't think any of us expected 2-3 feet to begin with, so that should help ease the sting of 10"+ of snow.

 

 

The euro has cut my Qpf total is half in 24 hours. Amazing.(king euro)

Hopefully I clean up with snow ratios.

Best guess now if 5-8 inches of snow in my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consensus pretty much developing that the good dynamics make it as far as NYC and possibly the eastern side of the Hudson Valley, though this is debatable looking at the guidance as a whole. Also, every model shows a deformation band in either western (or some cases central) CT. Given the fickle nature of banding, I would say that we are all still in the game for decent totals out of this. Thankfully, I don't think any of us expected 2-3 feet to begin with, so that should help ease the sting of 10"+ of snow.

Anyone who was expecting 2-3 feet really needs to take a step back and work on their expectations IMO but I know its easy to get carried away in these 'virtual snowstorms'.  I'm just looking for a double digit snowfall, of course the higher the better though ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...